Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:31:04.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NEW NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES IN THE GENERA NEOTHREMMA AND FARULA, WITH HYPOTHESES ON PHYLOGENY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY (TRICHOPTERA: UENOIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Glenn B. Wiggins  and
Robert W. Wisseman
Glenn B. Wiggins
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C6 andDepartment of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A1
Robert W. Wisseman
Affiliation:
3490 NW Deer Run Road, Cowallis, Oregon, USA97330
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three new species are described in the caddisfly family Uenoidae: Neothremma prolata, from Hood River County, Oregon; Neothremma mucronata from Lassen County, California; and Farula constricta from Multnomah County, Oregon. Following examination of the holotypes of several species, misinterpretation of the male genitalia morphology of Farula wigginsi Denning is corrected, leading to the recognition of that name as a junior synonym of F. petersoni Denning. Interpretation of male genitalic morphology in the original description of F. geyseri Denning is revised. Phylogenetic relationships are inferred from male genitalic morphology for the species of Neothremma and Farula. Biogeographic patterns of the species in both genera are highly congruent with the phylogenies.

Résumé

On trouvera ici la description de trois nouvelles espèces de Trichoptères de la famille des Uenoidae : Neothremma prolata, du comté Hood River, Oregon, Neothremma mucronata, du comté Lassen, Californie, et Farula constricta, du comté Multnomah, Oregon. L’examen des holotypes de plusieurs espèces a permis de corriger l’interprétation erronée de la morphologie des organes génitaux mâles de Farula wigginsi Denning et cette espèce est déclarée synonyme récent de F. petersoni Denning. L’interprétation de la morphologie des organes génitaux mâles dans la description originale d’E. geyseri Denning est réexaminée. La morphologie des pièces génitales mâles des espèces de Neothremma et de Farula permet de poser des hypothèses quant à leurs relations phylogénétiques. Les répartitions géographiques respectives des différentes espèces des deux genres correspondent tout à fait aux phylogénies.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 124 , Issue 6 , December 1992 , pp. 1063 - 1074
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Denning, D.G. 1958. The genus Farula (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 51: 531–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denning, D.G. 1966. New and interesting Trichoptera. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 42: 228–238.Google Scholar
Denning, D.G. 1973. New Species of Trichoptera. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 49: 132–143.Google Scholar
Denning, D.G. 1975. New species of Trichoptera from western North America. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 51: 318–326.Google Scholar
Denning, D.G. 1983. New and interesting Trichoptera from the western United States. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 58: 206–215 (1982).Google Scholar
Denning, D.G. 1989. Eight New Species of Trichoptera. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 65(2): 123–131.Google Scholar
Ross, H.H. 1949. The caddisfly genus Neothremma Banks (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 39: 92–93.Google Scholar
Schmid, F. 1955. Contribution à l'étude des Limnophilidae (Trichoptera). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 28: 245 pp.Google Scholar
Schmid, F. 1968. Quelques Trichoptères Néarctiques nouveaux ou peu connus. Naturaliste Canadien 95: 673–698.Google Scholar
Schmid, F. 1980. Genera des Trichoptères du Canada et des États Unis adjacents. Les Insectes et Arachnides du Canada. Partie 7. Agriculture Canada Publication 1692: 296 pp.Google Scholar
Vineyard, R.N., and Wiggins, G.B.. 1988. Further revision of the caddisfly family Uenoidae (Trichoptera): Evidence for inclusion of Neophylacinae and Thremmatidae. Systematic Entomology 13: 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vineyard, R.N., and Wiggins, G.B.. 1993. Systematics of the caddisfly genus Neophylax (Trichoptera: Uenoidae). ROM Life Sciences Contributions. In press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G.B., and Erman, N.A.. 1987. Additions to the systematics and biology of the caddisfly family Uenoidae (Trichoptera). The Canadian Entomologist 119: 867–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, G.B., Weaver, J.S. III, and Unzicker, J.D.. 1985. Revision of the caddisfly family Uenoidae (Trichoptera). The Canadian Entomologist 117: 763–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar