Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:57:09.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NOTES ON MATING BEHAVIOR AND OVIPOSITION OF CHRYSOCHARIS LARICINELLAE (HYMENOPTERA: EULOPHIDAE), A PARASITE OF THE LARCH CASEBEARER (COLEOPHORA LARICELLA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

F. W. Quednau
F. W. Quednau
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Department of Forestry and Rural Development, Quebec, Quebec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chrysocharis laricinellae (Ratz.) mated readily in the laboratory when several individuals of both sexes were held together in a vial. The courtship dance performed by the male is described. Parasite females develop mature eggs 3 days after emergence and are apparently capable of resorbing the eggs if hosts are not available, and to produce new ones after host-feeding. Storage of eggs in the ovary for 5 months at 55°F and sterility (phasic castration) of certain individuals is reported. Longevity of egg-laying females at 75°F was about 1 month less than that of parasites that had been denied contact with hosts. Odor apparently plays little or no role in the location of the larch casebearer larvae by C. laricinellae, but chemical surface stimuli seem to exist on the surface of a mine or case of Coleophora laricella (Hbn.). The parasite is also stimulated by vibrations of the host in its case. The oviposition and host-feeding pattern of C. laricinellae is described. Host-feeding on fourth-instar larvae of the larch casebearer contributed little to host mortality.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 99 , Issue 3 , March 1967 , pp. 326 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baier, M. 1964. Zur Biologie and Gradologie des Sattelmücke Haplodiplosis equestris Wagener (Diptera, Cecidomyidae). E. angew. Ent. 53: 217–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, T. 1962. An effect of parasite attack on host mortality, as exemplified by Encarsia formosa and Trialeurodes vaporariorum. Can. Ent. 94: 673–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bach, P., and Landi, J.. 1961. The introduced purple scale parasite, Aphytis lepidosaphes Compere, and a method of integrating chemical with biological control. Hilgardia 31: 459–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowden, P. B. 1941. Parasites of the birch leaf-mining sawfly (Phyllotoma nemorata). U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 757.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. L. 1954. The host-finding and oviposition behaviour of Mormoniella vitripennis (Walker) (Hym., Pteromalidae), a parasite of muscoid flies. Behaviour 7: 88–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1935. An apparent correlation between the feeding habits of certain Pteromalids and the condition of their ovarian follicles. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 28: 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1942. Oosorption and ovulation in relation to oviposition in the parasitic hymenoptera. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 35: 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, J. 1937. Host-finding by insect parasites. I. Observations on the finding of hosts by Alysia manducator, Mormoniella vitripennis and Trichogramma evanescens. J. Anim. Ecol. 6: 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchal, P. 1936. Les Trichogrammes. ann. Epiphyt. Phytogèn. N.S. 2, 4, 447–550.Google Scholar
Quednau, F. W., and Hübsch, H. M.. 1964. Factors influencing the host-finding and host-acceptance pattern in some Aphytis species (Hym. Aphelinidae). S. Afr. J. agric. Sci. 7: 543–554.Google Scholar
Salt, G. 1938. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. VI. Host suitability. Bull. ent. Res. 29: 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, F. J. 1953. Observations on the biology and mass-breeding of Spalangia drosophilae Ashm. (Hym. Spalangiidae), a parasite of the fritfly, Oscinella frit (L.). Bull. ent. Res. 44: 773–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stüben, M. 1949. Zur Biologie der Chalcidie Encarsia tricolor. Biol. Zbl. 8: 413–429.Google Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1958. Factors that affect host finding by Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Can. Ent. 90: 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar