Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:50:43.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A STUDY OF PHEROMONE TRAP CATCHES IN RELATION TO CODLING MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA: OLETHREUTIDAE) DAMAGE12

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. Riedl  and
B. A. Croft
H. Riedl
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing
B. A. Croft
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A sex pheromone trap was studied as a quantitative sampling device in a biological monitoring scheme for codling moth populations in Michigan apple orchards. Factors influencing trap efficiency and the relationship of trap catch to adult moth density and the overall seasonal dynamics of L. pomonella are considered.

By correlating seasonal male moth catches to absolute infestation levels at harvest it was possible to indicate the density response of male moth catches in the pheromone trap (Sectar 1). Catch response was non-linear and the trap ceased to be indicative of higher infestation levels when accumulative catch exceeded about 100 moths/trap. Also, accumulative trap catches from the first few weeks of the season (before damage appeared) correlated well with eventual infestation levels indicating possible use of the pheromone trap as a predictive tool. Of the many factors influencing trap catch size the number of moth productive trees serviced by a trap (trap/tree ratio) was shown to be of critical importance.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 5 , May 1974 , pp. 525 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baskerville, G. L. and Emin, P.. 1969. Rapid estimation of heat accumulation from maximum and minimum temperatures. Ecology 50: 514–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batiste, W. C. 1970. A timing pheromone trap with special reference to codling moth collections. J. econ. Ent. 63: 915–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batiste, W. C. et al. 1973. Codling moth: estimating time of first egg hatch in the field — a supplement to sex-attractant traps in integrated control. Envivon. Ent. 2: 387–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, A. D. 1931. Some field observations on codling moth behavior. J. econ. Ent. 24: 1137–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyer, J. R. 1934. Further observations on limiting factors in codling moth bait trap and light trap attractancy. J. econ. Ent. 27: 722–723.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W. 1963. The life history of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Australian capital territory. Aust. J. Zool. 11: 323–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, P. A. 1922. Relation of temperature to development of the codling moth. J. econ. Ent. 15: 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLellan, C. R. 1972. Sex ratio in three stages of field collected codling moth. Can. Ent. 104: 1661–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, H. F. and Davis, W. W.. 1971. A progress report on the use of female-baited traps as indicators of codling moth populations. J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 68: 11–14.Google Scholar
Madsen, H. F. and Vakenti, J. M.. 1972. Codling moths: female-baited and synthetic pheromone traps as population indicators. Environ. Ent. 1: 554–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, H. F. and Vakenti, J. M.. 1973. Codling moth: use of CodlemoneR-baited traps and visual detection of entries to determine need of sprays. Environ. Ent. 2: 677–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, R. O. and Comeau, A.. 1972. Piégeage de la pyrale de la pomme, Laspeyresia pomonella (L.), dans le vergers du sud-ouest du Québec au moyen d'une phéromone sexuelle synthétique. Ann. Soc. ent. Québ. 17: 7–19.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W. L. et al. 1971. Sex attractant of the codling moth: characterization with electro-antennogramm technique. Science 174: 297–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russ, K. 1961. Einfluss wichtiger Witterungsfaktoren auf die Flugtaetigkeit des Apfelwicklers Carpocapsa pomonella L. Pflanzenschutzberichte 27: 67–82.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1963. Pheromones. Scient. Am. 208: 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, T. T. Y. et al. 1971. Populations of codling moths on Washington Island, Wisconsin, in 1970. J. econ. Ent. 64: 1410–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodside, A. M. 1944. Codling moth infestation at different heights in apple trees. Bull. Va agric. Exp. Stn, No. 360. 10 pp.Google Scholar