Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:25:43.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION OF NEARCTIC SPECIES OF CEROMYA ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY (DIPTERA: TACHINIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

James E. O’Hara
James E. O’Hara
Affiliation:
Biological Resources Division, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nine species of Ceromya Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Tachinidae: Siphonini) are recognized in the Nearctic region, including four new species, and one described species known previously only from the Palearctic region. The species are arranged into three species groups, with each group hypothesized to be monophyletic and each containing extralimital members. The three species groups and nine Nearctic species are as follows: the bicolor-group with C. bicolor (Meigen) (a Holarctic species newly recorded from the Nearctic region); the flaviseta-group with C. Ontario (Curran) and C. palloris (Coquillett); and the americana-group with C. americana (Townsend), C. balli sp.nov. (type-locality Masham Township, Quebec, Canada), C. elyii (Walton), C. flava sp.nov. (type-locality Masham Township, Quebec, Canada), C. oriens sp.nov. (type-locality Masham Township, Quebec, Canada), and C. occidentalis sp.nov. (type-locality Lakelse Lake, British Columbia, Canada). The bicolor-group has an Old World – Nearctic distribution, the flaviseta-group has an European–Nearctic distribution, and the americana-group has a Neotropical–Nearctic distribution. Adults of the nine Nearctic species of Ceromya are keyed and described, known hosts are listed (including corrections to published records), distributions are mapped, and taxonomically useful features are illustrated.

Résumé

Dans la région néarctique, neuf espèces de Ceromya Robineau-Descoidy (Diptera : Tachinidae : Siphonini) sont reconnues, dont quatre sont nouvelles et une, déjà décrite, n’était connue à ce jour que dans la région paléarctique. Les espèces sont réparties en trois groupes et chaque groupe est présumé monophylétique et peut contenir des espèces qui vivent hors des limites de répartition géographique de la majorité des espèces du groupe. Les trois groupes d’espèces et neuf espèces néarctiques sont : le groupe bicolor, qui contient C. bicolor (Meigen) (une espèce holarctique récemment trouvée dans la région néarctique), le groupe flaviseta, qui contient C. Ontario (Curran) et C. palloris (Coquillett), et le groupe americana qui contient C. americana (Townsend), C. balli sp.nov. (localité type : comté de Masham, Québec, Canada), C. elyii (Walton), C. flava sp.nov. (localité type : comté de Masham, Québec, Canada), C. oriens sp.nov. (localité type : comté de Masham, Québec, Canada) et C. occidentalis sp.nov. (localité type : Lakelse Lake, Colombie-Britannique, Canada). La répartition du groupe bicolor s’étend dans l’ancien monde et dans la région néarctique, le groupe flaviseta a une répartition européenne–néarctique et le groupe americana a une répartition néotropicale–néarctique. On trouvera ici une clé d’identification des adultes des neuf espèces néarctiques de Ceromya ainsi que leur description, la liste de leurs hôtes (avec corrections apportées aux mentions antérieures), des cartes de répartition ainsi que des illustrations des caractéristiques diagnostiques.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 126 , Issue 3 , June 1994 , pp. 775 - 806
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, S. 1983. Phylogeny and classification of Old World genera of Siphonini (Diptera: Tachinidae). Entomologica scandinavica 14: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.F., and Kaya, H.K.. 1974. Parasitism of the elm spanworm by Telenomus alsophilae and Actia ontario in Connecticut. pp. 267–276 in Beard, R.L. (Ed.), Connecticut Entomological Society 25th Anniversary Memoirs. Connecticut Entomological Society, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Arnaud, P.H. Jr., 1978. A Host–Parasite Catalog of North American Tachinidae (Diptera). United States Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication 1319: 860 pp.Google Scholar
Ball, G.E. 1992. The tribe Licinini (Coleoptera: Carabidae): A review of the genus-groups and of the species of selected genera. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 100: 325–380.Google Scholar
Bezzi, M. 1923. Fissicorn Tachinidae, with description of new forms from Australia and South America. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 48: 647–659.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1895. Notes and descriptions of Tachinidae. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 3: 49–58.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1897. Revision of the Tachinidae of America North of Mexico. A Family of Parasitic Two-winged Insects. United States Department of Agriculture, Division of Entomology, Technical Series 7: 156 pp.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1910. The type-species of the North American genera of Diptera. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 37: 499–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1927. Some new Australian and African Diptera of the families Muscidae and Tachinidae (Dipt.). Entomologische Mitteilungen 16: 345–357.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1930. Report on the Diptera collected at the Station for the Study of Insects, Harriman Interstate Park, N.Y. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 61: 21–115.Google Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1933. The North American Species of Actia in the American Museum of Natural History. American Museum Novitates 614: 7 pp.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1960. Biologie der westpalaarktischen Raupenfliegen. Dipt., Tachinidae. Monographien zur angewandte Entomologie 16: 188 pp.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1972. Die Typenexemplare der von Meigen (1824–1838) beschriebenen Raupenfliegen (Dipt. Tachinidae). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde 243: 15 pp.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1977. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der europäischen Raupenfliegen (Dipt. Tachinidae). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde (A) 295: 16 pp.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1984. Catalogue of Palearctic Tachinidae (Diptera). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde (A) 369: 228 pp.Google Scholar
Hodges, R.W., Dominick, T., Davis, D.R., Ferguson, D.C., Franclemont, J.G., Munroe, E.G., and Powell, J.A. (Eds.). 1983. Check List of the Lepidoptera of America North of Mexico including Greenland. E.W. Classey Ltd. and The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London. 284 pp.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.W. 1925. Fauna of New England. 15. List of the Diptera or Two-winged Flies. Occasional Papers of the Boston Society of Natural History 7: 326 pp.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1930. Diptera Calyptratae of the Federated Malay States. (Third paper.) Journal of the Federated Malay States Museums 16: 119–153.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W. 1824. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten 4: xii + 428 pp. Hamm.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L.P. 1963. 64g. Larvaevorinae (Tachininae). pp. 801–848in Lindner, E. (Ed.), Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region 8. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J.E. 1983. Classification, phylogeny and zoogeography of the North American species of Siphona Meigen (Diptera: Tachinidae). Quaestiones Entomologicae (1982) 18: 261–380.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J.E. 1988. Survey of first instars of the Siphonini (Diptera: Tachinidae). Entomologica scandinavica 18: 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, J.E. 1989. Systematics of the genus group taxa of the Siphonini (Diptera: Tachinidae). Quaestiones Entomologicae 25: 1–229.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J.E. 1991. Revision of Nearctic species of Actia Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Tachinidae). The Canadian Entomologist 123: 745–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raizenne, H. 1952. Forest Lepidoptera of Southern Ontario and their Parasites Received and Reared at the Ottawa Forest Insect Survey Laboratory from 1937 to 1948. Canada Department of Agriculture, Science Service, Division of Forest Biology, Ottawa. i–v, 277 pp.Google Scholar
Richter, V.A. 1980. Tachinids (Diptera, Tachinidae) of the Chita region. Nasekomye Mongolii 7: 518–552. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, J.B. 1830. Essai sur les Myodaires. Mémoires présentés par divers Savans à l'Académie Royale des Sciences de l'Institut de France. Sciences Mathématiques et Physiques 2: 813 pp.Google Scholar
Sabrosky, C.W., and Arnaud, P.H. Jr., 1965. Family Tachinidae (Larvaevoridae). pp. 961–1108 in Stone, A. et al. , (Eds.), A Catalog of the Diptera of America North of Mexico. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 276: 1696 pp.Google Scholar
Schaffner, J.V. Jr., and Griswold, C.L.. 1934. Macrolepidoptera and their Parasites reared from Field Collections in the Northeastern Part of the United States. United States Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication 188: 160 pp.Google Scholar
Shima, H. 1970. Notes on some Japanese Siphonini (Diptera: Tachinidae). Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University 16: 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, P. 1924. Die verbreitetsten Tachiniden Mitteleuropas nach ihren Gattungen und Arten. Archiv für Naturgeschichte (A) 90(6): 271 pp.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1892. Notes on North American Tachinidae, with descriptions of new genera and species. Paper V. The Canadian Entomologist 24: 64–70, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1919. New genera and species of muscoid flies. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 56: 541–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1926. New muscoid flies of the Oriental, Australian, and African faunas. Philippine Journal of Science 29: 529–544.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1927. Synopse dos generos muscoideos da região humida tropical da America, com generos e especies novas. Revista Museu Paulista 15(old series): 203–385.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1940. Manual of Myiology in Twelve Parts. Part X. Oestroid Generic Diagnoses and Data. Anacamptomyiini to Frontinini. São Paulo. 335 pp.Google Scholar
Walton, W.R. 1914. Four new species of Tachinidae from North America. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 16: 90–95.Google Scholar
Webber, R.T., and Schaffner, J.V.. 1926. Host Relations of Compsilura concinnata Meigen, an Important Tachinid Parasite of the Gypsy Moth and the Brown-tail Moth. United States Department of Agriculture, Department Bulletin 1363: 31 pp.Google Scholar
Wood, D.M. 1987. Chapter 110. Tachinidae. pp. 1193–1269 in McAlpine, J.F. et al. , (Eds.), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Volume 2. Agriculture Canada Monograph 28: i–vi, 675–1332.Google Scholar