Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:28:56.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION OF NEARCTIC SPECIES OF ACTIA ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY (DIPTERA: TACHINIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

James E. O’Hara
James E. O’Hara
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eight species of the siphonine genus Actia Robineau-Desvoidy are recognized in the Nearctic Region, including four that are new: A. dasymyia sp.nov. (type-locality 21 mi. east Tuktoyaktuk, North West Territories, Canada), A. dimorpha sp.nov. (type-locality Sapelo Island, Georgia, USA), A. radialis sp.nov. (type-locality Gatineau Park, Quebec, Canada), and A. sternalis sp.nov. (type-locality mi. 51 Dempster Highway, Yukon, Canada). Adults of the eight species are keyed, described, illustrated (heads, wings, and male terminalia), and their distributions mapped. The species are arranged into three species groups: the autumnalis-group with Nearctic members A. autumnalis (Townsend), A. rufescens (Greene), A. diffidens Curran, and A. dimorpha sp.nov.; the lamia-group with Nearctic members A. interrupta Curran, A. dasymyia sp.nov., and A. radialis sp.nov.; and the crassicornis-group with the single Nearctic member A. sternalis sp.nov. Nearctic Actia are inferred to be of relatively recent origin because only the A. autumnalis/A. rufescens species pair seems to have speciated within the Nearctic Region. Actia autumnalis/A. rufescens, A. diffidens, and A. dimorpha are each hypothesized to have their closest phylogenetic affinities with Neotropical species, and A. sternalis, A. interrupta, A. dasymyia, and questionably A. radialis are each hypothesized to have their closest affinities with Palearctic species.

Résumé

Huit espèces siphonines du genre Actia Robineau-Desvoidy sont reconnues de la région néarctique, y compris quatre espèces nouvelles : A. dasymyia sp.nov. (site-type 21 mi. à l’est de Tuktoyaktuk, Territoires-du-nord-ouest, Canada), A. dimorpha sp.nov. (site-type Sapelo Island, Georgia, USA), A. radialis sp.nov. (site-type Parc Gatineau, Québec, Canada), et A. sternalis sp.nov. (site-type 51e mille route Dempster, Yukon, Canada). Les individus adultes ont été clavetés, décrits, illustrés (têtes, ailles et terminaux mâles) et leurs dispersions ont été entrées sur une carte. Les espèces ont été rangées dans trois groupes d’espèces : le groupe autumnalis avec des membres néarctiques A. autumnalis (Townsend), A. rufescens (Greene), A. diffidens Curran et A. dimorpha sp.nov.; le groupe lamia avec des membres néarctiques A. interrupta Curran, A. dasymyia sp.nov. et A. radialis sp.nov.; et le groupe crassicornis avec le membre néarctique unique A. sternalis sp.nov. Il a été conclu que les Actia néarctiques sont d’origine relativement récente, parce que la paire-espèce A. autumnalis/A. rufescens seule semble d’être devenue une espèce en dedans de la région néarctique. Il est proposé que Actia autumnalis/A. rufescens, A. diffidens et A. dimorpha ont leurs affinités les plus proches avec les espèces néarctiques, et que A. sternalis, A. interrupta, A. dasymyia et peut-être A. radialis ont leurs affinités les plus proches avec les espèces paléarctiques.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 123 , Issue 4 , August 1991 , pp. 745 - 776
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, S. 1983. Phylogeny and classification of Old World genera of Siphonini (Diptera: Tachinidae). Ent. scand. 14: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud, P.H. Jr, 1978. A host–parasite catalog of North American Tachinidae (Diptera). U.S.D.A. Misc. Publ. 1319: 1–860.Google Scholar
Bezzi, M. 1926. A new tachinid (Dipt.) from Australia, with notes on the forms with obliterated fourth vein. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9) 17: 236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauer, F., and von Bergenstamm, J.E.. 1889. Die Zweiflügler des Kaiserlichen Museums zu Wien. IV. Vorarbeiten zu einer Monographie der Muscaria Schizometopa (exclusive Anthomyidae). Pars I. K. Akad. der Wiss. Wien, Math.-Nat. Cl. Denkschr. 56(1): 69–180, 11 pls. [Also published separately in Wien, 1889, 112 pp.]Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1897. Revision of the Tachinidae of America north of Mexico. A family of parasitic two-winged insects. Tech. Ser., U.S.D.A., Div. Ent. 7: 1–156.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1910. The type-species of the North American genera of Diptera. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 37: 499–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1933. The North American species of Actia in the American Museum of Natural History. Am. Mus. Novit. 614: 1–7.Google Scholar
Greene, C.T. 1921. An illustrated synopsis of the puparia of 100 muscoid flies (Diptera). Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 60(10): 1–39, 20 pls.Google Scholar
Greene, C.T. 1934. Tachinid flies with an evanescent fourth vein, including a new genus and five new species. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 36: 27–40.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1971. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der europäischen Raupenfliegen (Dipt. Tachinidae). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk. 237: 1–18.Google Scholar
Hodges, R.W., Dominick, T., Davis, D.R., Ferguson, D.C., Franclemont, J.G., Munroe, E.G., and Powell, J.A. (Eds.). 1983. Check List of the Lepidoptera of America North of Mexico including Greenland. E.W. Classey Ltd. and Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London. 284 pp.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1987. Opinion 1432. Actia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Insecta, Diptera): Roeselia lamia Meigen, 1838, designated as type species. Bull. zool. Nom. 44: 71–72.Google Scholar
Kamran, M.A. 1980. A systematic analysis of the genus Actia Robineau-Desvoidy in North America with descriptions of two new species (Diptera: Tachinidae). Jl. N.Y. ent. Soc. 88: 51–52. [Abstract of an oral paper presented at the 51st annual meeting of the Eastern Branch of the Entomological Society of America.]Google Scholar
Lioy, P. 1864. I ditteri distribuiti secondo un nuovo metodo di classificazione naturale [cont.]. I.R. 1st. Veneto di Sci., Let. ed Arti, Atti (3) 9: 499–518, 569–604, 719–771, 879–910, 989–1027, 1087–1126, 1311–1352 [cont.].Google Scholar
Macquart, J. 1834. Insectes Diptères du nord de la France. Athéricères: Créophiles, Oestrides, Myopaires, Conopsaires, Scénopiniens, Céphalopsides. Soc. Roy. des Sci., de l'Agr. et des Arts, Lille, Mém. 1833: 137–368, 6 pls.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W. 1824. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten 4, i–xii, 428 pp., pls. 33–41. Hamm.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W. 1838. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten 7, “oder Supplementband”, i–xii, 434 pp., pls. 64–74. Hamm.Google Scholar
Mumma, R.O., and Zettle, A.S.. 1977. Larval and pupal parasites of the oak leafroller, Archips semiferanus. Environ. Ent. 6: 601–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oatman, E.R., McMurtry, J.A., Waggonner, M., Platner, G.A., and Johnson, H.G.. 1983. Parasitization of Amorbia cuneana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and Sabulodes aegrotata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) on avocado in southern California. J. econ. Ent. 76: 52–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, J.E. 1983. Classification, phylogeny and zoogeography of the North American species of Siphona Meigen (Diptera: Tachinidae). Quaest. Ent. (1982) 18: 261–380.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J.E. 1985. Actia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Insecta: Diptera): Request for designation of type species. Z.N.(S.) 2491. Bull. zool. Nom. 42: 93–97.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J.E. 1988. Survey of first instars of the Siphonini (Diptera: Tachinidae). Ent. scand. 18: 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, J.E. 1989. Systematics of the genus group taxa of the Siphonini (Diptera: Tachinidae). Quaest. Ent. 25: 1–229.Google Scholar
Prebble, M.L. 1935. Actia diffidens Curran, a parasite of Peronea variana (Fernald) in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia. Can. J. Res. 12: 216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, J.B. 1830. Essai sur les Myodaires. Inst. de France, [Cl. des] Sci. Math. et Phys., Acad. Roy. des Sci., Mém. présentés par divers Savans (2) 2: 1–813. Paris.Google Scholar
Sabrosky, C.W., and Arnaud, P.H. Jr, 1965. Family Tachinidae (Larvaevoridae). pp. 961–1108 in Stone, A. et al. , (Eds.), A Catalog of the Diptera of America North of Mexico. U.S.D.A., Agric. Handbk. 276: 1–1696.Google Scholar
Shima, H. 1970. Notes on some Japanese Siphonini (Diptera: Tachinidae). J. Fac. Agric., Kyushu Univ. 16: 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, G.A., Leonard, D.E., and Chen, C.W.. 1975. Influence of tree species density and composition on parasitism of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.). Environ. Ent. 4: 832–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syme, P.D. 1971. Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.), European pine shoot moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). pp. 194–205in Simmonds, F.J. (Ed.), Biological Control Programmes against Insects and Weeds in Canada 1959–1968. Commonwealth Inst. Biol. Ctrl., Tech. Comm. No. 4. England.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1916. Diagnoses of new genera of muscoid flies founded on old species. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 49: 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1917. Miscellaneous muscoid notes and descriptions. Insecutor Inscit. Menstr. (1916) 4: 121–128.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1934. Five new genera of New Zealand and Malayan Oestroidae. Jl. N.Y. ent. Soc. 42: 247–248.Google Scholar
Townsend, C.H.T. 1940. Manual of myiology in twelve parts. Part X. Oestroid generic diagnoses and data. Anacampto-myiini to Frontinini. São Paulo. 335 pp.Google Scholar
Wood, D.M. 1987. Chapter 110. Tachinidae. pp. 1193–1269 in McAlpine, J.F. et al. , (Eds.), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Volume 2. Agric. Can. Monogr. 28: i–vi, 675–1332.Google Scholar