Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:49:26.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Factors that Distort the Sex Ratio of the Gypsy Moth Porthetria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert W. Campbell
Affiliation:
Forest Insect Laboratory, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, New Haven, Connecticut

Abstract

During a study on the population dynamics of the gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (L.), conducted in the Town of Glenville, New York, some factors were found to affect the sexes differentially. The importance of this differential mortality is indicated by the fact that 78 per cent of the variation in the logarithm of an index of population trend (the ratio of population density from year to year) was associated with the logarithm of adult sex ratio.

Disease and desiccation during instars IV-VI and among pre-pupae were strongly selective against the female insects. This differential mortality caused a change in the pupal sex ratio from about 70 per cent females where no disease occurred to less than 25 per cent female pupae following an epizoötic. Ichneumonids, on the other hand, usually killed more male pupae than females, except when host size was reduced by excessive larval density and competition. The net result from this series of factors that distort the sex ratio has been to produce adult sex ratios varying from more than 80 per cent female moths to only 2 per cent females.

In this host species, as in most other animals, it seems that the population consequences of a mortality factor that kills the host sexes in different proportions should be evaluated in terms of the more critical (female) sex destroyed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bess, H. A. 1961. Population ecology of the gypsy moth Porthetria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantridae). Conn. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 646. 43 pp.Google Scholar
Bird, F. T. 1961. Transmission of some insect viruses with particular reference to ovarial transmission and its importance in the development of epizootics. J. Insect Path. 3: 352380.Google Scholar
Burgess, A. F., and Crossman, S. S.. 1929. Imported insect enemies of the gipsy moth and the brown-tail moth. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. 86. 148 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. W. 1963a. Some ichneumonid-sarcophagid interactions in the gypsy moth Porthetria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Canad. Ent. 95: 337345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. W. 1963b. The role of disease and desiccation in the population dynamics of the gypsy moth Porthetria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Canad. Ent. 95: 426435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowden, P. B. 1962. Parasites and predators of forest insects liberated in the United States through 1960. U.S. Dept. Agr. Handbook 226. 70 pp.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F., and Miller, C. A.. 1954. The development of life tables for the spruce budworm. Canad. J. Zool. 32: 283301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhaus, E. A. 1954. The effects of disease on insect populations. Hilgardia 23: 197261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, K. E. F. 1961. Mathematical models for use in insect pest control. Canad. Ent. Supp. 19. 62 pp.Google Scholar