Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:00:20.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TEMPERATURE MODIFICATION OF MALE SEX PHEROMONE RESPONSE AND FACTORS AFFECTING FEMALE CALLING IN HOLOMELINA IMMACULATA (LEPIDOPTERA: ARCTIIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. T. Cardé  and
W. L. Roelofs
R. T. Cardé
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva
W. L. Roelofs
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Holomelina immaculata (Reakirt) periodicity of male attraction to synthetic 2-methylheptadecane, the female-produced sex pheromone, is modified by temperature cues. In the field this response interval occurs from approximately sunset to about 4 h after sunset on a warm day and night (30° to 17 °C) and for the 2 h prior to sunset on a cool day and night (23° to 16 °C).

In laboratory studies at 24 °C female H. immaculata placed in continual scotophase have an endogenous calling rhythm, but they are apparently inhibited from calling by constant photophase. In 16:8 or 12:12 light–dark cycles at 24 °C calling occurs from the 2nd to the 6th hour of scotophase, whereas at 15 °C calling takes place from the initiation to the 5th hour of scotophase. The critical cues governing initiation of calling behaviour are lights-off or a temperature decrease cue, and a temperature decrease signal overrides the apparent inhibitory effect of continual photophase.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 12 , December 1973 , pp. 1505 - 1512
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batiste, W. C. 1971. A timing sex-pheromone trap with special reference to codling moth collections. J. econ. Ent. 63: 915–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, U. E. and Smithwick, E. B.. 1968. Production and release of sex attractant by the female Indian-meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 1260–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardé, R. T. 1971 (unpub.). Aspects of reproductive isolation in the Holomelina aurantiaca complex (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Comeau, A. 1971 (unpub.). Physiology of sex pheromone attraction in Tortricidae and other Lepidoptera (Heterocera). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Riddiford, L. M. and Williams, C. M.. 1971. Role of the corpora cardiaca in the behavior of saturniid moths. I. Release of the sex pheromone. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 140: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelofs, W. and Cardé, R.. 1971. Hydrocarbon sex pheromone in tiger moths (Arctiidae). Science 171: 684–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saario, C. A., Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K.. 1970. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XIX. Effect of environmental and seasonal factors on captures of males of Trichoplusiani in pheromone-baited traps. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 667–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Lucuik, G. S.. 1972. Factors affecting calling by female eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 104: 1751–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H. and Hale, R. L.. 1965. Mass rearing of the larvae of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial medium. J. econ. Ent. 58: 522–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sower, L. L., Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K.. 1970. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XXI. Light: dark cycle regulation and light inhibition of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusia ni. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 1090–1092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sower, L. L., Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K.. 1971. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XXV. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on circadian rhythms of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusia ni. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 488–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traynier, R. M. M. 1970. Sexual behaviour of the Mediterranean flour moth, Anagasta kühniella: Some influences of age, photoperiod, and light intensity. Can. Ent. 102: 534–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar