Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:12:57.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AN ANNOTATED KEY TO DROSOPHILID GENERA WITH BARE OR MICROPUBESCENT ARISTAE AND A REVISION OF PARACACOXENUS (DIPTERA: DROSOPHILIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. F. McAlpine*
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa

Abstract

The world genera (15 in all) of Drosophilidae with bare (i.e., non-plumose) aristae are brought together, and a key is provided for identifying them. Notes are provided in the key on type species, synonymy, numbers and distributions of included species, and pertinent literature. The genus Paracacoxenus Hardy is revised to include not only its one Nearctic species, guttatus Hardy and Wheeler, but also three European species that were originally assigned to Cacoxenus Loew, i.e., argyreator (Frey), exiguus (Duda), and inquilinus (Hendel). Lectotypes are designated for Cacoxenus punctatus Duda (a junior synonym of Gitonides perspicax Knab), for Gitona vlasovi Duda, for Paracacoxenus argyreator (Frey), and for P. exiguus (Duda). The paper includes 30 figures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basden, E. B. 1956. Drosophilidae (Diptera) within the Arctic Circle. I. General survey. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 108: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basden, E. B., and Harnden, D. G.. 1956. Drosophilidae (Diptera) within the Arctic Circle. II. The Edinburgh University Expedition to subarctic Norway, 1953. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 108: 147162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brues, C. T., and Melander, A. L.. 1932. Classification of insects. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv., No. 73.Google Scholar
Brues, C. T., Melander, A. L., and Carpenter, F. M.. 1954. Classification of insects. (Revised ed.) Bull. Mus. cornp. Zool. Harv., No. 108.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D. W. 1904. New North American Diptera. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 6: 166192.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D. W. 1908. New genera and species of Diptera. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 9: 144148.Google Scholar
Czerny, L. 1904. Revision der Helomyziden. I. Tiel. Wien. ent. Ztg 23: 199–244, 263286.Google Scholar
de Meijere, J. C. H. 1914. Studien über sudostasiatische Diptera IX. Tijdschr. Ent. 57: 137275.Google Scholar
Duda, O. 1923. Die orientalischen und Australischen Drosophiliden-Arten (Dipteren) des Ungarischen National-Museums zu Budapest. Annls hist.-nat. Mus. natn. hung. 20: 2459.Google Scholar
Duda, O. 1924. Beitrag zur Systematik der Drosophiliden unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der paläarktischen und orientalischen Arten (Dipteren). Arch. Naturgesch., Abt. A, 90(3): 172234.Google Scholar
Duda, O. 1925. Die costaricanischen Drosophiliden (Dipteren) des Ungarischen National-Museums zu Budapest. Annls hist.-nut. Mus. natn. hung. 22: 149229.Google Scholar
Duda, O. 1934. Drosophilidae. Fliegen palaearkt. Reg. Vol. 6, Pt. 1, [Fam] 58 g.Google Scholar
Frey, R. 1932. Neue Diptera brachycera aus Finnland und angrenzenden Ländern, II. Notul. ent. 12: 8185.Google Scholar
Hackman, W. 1960. Diptera (Brachycera) Camillidae, Curtonotidae and Drosophilidae. S. Afr. Anim. Life 7: 381389.Google Scholar
Hackman, W. 1963. Ostafrikanische Curtonotiden und Drosophiliden (Dipt.). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk. 104: 14.Google Scholar
Hardy, D. E. 1959. A review of the genus Psuediastata Coquillett (Drosophilidae, Diptera). Proc. Hawaii. ent. Soc. 17: 7682.Google Scholar
Hardy, D. E. 1965. Diptera Cyclorrhapha II, Series Shizophora, section Acalypteratae I, Family Drosophilidae. Insects Hawaii, No. 12.Google Scholar
Hardy, D. E., and Wheeler, M. R.. 1960. Paracacoxenus, new genus with notes on Cacoxenus indagator Loew (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 53(3): 356359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendel, F. 1933. Neue acalyptrate musciden aus der paläarktischen Region (Dipt.). Dt. ent. Z. 1933: 3956.Google Scholar
Kertesz, K. 1899. Dipteren aus Neu-Guinea. Természetr. Füz. 22: 193194.Google Scholar
Kloet, G. S., and Hincks, W. D.. 1945. A check list of British insects. Arbroath, Scotland.Google Scholar
Knab, F. 1914. Drosophilidae with parasitic larvae. Insecutor Inscit. menstr. 2: 165169.Google Scholar
Kröber, O. 1912. Beitrag zur Biologie der Drosophilinae. Z. wiss. InsektBiol. 8(6–7): 235236.Google Scholar
Loew, H. 1858. Ueber Cacoxenus indagator nov. sp. und seine Verwandten. Wien. ent. Mschr. 2: 213222.Google Scholar
Loew, H. 1864. Gitona formosa, eine neue deutsche art. Wien. ent. Mschr. 8(11): 366368.Google Scholar
Loew, H. 1869. Diptera Americae septentrionalis indigena. Centuria octava. Berl. ent. Z. 13: 152.Google Scholar
[Also published in Loew, H. 1872. Diptera Americae septentrionalis indigena 2 (Centuria 6–10). Berlin.]Google Scholar
Macquart, J. 1835. Histoire naturelle des Insectes. Diptères, Tome deuxième. Diptera 2. In [Roret, N. E., ed.], Collection des suites à Buffon. Paris.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1926. Notes on Oriental Diptera, with descriptions of new species. Philipp. J. Sci. 31: 491512.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1933. Acalyptrata. Pp. 177391 (= fasc. 4). In British Museum (Natural History) Diptera of Patagonia and South Chile. Pt. 6.Google Scholar
Meigen, J. W. 1830. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europäichen Zweiflugeligan Insekten 6. (Gitona, p. 129). Hamm.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. T. 1943. Studies on the genetics of Drosophila III. I. The Drosophilidae of the southwest. Univ. Tex. Publs, No. 4313.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1933 a (1934). Contributions à l'étude de la faune du Mozambique. Voyage de M. P. Lesne (1928–1929). 13e.-note.Diptères (2e partie). Mém. Mus. Zool. Univ. Coimbra (1) 67: 580.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1933 b. Une nouvelle espèce de Gitona (Dipt.) de la Somalie italienne et note sur les drosophiles parasites. Boll. Soc. ent. ital. 65: 187190.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1934. Diptères (Brachycères) (Muscidae Acalypterae et Scatophagidae). Faune Fr. Vol. 28.Google Scholar
Steyskal, G. 1949. A new anomalous acalypterate fly (Diptera). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 44: 134137.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, A. H. 1921. The North American species of Drosophila. Publs Carnegie Instn, No. 301.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, A. H. 1942. The classification of the genus Drosophila, with descriptions of nine new species. Univ. Tex. Publs, No. 4213.Google Scholar
v. Frauenfeld, G. 1868. Acletotoxenus syrphoides eine neue Gattung und art der Dipteren aus der Familie der Drosophilinen. Verb. Zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 18: 150153.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. R. 1949. XIII. Taxonomic studies on the Drosophilidae. Univ. Tex. Publs, No. 4920.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. R. 1952 a. XI. The Drosophilidae of the Nearctic region exclusive of the genus Drosophila. Pp. 162218. In Patterson, J. T., Studies in the genetics of Drosophila. VII. Further articles on genetics, cytology and taxonomy. Univ. Tex. Publs, No. 5204.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. R. 1952 b. A key to the genera of Drosophilidae of the Pacific Islands (Diptera). Proc. Hawaii. ent. Soc. 14: 421423.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. R. 1960 a. A new subgenus and two new species of Psuediastata Coquillett (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 55: 6770.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. R. 1960 b. A new genus and two new species of Neotropical flies (Diptera; Drosophilidae). Ent. News 71: 207213.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. R. 1965. Family Drosophilidae. Pp. 760772. In Stone, A., Sabrosky, C. W., Wirth, W. W., Foote, R. H. and Coulson, J. R., A catalogue of the Diptera of America north of Mexico. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. No. 276. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. R., and Takada, H.. 1964. Drosophilidae. Insects Micronesia 14(6): 1242.Google Scholar
Wirth, W. W. 1965. Family Ephydridae. Pp. 734759. In Stone, et al. , A catalogue of the Diptera of America north of Mexico. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. No. 276. Government printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar