Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T19:07:00.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UNCERTAIN FATE OF SPOT INFESTATIONS OF THE MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE, DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE HOPKINS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

John H. Borden
John H. Borden
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Large infestations of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), reportedly arise from small, spot infestations that expand, multiply, and eventually coalesce (Safranyik et al. 1974). If these spot infestations can be located and eradicated, the development of outbreaks may be delayed, or even precluded. The principal means of eradication of such spots in forests of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelmann, in British Columbia is single tree disposal (B.C. Ministry of Forests 1987). This may be accomplished by treating with an arsenical herbicide within 3–4 weeks after attack, cutting, bucking, piling, and burning trees before brood emergence, or extraction and processing of brood trees before emergence.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 125 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 167 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borden, J.H., Chong, L.J., Pratt, K.E.G., and Gray, D.R.. 1983. The application of behaviour-modifying chemicals to contain infestation of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae. Forestry Chronicle 59: 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H., Hunt, D.W.A., Miller, D.R., and Slessor, K.N.. 1986. Orientation in forest Coleoptera: An uncertain outcome of responses by individual beetles to variable stimuli. pp. 97–109.in Payne, T.L., Birch, M.C., and Kennedy, C.E.J. (Eds.), Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
British Columbia Ministry of Forests. 1987. Protection Manual. Vol. II. Victoria, B.C.Google Scholar
Geiszler, D.R., Gallucci, V.F., and Gara, R.I.. 1980. Modeling the dynamics of mountain pine beetle aggregation in a lodgepole pine stand. Oecologia 46: 244–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffa, K.F., and Berryman, A.A.. 1983. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecological Monographs 53: 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safranyik, L. 1986. Effect of climatic factors on development, survival and life cycle of the mountain pine beetle. pp. 14–24.in Hall, P.M., and Maher, T.F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium, Apr. 16–18. 1985, Smithers, B.C. B.C. Ministry of Forests, Pest Management Report 7.Google Scholar
Safranyik, L., Shrimpton, D.M., and Whitney, H.S.. 1974. Management of lodgepole pine to reduce losses from the mountain pine beetle. Environment Canada, Forestry Service, Pacific Forest Research Centre, Forestry Technical Report 1.Google Scholar
Safranyik, L., Silversides, R., McMullan, L.H., and Linton, D.A.. 1989. An empirical approach to modeling the local dispersal of the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in relation to sources of attraction, wind direction and speed. Journal of Applied Entomology 108: 498–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar