Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:55:57.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interspecific variation in life history traits of Elasmostethus (Hemiptera: Acanthosomatidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

S. Kudo ,
Aki Yamamoto ,
Tadao Ichita  and
Haruki Tatsuta
S. Kudo*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Naruto University of Education, Naruto, Tokushima 772-8502, Japan
Aki Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Otaru Museum, Otaru, Hokkaido 047-0031, Japan
Tadao Ichita
Affiliation:
Aomori Prefecutural Plant Protection Office, Dainitonya-machi, Aomori 030-0113, Japan
Haruki Tatsuta
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Life history traits, such as clutch size, egg size (weight), developmental periods of eggs, and female body (abdomen) size, were investigated in Japanese species of the genus Elasmostethus Fieber (Hemiptera: Acanthosomatidae): E. amabilis Yamamoto, E. brevis Lindberg, E. humeralis Jakovlev, E. interstinctus (Linnaeus), E. kerzhneri Yamamoto, and E. nubilus (Dallas). With the exception of clutch size, significant differences were observed in the traits among species. No species exhibited maternal care of eggs. These data form a solid basis for future comparative analyses in the family Acanthosomatidae, which contains both subsocial and asocial species.

Type
Behaviour & Ecology—Note
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 151 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 69 - 72
Copyright
© 2018 Entomological Society of Canada 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Amanda Roe

References

Carter, M.E. and Hoebeke, E.R. 2003. Biology and seasonal history of Elasmostethus atricornis (Van Duzee) (Hemiptera: Acanthosomatidae), with descriptions of the immature stages and notes on pendergrast organs. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 105: 525–534.Google Scholar
Costa, J.T. 2006. The other insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.Google Scholar
Fox, C.W. and Czesak, M.E. 2000. Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 45: 341–369.Google Scholar
Grazia, J., Schuh, R.T., and Wheeler, W.C. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships of family groups in Pentatomoidea based on morphology and DNA sequences (Insecta: Heteroptera). Cladistics, 24: 932–976.Google Scholar
Kaitala, A. and Mappes, J. 1997. Parental care and reproductive investment in shield bugs (Acanthosomatidae, Heteroptera). Oikos, 80: 3–7.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. and Tachikawa, S. 2004. Eggs and nymphs of the Japanese Pentatomoidea: morphology and ecology. Yokendo, Tokyo, Japan. [In Japanese].Google Scholar
Kudo, S. 2001. Intraclutch egg-size variation in acanthosomatid bugs: adaptive allocation of maternal investment? Oikos, 92: 208–214.Google Scholar
Mappes, J., Kaitala, A., and Rinne, V. 1996. Temporal variation in reproductive allocation in a shield bug Elasmostethus interstinctus . Journal of Zoology, 240: 29–35.Google Scholar
Price, P.W., Bouton, C.E., Gross, P., McPheron, B.A., Thompson, J.N., and Weis, A.E. 1980. Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11: 41–65.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 2016. JMP13 basic analysis. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Shine, R. 1978. Propagule size and parental care: the “safe harbor” hypothesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 75: 417–424.Google Scholar
Tachikawa, S. 1991. Studies on subsocialities of Heteroptera in Japan. Tokyo Agricultural University Press, Tokyo, Japan. [In Japanese, with English summary].Google Scholar
Tsai, J.-F., Kudo, S., and Yoshizawa, K. 2015. Maternal care in Acanthosomatinae (Insecta: Heteroptera: Acanthosomatidae) – correlated evolution with morphological change. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 15: 258, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0537-4.Google Scholar
Tsai, J.-F. and Rédei, D. 2015. Redefinition of Acanthosoma and taxonomic corrections to its included species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Acanthosomatidae). Zootaxa, 3950: 1–60.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1975. Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.Google Scholar
Wong, J.W., Meunier, J., and Kölliker, M. 2013. The evolution of parental care in insects: the roles of ecology, life history and the social environment. Ecological Entomology, 38: 123–137.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, A. 2003. A revision of Japanese Elasmostethus Fieber (Heteroptera: Acanthosomatidae). Tijdschrift voor entomologie, 146: 49–66.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, A., Hayashi, M., and Kudo, S. 2009. Host plants of Japanese acanthosomatid bugs (Heteroptera: Acanthosomatidae). Japanese Journal of Entomology (New Series), 12: 31–38. [In Japanese, with English abstract].Google Scholar