Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:37:54.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE NEARCTIC SPECIES OF DUTA NIXON (HYMENOPTERA: SCELIONIDAE), EGG PARASITOIDS OF GROUND CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Lubomir Masner
Lubomir Masner
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Nearctic species of the genus Duta are revised. Two new species are described: D. foveolata (Canada, USA) and D. policeps (Canada, USA). Duta virginiensis (Ashmead), new combination, is shown to be widely distributed in the Western Hemisphere, extending to the New World tropics. A diagnosis of Duta and a key to the Nearctic species are given. The impact of environmental degradation on the frequency of Duta species in North America is discussed.

Résumé

Les espèces néarctiques du genre Duta ont fait l’objet d’une révision. Deux nouvelles espèces sont décrites : D. foveolata (Canada, É.-U.) et D. policeps (Canada, É.-U.). Duta virginiensis (Ashmead), nouvelle combinaison, s’est avéré très répandu dans l’hémisphère occidental et atteint même les tropiques du Nouveau Monde. On trouvera ici la diagnose de Duta ainsi qu’une clé d’identification des espèces néarctiques. L’impact de la dégradation de l’environnement sur la fréquence des espèces de Duta en Amérique du Nord est évalué.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 123 , Issue 4 , August 1991 , pp. 777 - 793
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmead, W.H. 1893. A monograph of the North American Proctotrypidae. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 45. 472 pp.Google Scholar
Dodd, A.P. 1920. Notes on the exotic Proctotrupoidea in the British and Oxford University Museums, with descriptions of new genera and species. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1919: 321–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, I.D. 1976. The types of Australian species of the subfamily Scelioninae (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Q. J. Agric. Anim. Sci. 33(1): 83–114.Google Scholar
Galloway, I.D., and Austin, A.D.. 1984. Revision of the Scelioninae (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) in Australia. Aust. J. Zool., Suppl. 99. 138 pp.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1926. Scelionidae. Das Tierreich 48: 885 pp.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M.A. 1970. Supergeneric groupings of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera). Rev. Ent. USSR 49: 203–226. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1976. Revisionary notes and keys to world genera of Scelionidae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 97. 87 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L., and Muesebeck, C.F.W.. 1968. The types of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) in the United States National Museum. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 270. 143 pp.Google Scholar
Mineo, G. 1979. Studies on the Scelionidae (Hym., Proctotrupoidea). IX. Material for a revision of the genus Gryon Hal., with description of 4 new species (G. austrafricanum, G. eremiogryon, G. laraichii, G. nicolai) and notes on other Scelionids. Boll. Lab. Ent. Agr. Portici 36: 234–265.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1958. In Krombein, K.V. Superfamily Proctotrupoidea, in Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. First Supplement. U.S. Gvt. Printing Office, Washington, DC. 1958. pp. 88–94.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1979. In Krombein, K.V. et al. , Superfamily Proctotrupoidea, in Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, DC. 1979. pp. 1121–1186.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., and Masner, L.. 1967. In Krombein, K.V., and Burks, B.D.. Superfamily Proctotrupoidea, in Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog Second Supplement. USDA Agric. Monogr. 2: 285–305.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., and Walkley, L.M.. 1951. In Muesebeck, et al. Superfamily Proctotrupoidea, in Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. U.S.D.A. Agric. Monogr. 2: 655–718.Google Scholar
Nixon, G.E.J. 1933. A further contribution to the study of South African Scelionidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 10, 12: 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priesner, H. 1951. New genera and species of Scelionidae (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea) from Egypt. Bull. Inst. Fouad ler Désert 1: 119–149, 15 figs.Google Scholar
Severin, H.C. 1935. The common black field cricket a serious pest in South Dakota. Bull. S. Dak. Agric. Exp. Sta. 295. 51 pp.Google Scholar
Szabó, J.B. 1957. Description of a new genus and some new species of the family Scelionidae from Hungary (Hym., Proctotrupoidea). Folia ent. hung. 10(13): 289–300.Google Scholar
Szabó, J.B. 1966. New proctotrupoid genera and species from the Neogaea (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). First report on South American Scelionidae and Platygasteridae. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 12(1–2): 161–179.Google Scholar