Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:01:51.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ROLE OF ABDOMINAL AIR-SACS DURING FEEDING IN THE STABLE FLY, STOMOXYS CALCITRANS (DIPTERA: MUSCIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. M. K. W. Lee  and
D. M. Davies
R. M. K. W. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1
D. M. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In “higher” flies (e.g. Musca dornestica L.), a pair of large air-sacs is found in the anterior region of the abdomen (Hewitt 1914). The main function of these air-sacs appears to be to maintain the extended external shape of the abdomen in newly emerged flies, because as the fat-bodies in both sexes, and also eggs in the female, grow, these air-sacs decrease in size, thus allowing room for these growing organs (Evans 1935). These air-sacs, and those elsewhere in the thorax and head, were believed to give buoyancy for insect in flight, to reduce the volume of circulating blood, and(or) increase the volume of the “tidal air” which is renewed at each respiration (see Wigglesworth 1965 for review). In our recent studies on the feeding of S. calcitrans, we noted that the change in the size of the abdominal air-sacs, besides making room for the growing abdominal organs, may minimize change in abdominal volume during feeding and digestion.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 6 , 01 June 1978 , pp. 671 - 672
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Evans, A. C. 1935. Some notes on the biology and physiology of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia sericata Meig. Bull. ent. Res. 26: 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmsen, R. 1973. The nature of the establishment barrier for Trypanosoma brucei in the gut of Glossina pallidipes. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 67: 364–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewitt, C. G. 1914. The house-fly Musca domestica Linn. Its structure, habits, development, relation to disease and control. Cambridge University Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzina, O. S. 1942. On the gonotrophic relationships in Stomoxys calcitrans L. and Haematobia stimulans L. (In Russian.) Med. Parasit., Moscow. 11: 70–78. (English translation courtesy Dr.Anderson, J. R..)Google Scholar
Lester, H. M. O. and Lloyd, L.. 1928. Notes on the process of digestion in tsetse-flies. Bull. ent. Res. 19: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloo, S. K. and Kutuza, S. B.. 1970. Feeding and crop emptying in Glossina brevipalpis Newstead. Acta Trop. 27: 356–377.Google ScholarPubMed
Tawfik, M. S. 1968. Feeding mechanism and the forces involved in some blood-sucking insects. Quaest. ent. 4: 92–111.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. 1965. The principles of insect physiology. Methuen, London.Google Scholar