Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:58:22.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RESPONSE BEHAVIOUR OF SCOLYTID BEETLES AND ODOUR METEOROLOGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

John A. Chapman
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Department of Forestry and Rural Development, Victoria, British Columbia

Abstract

Transport and dispersal of odours by air currents is considered an important factor in scolytid response to attractant sources. This viewpoint provides explanations for some puzzling field observations and data, and helps identify significant questions about scolytid flight behaviour. There is a need for "odour meteorology", which would be concerned with the rates and types of odour distribution near the ground, and would provide a basis for the most effective use of chemical attractants in natural environments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. F. 1948. Host selection by the pine engraver. J. econ. Ent. 41: 596602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossert, W. H., and Wilson, E. O.. 1963. The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. J. theoret. Biol. 5: 443469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, C. G., and Fairey, E. M.. 1964. Pheromones of the honeybee: biological studies of the mandibular gland secretion of the queen. J. apic. Res. 3: 6576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1962. Field studies on attack flight and log selection by the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 94: 7492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1963. Attraction of the bark beetle, Dolurgus pumilus Mannerheim, to a barrel previously containing commercial BHC. Bi-mon. Prog. Rep. Div. Forest Biol., Ottawa, No. 19(1). pp. 34.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1966. The effect of attack by the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) on log attractiveness. Can. Ent. 98: 5059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chararas, C. 1962. Scolytides des Conifères. P. Lechevalier, Paris.Google Scholar
Daterman, G. E., Rudinsky, J. A., and Nagel, W. P.. 1965. Flight patterns of bark and timber beetles associated with coniferous forests of western Oregon. Stn tech. Bull. Ore. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 87.Google Scholar
Francke-Grosmann, H. 1963. Some new aspects in forest entomology. A. Rev. Ent. 8: 415438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gara, R. I., and Vité, J. P.. 1962. Studies on the flight patterns of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in second growth Ponderosa pine forests. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 21: 275289.Google Scholar
Gara, R. I., Vité, J. P.. and Cramer, H. H.. 1965. Manipulation of Dendroctonus frontalis by use of a population aggregating pheromone. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 23: 5566.Google Scholar
Gardiner, L. M. 1957. Collecting wood-boring beetle adults by turpentine and smoke. Bi-mon. Prog. Rep. Div. Forest Biol., Ottawa, No. 13(1). p. 2.Google Scholar
Geiger, R. 1965. The climate near the ground. 4th ed. Trans. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henson, W. R. 1962. Laboratory studies on the adult behavior of Conophthorus coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). III. Flight. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 55: 524530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, M. 1965. Insect sex attractants. Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. E., and Pettinger, L. F.. 1961. Douglas-fir beetle attacks in living trees as influenced by the presence of fresh windthrow. Weyerhaeuser Co. Forestry Research Note No. 37.Google Scholar
McMullen, L. H., and Atkins, M. D.. 1962. On the flight and host selection of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 94: 13091325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perttunen, V., and Boman, T.. 1965. Laboratory experiments on the spontaneous take-off activity of Blastophagus piniperda (Col., Scolytidae) in relation to temperature and light intensity at different seasons of the year. Proc. XIIth Int. Congr. Ent. (London). Vol. 5. pp. 344345.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. 1963. Response of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins to volatile attractants. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 2338.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. 1966 a. Host selection and invasion by the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, in coastal Douglas-fir forests. Can. Ent. 98: 98111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. 1966 b. Scolytid beetles associated with Douglas-fir: response to terpenes. Science 152: 218219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudinsky, J. A., and Daterman, G. E.. 1964. Field studies on flight patterns and olfactory responses of ambrosia beetles in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon. Can. Ent. 96: 13391352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, R. M., Rodin, J. O., and Wood, D. L.. 1966. Sex attractants in frass produced by male Ips confusus in Ponderosa pine. Science 154: 509510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vité, J. P. 1965. Die Wirkung pflanzen- und insekteneigener Lockstoffe auf Pityophthorus und Pityogenes (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Naturwissenschaften 52: 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Gara, R. I.. 1961. A field method for observation on olfactory responses of bark beetles (Scolytidae) to volatile materials. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 21: 175182.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Gara, R. I.. 1962. Volatile attractants from Ponderosa pine attacked by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 21: 251273.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., Gara, R. I., and von Scheller, H. D.. 1964. Field observations on the response to attractants of bark beetles infesting southern pines. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 461470.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L., and Vité, J. P.. 1961. Studies on the host selection behavior of Ips confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking Pinus ponderosa. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 21: 7995.Google Scholar
Wright, R. H. 1958. The olfactory guidance of flying insects. Can. Ent. 90: 8189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, R. H. 1964 a. The science of smell. G. Allen and Unwin Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Wright, R. H. 1964 b. After pesticides–what? Nature 204: 121125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed