Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:00:26.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE "PHENOLOGICAL DATE" AS AN INDICATOR OF THE FLIGHT PERIOD OF NOCTUID MOTHS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. F. Hardwick
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa

Abstract

Climatic factors which may control the time of occurrence of seasonal phenomena are discussed, and in particular the role of temperature in initiating periodic cycles in animals in continental North America. The seasonal flight periods of nine species of noctuid moths at two localities in western North America are considered in terms of the lengths of the summer season at these localities. Among the species discussed, those that are in flight prior to midsummer fly earlier, and those that are in flight after midsummer fly later, in the area with a long summer than in the area with a short summer. A factor termed the "phenological date," which is based on the number of days above 42°F in a given area, is proposed as a measure of seasonal development. The factors of photoperiod and temperature that may have a controlling influence on periodic events are discussed. Variance analysis suggests that the phenological date has greater predictive value in estimating the periods of flight of the species considered than have the other factors.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Danilevskii, A. S. 1965. Photoperiodism and seasonal development of insects. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London. [As translated from the Russian edition of 1961 by J. Johnston.]Google Scholar
Eckert, W. J. and Clemence, G. M. (compilers). 1945. Tables of sunrise, sunset, and twilight. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. F. 1966. Applied climatology. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
Hardwick, D. F. and Lefkovitch, L. P.. 1971. Physical and biotic factors affecting Euxoa species abundance in western North America: a regression analysis. Can. Ent. 103: 12171235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, A. D. 1918. Periodic events and natural law as guides to agricultural research and practice. Mon. Weath. Rev. U.S. Dep. Agric. Suppl. 9, pp. 142.Google Scholar
Merriam, C. H. 1898. Life zones and crop zones of the United States. Bull. Bur. biol. Surv. U.S. Dep. Agric. 10, pp. 179.Google Scholar
Sears, T. A. 1970. A possible explanation for seasonal emergence peaks of Macrolepidoptera in southern Chihuahua. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 46: 8283.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. A. 1967. Growing season as affected by land aspect and soil texture. In Weather and agriculture, ed by Taylor, J. A.. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wang, J.-Y. 1963. Agricultural meteorology. Pacemaker Press, Madison, Wisc.693 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. 1939. An analysis of four years captures of insects in a light trap. I: General survey; sex proportion; phenology; and time of flight. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 89: 79132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltshire, E. P. 1938. Notes on the winter flight, in mild climates, of vernal and autumnal moths. Entomologist's Rec. J. Var. 50: 144146.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, E. P. 1941 a. The summer flight, in cold climates, of vernal and autumnal Lepidoptera. Entomologist's Rec. J. Var. 53: 47.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, E. P. 1941 b. The phenological classification of Palaearctic Lepidoptera. A preliminary essay. Entomologist's Rec. J. Var. 53: 101106.Google Scholar