Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:58:52.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STUDIES ON NEARCTIC CRASPEDOLEPTA ENDERLEIN, 1921 (HOMOPTERA: PSYLLOIDEA): EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Alan R. P. Journet  and
V. R. Vickery
Alan R. P. Journet
Affiliation:
Lyman Entomological Museum and Research Laboratory and Department of Entomology, Macdonald College, McGill University, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Quebec H0A 1C0
V. R. Vickery
Affiliation:
Lyman Entomological Museum and Research Laboratory and Department of Entomology, Macdonald College, McGill University, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Quebec H0A 1C0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, a discussion of aspects of the external morphology of Nearctic Craspedolepta Enderlein, 1921 (Homoptera: Psylloidea) is presented. The discussion concerns those structures of the head, thorax, abdomen, and genitalia which were investigated during the course of a systematic and taxonomic study of the genus. It includes, where appropriate, reference to and comparison with other publications on psyllid morphology, especially where the current study illuminates previous discussions of psyllids.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 1 , 01 January 1978 , pp. 13 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, J. C. and Jensen, D. D.. 1966. Sexual dimorphism in nymphs of Psylla pyricola (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 1292–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnemaison, L. and Missonnier, J.. 1956. Le Psylle du Poirier (Psylla pyri L.). Morphologie et biologic. Methodes de Lutte. Annls Inst. natn. Rech. agron. Serie Epiphytes II: 263–331.Google Scholar
Brittain, W. H. 1923. The morphology and synonymy of Psylla mali Schmidberger. Proc. Acadian ent. Soc. 8: 23–51.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. S. 1936. Seven new species of the genus Aphalara (Homoptera: Chermidae). Ohio J. Sci. 36: 220–224.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. S. 1938. The jumping plant lice of Ohio (Homoptera: Chermidae). Ohio biol. Surv. Bull. 34 (Vol. VI; 5): 228–281.Google Scholar
Crawford, D. L. 1914. A monograph of the jumping plant lice or Psyllidae of the New World. Smithson. Inst. U.S. natn. Mus. Bull. 85. 186 pp.Google Scholar
Dobreanu, E. and Manolache, C.. 1959. Cercetari sistematice asupra genulici Trioza (Psylloidea-Triozinae) pi baza morfologiei organului copulator. Communicarile Acad. Repub. Populare Romine 9: 905–914.Google Scholar
Dobreanu, E. and Manolache, C.. 1960. Cercetari asupra organului copulator la specule de Aphalaridae din republica populare romina. Communicarile Acad. Repub. Populare Romine 10: 135–142.Google Scholar
DuPorte, E. M. 1959. Manual of insect morphology. Reinhold. 224 pp.Google Scholar
Dobreanu, E. and Manolache, C.. 1965 a. The role of morphology in taxonomy. Annls Soc. ent. Québ. 101: 91–97.Google Scholar
Dobreanu, E. and Manolache, C.. 1965 b. The lateral and ventral sclerites of the insect thorax. Can. J. Zool. 43: 141–154.Google Scholar
Eastop, V. F. 1958. Some neglected taxonomic characters of the Psyllidae (Homoptera). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 94: 18–19.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F. 1940. The myth of the thoracic sternites in insects. Microentomology 5: 87–90.Google Scholar
Gustafson, J. F. 1950. The origin and evolution of the genitalia in insects. Microentomology 15: 35–67.Google Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1949 a. The subfamily Liviinae Löw, of the homopterous Family Psyllidae:— Part II: a) Subfamily diagnosis; b) an outline of the genera and species of the Liviinae; c) the biology of Livia juncorum Latr. and a description of two new species of the Liviinae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 12(2): 240–271.Google Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1949 b. The aphalaran genera, Aphalara Förster, Craspedolepta Enderlein and Metaphalara Crawford, with special reference to the European species of Aphalara: Hemiptera-Homoptera family Psyllidae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 12(2): 782–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1949 c. Subfamily separation in the homopterous Psyllidae–I. General introductory notes with a special consideration of the major systems of classification in the Psyllidae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 12(2): 802–810.Google Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1951 a. Subfamily separation in the homopterous Psyllidae–II. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 12(4): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1951 b. Notes on Scandinavian Psyllidae: Part I. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 12(4): 657–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1951 c. Preliminary notes on the ancestry, family relations, evolution and speciation of the homopterous Psyllidae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 12(4): 1057–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1952. The number and distribution of the spiracles of the adult psyllid. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 12(5): 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1955 a. The venation of the homopterous tegmen. Part I. Proc. Univ. Durham phil. Soc. 12: 42–62.Google Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1955 b. Part II. The general character of the tegminal venation of the Homoptera. Proc. Univ. Durham phil. Soc. 12: 102–127.Google Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1958. Subfamily separation in the homopterous Psyllidae. III. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 13(1): 561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslop Harrison, G. 1961. Psyllid taxonomy and classification. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 13(3): 497–504.Google Scholar
Heymons, R. 1899. Beiträge zur Morphologie und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Rhynchoten. Nova Acta Leap-Carol. Deut. Akad. 74: 349–456.Google Scholar
Journet, A. R. P. and Vickery, V. R.. 1978. Studies on Nearctic Craspedolepta Enderlein, 1921 (Homoptera: Psylloidea): Taxonomic relationships within the superfamily. Can. ent. 110: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimaszewski, S. M. 1963. Krajowe gatunki z podrodzin Liviinae i Aphalarinae. Fragm. faun. 10: 260–270.Google Scholar
Klyver, F. D. 1931 a. Chermidae from Utah, Nevada, and Arizona, including three new species (Homoptera), Pan-Pacific. Ent. 7: 130–141.Google Scholar
Klyver, F. D. 1931 b. New records and two new species of Chermidae from British Columbia and Washington, with biological notes. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 8: 10–15.Google Scholar
Klyver, F. D. 1932. Biological notes and new records of Chermidae of North America. Ent. News 43: 7–12, 33–40, 70–75.Google Scholar
Loginova, M. M. 1961. A revision of the species of the genera Aphalara Frst. and Craspedolepta Enderl. (Homoptera, Psylloidea) in the fauna of the U.S.S.R.I. Ent. Rev. 40: 328–341.Google Scholar
Loginova, M. M. 1962. New psyllids (Homoptera, Psylloidea) from the U.S.S.R. Zool. Inst. Trudy 30: 185–220.Google Scholar
Loginova, M. M. 1963. Revision of the species of the genera Aphalara Frst. and Craspedolepta Enderl. (Homoptera, Psylloidea) in the fauna of the U.S.S.R. Ent. Rev. 42: 334–446.Google Scholar
Loginova, M. M. 1964. New and little known psyllids from Kazakhstan. Considerations regarding systematics and classification, Psylloidea (Homoptera). Zool. Inst. Trudy 34: 52–112.Google Scholar
Löw, F. 1876. Zur Biologie und Characteristik der Psylloden nebst Beschreibung zweier neuer Species des Gattung Psylla. Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 26: 187–216.Google Scholar
Matsuda, R. 1958. On the origin of the external genitalia of insects. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 51: 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, R. 1965. Morphology and evolution of the insect head. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 4. 334 pp.Google Scholar
Matsuda, R. 1970. Morphology and evolution of the insect thorax. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 76. 431 pp.Google Scholar
Michener, C. D. 1944. A comparative study of the abdominal appendages of the eighth and ninth abdominal segments of insects. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 37: 336–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkievitz, S. 1924. The apple sucker, Psylla mali Schm. Part I, morphology. Bull. int. Acad. Polonnaise Sci. Lett. (Ser. B, Cracow) 7–8: 589–603.Google Scholar
Muir, F. 1930. Notes on certain controversial points of morphology of the abdomen and genitalia of Psyllidae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 10(5): 545–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, H. J. 1942. Uber Bau und Funktion des Legeapparates der Zikaden (Homoptera Cicadina) (Zugleich erster Teil der Beiträge zur Biologie mitteleuropäischer Zikaden). Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 38: 534–629.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. X. 1970. Recherches sur la morphologie et la biologie de Psyllopsis fraxini (Homoptera, Psyllidae). Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 6(3): 757–773.Google Scholar
Ossiannilsson, F. 1963. Notes on British psyllids (Hem.-Hom.). Entomologist 96: 249–257.Google Scholar
Ossiannilsson, F., Russell, L. M., and Weber, H.. 1970. Homoptera. In Taxonomists glossary of genitalia of insects. (ed.) Tuxen. S-H. Service Agency, Inc.Google Scholar
Patch, E. M. 1909. Homology of the wing veins of the Aphididae, Psyllidae, Aleurodidae, and Coccidae. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 2: 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlee, D. 1969 a. Sperma-Ubertragung (und andere Merkmale) in ihrer Bedeutung für das phylogenetische System der Stemorryncha. Phylogenetische Studien an Hemiptera I. Psylliformes (Psyllina und Aleyrodina) als monophyletische Gruppe. Z. Morph Ökol. Tiere 64: 95–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlee, D. 1969 b. Bau und Funktion des Aedeagus bei Psyllina und deren Bedeutung für systematische und phylogenetische Untersuchungen (Insecta, Hemiptera). Phylogenetische Studien an Hemiptera III. Entkräftung eines Arguments gegen die Monophylie der Sternorrhyncha. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 64: 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scudder, G. G. E. 1957. The ovipositor of the Thysanura and its interpretation in the higher orders. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (Ser. C) 22: 47–48.Google Scholar
Scudder, G. G. E. 1959. The female genitalia of the Heteroptera: morphology and bearing on classification. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 111: 405–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scudder, G. G. E. 1961 a. The comparative morphology of the insect ovipositor. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 113: 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scudder, G. G. E. 1961 b. The functional morphology and interpretation of the insect ovipositor. Can. Ent. 93: 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smreczynski, S. 1954. Material do fauny pluskwiakow (Hemiptera). Polski Fragm. faun. VII(1): 135–145.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1933. Morphology of the insect abdomen. Part II. The genital ducts and the ovipositor. Smithson. misc. Collns 89(8). 148 pp.Google Scholar
Scudder, G. G. E. 1935. Principles of insect morphology. McGraw Hill. 667 pp.Google Scholar
Stough, H. B. 1910. The hackberry psylla, Pachypsylla celtidis-mammae Riley. A study in comparative morphology. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 5(9): 121–265.Google Scholar
Sulc, K. 1913. Zur Kenntnis einiger Psylla Arten aus dem Ungarischen National Museum in Budapest. Annls hist.-nat. Hung. (Budapest) 11: 409–435.Google Scholar
Tremblay, E. 1965. Studio morfo-biologico sulla Trioza tremblayi Wagner (Hemiptera-Homoptera, Psyllidae). Boll. Lab. Ent. agr. Portici 23: 37–136.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. 1947. Beitrag zur Systematik der deutschen Aphalarinae. Verein naturw. HeimForsch. (Hamburg) 29: 55–71.Google Scholar
Weber, H. 1929. Kopf und Thorax von Psylla mali Schmidb. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 14: 60–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, H. 1930. Biologie der Hemipteren. Springer, Berlin. 543 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcke, J. 1941. Biologie en Morphologie von Psylla buxi L. Tijdschr. Plziekt. 47: 41–89.Google Scholar
Witlaczil, E. 1885. Die Anatomie der Psylliden. Z. Wiss. Zool. 42: 560–658.Google Scholar