Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:40:07.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predatory Behavior of Philodromus rufus Walckenaer (Araneae: Thomisidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Dean L. Haynes  and
P. Sisojević
Dean L. Haynes
Affiliation:
Forest Entomology and Pathology Laboratory, Fredericton, New Brunswick
P. Sisojević
Affiliation:
Forest Entomology and Pathology Laboratory, Fredericton, New Brunswick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Factors which influence the rate at which Philodromus rufus Walckenaer attacks prey are discussed. Drosophila melanogaster Meign. was used as prey throughout the rearing and testing of P. rufus. Spiders used in these tests were immature at the time of capture and reared to the adult stage in the laboratory. Feeding histories were maintained for all spiders, although the experiments designed to measure the attack response of individual spiders to changing prey density were done with adult males.

In the immature stage there was no difference between the feeding rate of male and female spiders. The adult males, however, were relatively inefficient predators; females killed approximately six times as many flies in their adult lives as males. The irregular feeding pattern of the females, as compared to the fairly uniform feeding pattern of the males, resulted in the males being more amenable to experimental tests. Periods of starvation, molting, and opposition strongly influenced the feeding rate of P. rufus. At high prey densities there was an inverse relationship between hunger and utilization of individual prey. This resulted from uncaptured prey interfering with the feeding spider.

Both feeding time and searching time showed a relationship to prey density. Individual fly activity increased with fly density and this resulted in a functional response curve with an increasing slope. One of the basic requirements for regulation was thereby demonstrated. When prey density was corrected for the increase in fly activity by computing a new density estimate based on fly activity, a typical functional response for invertebrates became evident for hungry spiders but not for well-fed spiders. By using Holling's “disc equation” the difference between starved and satiated spiders was explained as an interaction between prey and predator characteristics. Owing to density-dependent parameters such as prey activity, predator feeding time, and “rate of discovery”, no known mathematical model fitted the data.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 98 , Issue 2 , February 1966 , pp. 113 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dondale, C. D. 1961. Life histories of some common spiders from trees and shrubs in Nova Scotia. Canad. J. Zool. 39: 777–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dondale, C. D. 1964. Sexual behavior and its application to a species problem in the spider genus Philodromus (Araneae: Thomisidae). Canad. J. Zool. 42: 817–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1959a. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Canad. Ent. 91: 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1959b. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Canad. Ent. 91: 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1961. Principles of insect predation. Annu. Rev. Ent. 6: 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1963. An experimental component analysis of population processes, pp. 22–32. In LeRoux, E. J. (ed.), Population dynamics of agricultural and forest insect pests. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 32.Google Scholar
Loughton, B. G., Derry, C. and West, A. S.. 1963. Spiders and the spruce budworm, pp. 249–268. In Morris, R. F. (ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1963a. Predation and the spruce budworm, pp. 244–248. In Morris, R. F. (ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1963b. The effect of predatory age and prey defense on the functional response of Podisus maculiventris Say to the density of Hyphantria cunea Drury. Canad. Ent. 95: 1009–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, A. L. 1960. The prey of the spider Linyphia triangularis (Clerck), (Araneae, Linyphiidae). Canad. J. Zool. 38: 859–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, A. L. 1964. The search for prey by a web-building spider Achaearanea tepidariorum (C. L. Koch) (Araneae, Theridiidae). Canad. Ent. 96: 568–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, K. E. F. 1963. The analysis of the survival of large larvae in the unsprayed area, pp. 52–63. In. Morris, R. F. (ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31.Google Scholar