Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:36:33.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE USE OF MONOTERPENES AS KAIROMONES BY IPS LATIDENS (LECONTE) (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D.R. Miller  and
J.H. Borden
D.R. Miller*
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
J.H. Borden
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
*
1 Author to whom all correspondence should he addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The responses of Ips latidens (LeConte) to multiple-funnel traps baited with various monoterpenes were determined in stands of lodgepole pine in British Columbia. β-Phellandrene was attractive to I. latidens in the absence of the pheromone ipsenol. β-Phellandrene increased the attraction of I. latidens to ipsenol-baited traps while α-pinene, 3-carene, terpinolene, and myrcene reduced trap catches. Differential responses by males and females to sources of ipsenol with or without β-phellandrene suggest that the information conveyed to males differs from that conveyed to females. Species-specific responses to monoterpenes by I. latidens and three sympatric species of scolytids suggest that unique combinations of kairomones could be important in facilitating matings with conspecifics. Pheromones need not be the sole constituent of species-specific chemical messages.

Résumé

La réponse d’Ips latidens (LeConte) à divers monoterpènes placés dans des pièges à entonnoirs multiples a été déterminée dans des peuplements de pin lodgepole en Colombie britannique. β-Phellandrène a attiré I. latidens en absence de la phéromone ipsénol. β-Phellandrène a accru l’attraction de I. latidens vers des pièges contenant ipsenol alors que α-pinène, 3-carène, terpinolène et myrcène ont réduit les captures. Des niveaux de réponse différents pour mâles et femelles à des sources d’ipsénol, avec ou sans β-phellandrène, suggèrent que l’information transmise aux mâles diffère de celle transmise aux femelles. L’existence de réponses aux monoterpènes spécifiques à l’espèce, pour I. latidens et trois espèces sympatriques de scolytes, suggèrent que des combinaisons uniques de kairomones pourraient être importantes dans la facilitation de l’accouplement avec des individus con-spécifiques. Les phéromones ne sont pas nécessairement les seules composantes des messages chimiques spécifiques à l’espèce.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 122 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 301 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borden, J.H. 1967. Factors influencing the response of Ips confusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to male attractant. Can. Ent. 99: 1164–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H. 1982. Aggregation pheromones. pp. 74–139in Mitton, J.B., and Sturgeon, K.B. (Eds.), Bark Beetles in North American Conifers. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Bright, D.E. Jr., 1976. The bark beetles of Canada and Alaska (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Agric. Can. Publ. 1576.Google Scholar
Byers, J.A. 1983. Sex-specific responses to aggregation pheromone: regulation of colonization density in the bark beetle Ips paraconfusus. J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.A., Birgerrson, G., Löfqvist, J., and Bergström, G.. 1988. Synergistic pheromones and monoterpenes enable aggregation and host recognition by a bark beetle. Naturwiss. 75: 153–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.A., Lanne, B.S., Löfqvist, J., Schlyter, F., and Bergström, G.. 1985. Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility of pine shoot beetles. Naturwiss. 72: 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chénier, J.V.R., and Philogène, B.J.R.. 1989. Field responses of certain forest Coleoptera to conifer monoterpenes and ethanol. J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 1729–1745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickens, J.C., Payne, T.L., Ryker, L.C., and Rudinsky, J.A.. 1984. Single cell responses of the Douglas-fir beetle Dendroctonus pseudotsuga Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromones and host odors. J. Chem. Ecol. 10: 583–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furniss, M.M., and Livingston, R.L.. 1979. Inhibition by ipsenol of pine engraver attraction in northern Idaho. Environ. Ent. 8: 369–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furniss, M.M., and Schmitz, R.F.. 1971. Comparative attraction of Douglas-fir beetles to frontalin and tree volatiles. U.S. For. Serv. Res. Pap. INT-96.Google Scholar
Furniss, R.L., and Carolin, V.M.. 1980. Western forest insects. U.S. For. Serv. Misc. Publ. 1339.Google Scholar
Harrington, T.C. 1983. Verticicladiella wageneri: taxonomy and vector relations. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Kirkendall, L.R. 1983. The evolution of mating systems in bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 77: 293–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, B.S. 1983. A multiple-funnel trap for scolytid beetles. Can. Ent. 115: 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D.R., and Borden, J.H.. 1985. Life history and biology of Ips latidens (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 117: 859–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D.R., Madden, J.L., and Borden, J.H.. 1986. Primary attraction of Ips latidens (LeConte)and Hylastes gracilis LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to high-girdled lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelmann. Can. Ent. 118: 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirov, N.T. 1961. Composition of gum turpentines of pines. U.S. For. Serv. Tech. Bull. 1239: 87–92.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J.A., Novák, V., and Svihra, P.. 1971 a. Pheromone and terpene attraction in the bark beetle Ips typographus L. Experentia 27: 161–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudinsky, J.A., Novák, V., and Svihra, P.. 1971 b. Attraction of the bark beetle Ips typographus L. to terpenes and a male-produced pheromone. Z. angew. Ent. 67: 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlyter, F., Lofqvist, J., and Byers, J.A.. 1987. Behavioural sequence in the attraction of the bark beetle Ips typographus to pheromone sources. Physiol. Ent. 12: 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, L.M. 1988. Attraction of the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda and some other bark- and wood-living beetles, to the host volatiles α-pinene and ethanol. Entomologia exp. appl. 46: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, L.M., and Eidmann, H.H.. 1987. Gallery initiation by Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on Scots pine trees baited with host volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 13: 1591–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, L.M., and Lindelöw, A.. 1989. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol. J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 807–817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrimpton, D.M. 1972. Variation in the extractives from lodgepole pine sapwood and heartwood. For. Can. Inf. Rep. NOR-X-18.Google Scholar
Shrimpton, D.M. 1973. Extractives associated with wound response of lodgepole pine attacked by the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Can. J. Bot. 51: 527–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svihra, P. 1982. Influence of opposite sex on attraction produced by pioneer sex of four bark beetle species cohabiting pine in the southern United States. J. Chem. Ecol. 8: 373–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomescu, N., Dusa, L., Stan, Gh., Opreanu, I., Hodosan, F., and Tautan, L.. 1979. Response of Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) to aggregation pheromone in mixture with alpha pinene. Rev. Roum. Biol., Biol. Anim. 24: 177–181.Google Scholar
Volz, H.-A. 1988. Monoterpenes governing host selection in the bark beetles Hylurgops palliatus and Tomicus piniperda. Entomologia exp. appl. 47: 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, R.A. 1972 a. Aggregation behaviour of the beetle Ips grandicollis in response to host-produced attractants. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, R.A. 1972 b. Aggregation behaviour of the beetle Ips grandicollis in response to insect-produced attractants. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 1001–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, R.A. 1972 c. Response of the beetle, Ips grandicollis, to combinations of hot and insect produced attractants. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 1403–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.L., Stark, R.W., Silverstein, R.M., and Rodin, J.O.. 1967. Nature 215: 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S.L. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Natur. Mem. 6.Google Scholar