Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:19:20.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LABORATORY REARING OF THE WESTERN CHERRY FRUIT FLY, RHAGOLETIS INDIFFERENS (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE): OVIPOSITION AND LARVAL DIETS1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. T. AliNiazee  and
R. D. Brown
M. T. AliNiazee
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331
R. D. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a laboratory study, larvae of the western cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis indifferens Curran, were successfully reared on an artificial diet consisting of wood pulp, agar, wheat germ, Brewer’s yeast, sugar, salt, choline chloride, ascorbic, citric and propionic acids, cholesterol, methyl para-hydroxybenzoate (MPH), and water. Ten other diets consisting of various ingredients obtained variable results. A premixed tropical fruit fly diet (prepared by Nutritional Biochemicals, Cleveland, Ohio) was not suitable for rearing the cherry maggots. Formaldehyde was not satisfactory as a mold inhibitor.

The eggs were obtained on artificial cherries made up of a soft ceresin wax. No oviposition occurred on the other materials tested (candle wax, a regular ceresin wax, beeswax, and silicone). Significantly (5% level) more eggs were deposited on wax cherries of orange, green, and greenish-yellow colors than black, red, white and blue. A laboratory rearing method employing orange colored wax cherries and an artificial larval diet was established for culturing the western cherry fruit flies.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 9 , September 1977 , pp. 1227 - 1234
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AliNiazee, M. T. 1973. Biology and control of the western cherry fruit fly in Oregon. Proc. Oreg. hort. Soc. 64: 75–78.Google Scholar
Boller, E. F. 1966. Der Einfluss Natürlicher Reduktionsfaktoren auf die Kirschenfliege, Rhagoletis cerasi L. in der Nordwestschweiz, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Puppenstadiums. Schweiz. Landwirtsch. Forsch, 5: 153–210.Google Scholar
Boller, E. F. 1968. An artificial oviposition device for the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi. J. econ. Ent. 61: 850–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boller, E. F. and Prokopy, R. J.. 1976. Bionomics and management of Rhagoletis. A. Rev. Ent. 21: 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, R. W. and Chapman, P. J.. 1973. Bionomics of the apple maggot in eastern New York. Search (Agric. Ent., Geneva) 3. 62 pp.Google Scholar
Frick, K. E., Simkover, H. G., and Telford, H. J.. 1954. Bionomics of the cherry fruit flies in eastern Washington. Tech. Bull. Wash. agric. Exp. Stn 3. 66 pp.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S. and Tassan, R. L.. 1972. Exploring nutritional roles of extracellular symbiotes on the reproduction of honeydew feeding adult chrysopids and tephritids, pp. 323–351. In Rodriguez, J. G. (Ed.), Insect and mite nutrition. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S., Santas, L., and Tsecouras, A.. 1963. A technique of culturing the olive fly, Dacus oleae Gmel., on synthetic media under zenic conditions, pp. 333–356. In Radiation and radioisotopes applied to insects of agricultural importance. Proc. Symp. int. Atom. Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Haisch, A. and Boller, E. F.. 1971. Genetic control of the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi L. Progress report on rearing and sterilization, pp 67–76. In Sterility principle for insect control or eradication. Int. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Neilson, W. T. A. 1969. Rearing larvae of the apple maggot on an artificial medium. J. econ. Ent. 62: 1028–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, W. T. A. 1973. Improved method for rearing apple maggot larvae on artificial media. J. econ. Ent. 66: 555–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, W. T. A. and McAllan, J. W.. 1964. Artificial diets for the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella. I. Mass rearing on certain diets. J. econ. Ent. 57: 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. 1966. Artificial oviposition devices for apple maggot. J. econ. Ent. 59: 231–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. and Boller, E. F.. 1970. Artificial egging system for the European cherry fruit fly. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1413–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, L. F. and Mitchell, S.. 1966. Tephritid fruit flies, pp. 555–583. In Smith, C. N. (Ed.), Insect colonization and mass production. Academic Press, New York. 618 pp.Google Scholar