Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:23:34.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ARGENTINE MELANOPLINES (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE) TO ENTOMOPOXVIRUSES (ENTOMOPOXVIRINAE) FROM NORTH AMERICAN AND AFRICAN GRASSHOPPERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C.E. Lange  and
D.A. Streett
C.E. Lange
Affiliation:
Rangeland Insect Laboratory, USDA/ARS, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA 59717–0366
D.A. Streett
Affiliation:
Rangeland Insect Laboratory, USDA/ARS, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA 59717–0366
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Grasshoppers are responsible for considerable agricultural losses in different parts of Argentina (C.O.P.R. 1982). Most of the pest species in Argentina belong to the subfamily Melanoplinae. It is generally accepted that South American melanoplines are derived from a nearctic stock that crossed the Panamanian land bridge (Carbonell 1977). The genus Dichroplus Stål is one of the largest genera within the South American Melanoplinae (Ronderos and Cigliano 1990). Dichroplus contains several economically important species and is believed to be closely related to the nearctic genus Melanoplus Stål (Vickery 1989).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 125 , Issue 6 , December 1993 , pp. 1127 - 1129
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, W.S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbonell, C.S. 1977. Origin, evolution, and distribution of the neotropical Acridomorph fauna (Orthoptera): A preliminary hypothesis. Revista Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 36: 153–175.Google Scholar
C.O.P.R. (Centre for Overseas Pest Research). 1982. The Locust and Grasshopper Agricultural Manual. London. 690 pp.Google Scholar
Fresa, R. 1971. El hongo Entomophthora grylli en tucuras. Revista Investigación Agropecuaria 5: 83–88.Google Scholar
Henry, J.E. 1985. Melanoplus spp. pp. 451–464 in Singh, P., and Moore, R.F. (Eds.), Handbook of Insect Rearing, Vol. 1. Elsevier Science Publishers, BV Amsterdam. 488 pp.Google Scholar
Lange, C.E. 1986. Crianza en cautiverio de Dichroplus elongatus (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Melanoplinae). Neotrópica 32: 147–148.Google Scholar
Lange, C.E. 1992. Espectro hospedador natural y persistencia de Perezia dichroplusae Lange y Nosema locustae Canning (Protozoa: Microspora) en acridios argentinos. Neotrópica 38: 65–74.Google Scholar
Oma, E.A., and Henry, J.E.. 1986. Host relationships of entomopoxviruses isolated from grasshoppers. pp. 48–49 in Proceeding Grasshopper Symposium, ND Extension Service. 94 pp.Google Scholar
Ronderos, R.A., and Cigliano, M.M.. 1990. Notas para una revisión del género Dichroplus Stål. I. Boliviacris, nuevo género de Dichropli (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Melanoplinae). Boletín Sociedad Biología Concepción 61: 135–144.Google Scholar
Streett, D.A., and Henry, J.E.. 1990. Microbial control of locusts and grasshoppers in the semi-arid tropics. pp. 21–27in Proceedings of the Fifth International Meeting of the Orthopterists' Society, Valsain, Spain. Boletin Sanidad Vegetal Plagas (Fuera de serie) 20.Google Scholar
Vickery, V.R. 1989. The biogeography of Canadian Grylloptera and Orthoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 389–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, S.A., Streett, D.A., and Henry, J.E.. 1992. Temporal patterns of mortality from an entomopoxvirus and strategies for control of the migratory grasshopper (Melanoplus sanguinipes F.). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 60: 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar