Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:32:41.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Ichneumonid-Sarcophagid Interactions in the Gypsy Moth Porthetria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert W. Campbell
Robert W. Campbell
Affiliation:
Forest Insect Laboratory, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, New Haven, Connecticut
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four ichneumonid species, Itoplectis conquisitor (Say), Pimpla pedalis Cress., Theronia atalantae (Poda), and Theronia hilaris (Say), were seen attacking the gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (L.), in the Town of Glenville, Schenectady County, New York. These species stung and killed many more host pupae than they successfully parasitized (success here being measured by the development of an ichneumonid offspring within the host). The ratio between the total number of hosts stung by ichneumonids and the number of ichneumonid offspring emerging was different for each of the three primary ichneumonids studied, ranging from 4 to 1 for T. atalantae to more than 200 to 1 for I. conquisitor.

The sarcophagids associated with the gypsy moth, although apparently parasitic, are largely scavengers. Their attacks almost always follow those of ichneumonids. Since the sting by an ichneumonid kills the host but is not always discernible, the number of pupae containing sarcophagid larvae has been used to, indicate the true effects of ichneumonids on the host population.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 95 , Issue 4 , April 1963 , pp. 337 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, A. P., and Coppel, H. C.. 1953. Studies on dipterous parasites of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). I. Sarcophaga aldrichi Parker (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Canad. J. Zool. 31: 374–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bess, H. A. 1961. Population ecology of the gypsy moth Porthetria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantridae). Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 646. 43 pp.Google Scholar
Burgess, A. F., and Crossman, S. S.. 1929. Imported insect enemies of the gipsy moth and brown-tail moth. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. 86. 148 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. W. 1961. Population dynamics of the gypsy moth. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. 1943. The importance of host-feeding by adult parasites in the reduction of host populations. J. Econ. Ent. 36: 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, H. R. 1961. Studies on female sarcophagid flies: I. Sarcophaga aldrichi Parker, hinei Aldrich, houghi Aldrich, and Agria affinis (Fallen). Canad. Ent. 93: 781–785.Google Scholar
Howard, L. O., and Fiske, W. F.. 1911. The importation into the United States of the parasites of the gipsy moth and brown-tail moth. U.S. Bur. Ent. Bul. 91. 344 pp.Google Scholar
Johnston, F. A. 1915. Asparagus-beetle egg parasite. J. Agr. Res. 4: 303–313.Google Scholar
Leius, K. 1961. Influences of food on fecundity and longevity of adults of Itoplectis conquisitor (Say) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Canad. Ent. 93: 771–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. R. 1916. Sarcophagidae of New England: Genus Sarcophaga. J. Econ. Ent. 9: 438–441.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. L. 1910. Investigations into the habits of certain sarcophagidae. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Ent. Tech. Series 19: 25–32.Google Scholar