Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:52:53.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AN ATTRACTANT FOR THE BEET WEBWORM, LOXOSTEGE STICTICALIS (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. L. Struble
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta
C. E. Lilly
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta

Abstract

A sex pheromone was detected in female moths of the beet webworm, Loxostege sticticalis (L.). Laboratory tests with synthetic compounds established that the male moths exhibited sexual responses to E-11-tetradecen-1-yl acetate and they were attracted to this compound in the field. Mixtures of E-11-tetradecen-1-yl acetate containing 5, 10, or 80% of the Z-isomer inhibited the attraction of the male beet webworm moths. Mixtures containing 5 or 10% of the Z-isomer attracted male moths of Lymnaecia phragmitella Stainton (Cosmopterygidae). Male moths of Hysterosia cartwrightana Kearfott (Phaloniidae) were also attracted to E-11-tetradecen-1-yl acetate in traps placed at a height of 0.3 m, with only a few attracted to traps at 1 m as used for the beet webworm.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alekhin, V. A. 1968. On the development of the fauna of sugar beet insect pests under the irrigation conditions in the southeast European part of the USSR. Ent. Rev. 47: 449454.Google Scholar
Beirne, B. P. 1971. Pest insects of annual crop plants in Canada. I. Lepidoptera. II. Diptera. III. Coleoptera. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 78.Google Scholar
Beroza, M. and Bierl, Barbara A.. 1967. Rapid determination of olefin position in organic compounds in microgram range by ozonolysis and gas chromatography. Anal. Chem. 39: 11311135.Google Scholar
Boselli, F. 1951. Stato presente delle conoscenze su Loxostege (Phlyctaenodes) sticticalis L., lepidottero dannoso ai medicai irrigui in Sardegna. [The present state of knowledge on L. sticticalis damaging irrigated lucerne in Sardinia.] Ann. Sper. Agric. (N.S.) 5: 12471285.Google Scholar
Abstr. in Rev. appl. Ent. (A) 41: 109. 1953.Google Scholar
Butt, B. A., McGovern, T. P., Beroza, M., and Hathaway, D. O.. 1974. Codling moth: cage and field evaluations of traps baited with a synthetic sex attractant. J. econ. Ent. 67: 3740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporale, F. 1967. Richerche su Loxostege (Phlyctaenodes) sticticalis L. (Lepidoptera, Piralidae). Nota preliminare. [Studies on L. sticticalis. Preliminary note.] Boll. Soc. ent. ital. 97: 9799.Google Scholar
Abstr. in Rev. appl. Ent. (A) 56: 962. 1968.Google Scholar
Chittenden, F. H. 1902. Some insects injurious to vegetable crops. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 33.Google Scholar
Creelman, Isobel S. (Ed.) 1971. Can. agric. Insect Pest Rev. 49Google Scholar
Emken, E. A., Scholfield, C. R., and Dutton, H. J.. 1964. Chromatographic separation of cis- and trans- fatty esters by argentation with a macroreticular exchange resin. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 41: 388390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieser, L. F. and Fieser, M.. 1967. Reagents for organic synthesis. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Forbes, W. T. M. 1923. The Lepidoptera of New York and neighboring states. Memoirs 68. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. 1932. The beet webworm. Circ. Can. Dep. Agric. 14.Google Scholar
Houx, N. W. H., Voerman, S., and Jongen, W. M. F.. 1974. Purification and analysis of synthetic insect sex attractants by liquid chromatography on a silver-loaded resin. J. Chromatog. 96: 2532.Google Scholar
Maxson, A. C. 1948. Insects and diseases of the sugar beet, pp. 117130. The Beet Sugar Development Foundation, Fort Collins, Colo.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, J. R., Shorey, H. H., Gaston, L. K., Kaae, R. S., and Stewart, F. D.. 1972. Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera XXXI. Disruption of sex pheromone communication in Pectinophora gossypiella with hexalure. Environ. Ent. 1: 645650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, J. H. and Hastings, E.. 1941. Life history and control of the sugar beet webworm Loxostege sticticalis (L.). Bull. Montana St. Coll. agric. Exp. Stn 389.Google Scholar
Pepper, J. H. and Hastings, E.. 1943. Biochemical studies on the sugar beet webworm [Loxostege sticticalis (L.)]. Bull. Montana St. Coll. agric. Exp. Stn 413.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W., Hill, A., Cardé, R., Tette, J., Madsen, H., and Vakenti, J.. 1974. Sex pheromones of the fruittree leafroller moth, Archips argyrospilus. Environ. Ent. 3: 747751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H.. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, N.Y.Google Scholar
Struble, D. L. and Jacobson, L. A.. 1970. A sex pheromone in the redbacked cutworm. J. econ. Ent. 63: 841844.Google Scholar
Vries, B. de. 1963. Quantitative separations of higher fatty acid methyl esters by adsorption chromatography on silica impregnated with silver nitrate. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 40: 184186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zogg, H. and Salzmann, R.. 1947. Bericht über die Tatigkeit der Eidg. Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchsanstalt Zürich-Oerlikon für die Jahre 1942–1946. 8 Pflanzen-schutz. [Report of the Federal Agricultural Experimental Station Zürich-Oerlikon for the years 1942–1946. 8. Plant Protection.] Landw. Jb. Schweiz. 61 pt. 2, pp. 214222. Berne, 1947.Google Scholar
Abstr. in Rev. appl. Ent. (A) 37: 445. 1949.Google Scholar