Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:13:48.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host range, attack dynamics, and impact of Cryptorhynchus lapathi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Salix (Salicaceae) spp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Cynthia L. Broberg ,
John H. Borden  and
Leland M. Humble
Cynthia L. Broberg*
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
John H. Borden
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Leland M. Humble
Affiliation:
Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 506 West Burnside Road, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8Z 1M5
*
1 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The poplar and willow borer, Cryptorhynchus lapathi (L.), known to be present in British Columbia since 1923, primarily attacks species of Salix L. (Salicaceae) and Populus L. (Salicaceae). Larvae bore into stems, causing them to break easily. The impact of the weevil has been rising in recent years because of the increasing importance of poplar and willow from both economic and ecological perspectives. We conducted a study at 45 locations in British Columbia to determine host use among native Salix spp. and the between- and within-tree dynamics of C. lapathi. There were 11 new host records, but the incidence of attack was similar among species. Attacked trees were larger in general and had more dead wood and stems, more adventitious branches per stem, more total breaks per stem, and more naturally caused breaks per stem than their attack-free neighbours. Breaks caused by C. lapathi tended to be slightly larger in diameter and lower on the stem than naturally caused breaks. Bases of stems were preferentially attacked, and C. lapathi selected large stems in which to oviposit. As large attack-free trees become less abundant, weevils apparently start to attack small-diameter stems. Although C. lapathi is adversely affecting the health of willows in British Columbia, there is no evidence that any Salix species is threatened by weevil-caused extinction.

Résumé

Le Charançon du saule, Cryptorhynchus lapathi (L.), dont la présence en Colombie-Britannique est connue depuis 1923, s’attaque surtout aux espèces de Salix L. (Salicaceae) et de Populus L. (Salicaceae). Les larves creusent des tunnels dans les tiges, ce qui les rend friables. L’impact de ce charançon a augmenté graduellement au cours de ces dernières années à cause de l’importance économique et écologique accrue des peupliers et des saules. Nous avons procédé à l’étude de 45 sites en Colombie-Britannique dan le but de déterminer l’utilisation des hôtes parmi les espèces indigènes de Salix et de comparer la dynamique de C. lapathi d’un arbre à l’autre et d’une partie à l’autre d’un même arbre. Nous avons reconnu 11 nouveaux hôtes, mais la fréquence des attaques s’est avérée semblable d’une espèce à l’autre. Les arbres attaqués sont généralement plus gros, comportent plus de bois mort et de tiges mortes, plus de branches adventices par tige, plus de fractures totales par tige et plus de fractures naturelles par tige que les arbres non attaqués. Les fractures attribuables à la présence de C. lapathi ont tendance à être de diamètre légèrement plus grand et sont placées plus bas sur la tige que les fractures naturelles. La base des tiges est la partie la plus attaquée et les femelles de C. lapathi choisissent des tiges d’une bonne taille pour pondre leurs oeufs. À mesure que les gros arbres non attaqués disparaissent, les charançons se mettent à attaquer des tiges de petit diamètre. En Colombie-Britannique, C. lapathi affecte la santé des saules, mais rien ne permet de croire que des espèces de Salix soient menacées d’extinction par la présence du charançon.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 133 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 119 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abebe, G., Hart, J.H. 1990. The relationship of site factors to the incidence of Cytospora and Septoria cankers and poplar and willow borer in hybrid poplar plantations. pp 163–71 in Adams, R.D. (Ed), Proceedings, Aspen Symposium, Duluth, Minnesota, 25–27 July 1989. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report NC–140Google Scholar
Broberg, C.L. 1999. Distribution and impact of Cryptorhynchus lapathi (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Salix spp. in British Columbia. Master of Pest Management thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
Brown, K.S. 1999. Bright future- or brief flare- for renewable energy? Science (Washington, DC) 285: 678–80Google Scholar
Callan, B.E. 1998. Diseases of Populus in British Columbia: a diagnostic manual. Victoria: Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
Carlson, M., Berger, V. 1998. Solid wood product opportunities from short rotation hybrid poplar trees. Forest Renewal BC Research Award No. TO97203-RE Final Report, BC Ministry of Forests, Kalamalka Forestry Centre, Vernon, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
Culshaw, D., Stokes, B. 1995. Mechanisation of short rotation forestry. Biomass and Bioenergy 9: 127–40Google Scholar
Dafauce, C. 1976. Susceptibilidad de clones de chopo al ataque de Cryptorrhynchus lapathi L. (Col. Curculionidae). Boletin de la Estacion Central de Ecologia 5: 39–66Google Scholar
Daniel, W.W. 1995. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 6th ed. Toronto: WileyGoogle Scholar
Feeny, P. 1976. Plant apparency and chemical defense. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 10: 1–40Google Scholar
Fraser, S.M., Lawton, J.H. 1994. Host range expansion by British moths onto introduced conifers. Ecological Entomology 19: 127–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froiland, S.G. 1962. The genus Salix (willows) in the Black Hills of South Dakota. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Technical Bulletin 1269Google Scholar
Harris, J.W.E., Coppel, H.C. 1967. The poplar-and-willow borer, Sternochetus (= Cryptorhynchus) lapathi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in British Columbia. The Canadian Entomologist 99: 411–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland, Volume 2 (Thesaurus). 2nd ed. Portland: Timber PressGoogle Scholar
Křístek, J. 1989. Die populationsdynamik der forstschadinsekten als grundlage des integrierten forstchutzes gegen sie. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Facultas Silviculturae (Brno), Series C 58: 47–83Google Scholar
Maclauchlan, L.E., Borden, J.H. 1996. Spatial dynamics and impacts of Pissodes terminalis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in regenerating stands of lodgepole pine. Forest Ecology and Management 82: 103–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCambridge, W.F., Knight, F.B. 1972. Factors affecting spruce beetles during a small outbreak. Ecology 53: 830–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primm, J.K. 1918. The European poplar canker in the vicinity of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Journal of Economic Entomology 11: 129–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safranyik, L. 1963. Analysis of some factors influencing the distribution and abundance of the poplar and willow borer (Sternochetus lapathi (L.)) on Scouler willow (Salix scouleriana Barratt). MFor thesis, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
Smith, B.D., Stott, K.G. 1964. The life history and behaviour of the willow weevil Cryptorrhynchus lapathi L. Annals of Applied Biology 54: 141–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalay-Marzsó, V.L. 1962. Zur morphologie, biologie und Bekämpfung des Erlenwürgers Cryptorrhynchus lapathi L. (Col. Curcul.) in Ungarn. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 49: 163–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J.A. 1999. A realizable renewable energy future. Science (Washington, DC) 285: 687–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanderSar, T.J.D., Borden, J.H. 1977. Visual orientation of Pissodes strobi Peck (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in relation to host selection behaviour. Canadian Journal of Zoology 55: 2042–9Google Scholar
Woods, R.F., Moore, L.M., Wilson, L.F., Ostry, M.E., Dickmann, D.I. 1982. Performance of 3-year old hybrid poplar clones in relation to soil texture, natural soil drainage and pest incidence. pp 74–83in Zavitkovski, J., Hansen, E.A. (Eds), Proceedings of the North American Poplar Council 19th Annual Meeting, Rhinelander, Wisconsin, 20–22 July 1982. Manhattan: Kansas State UniversityGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, IncGoogle Scholar
Ziller, W.G. 1974. The tree rusts of western Canada. Canadian Forestry Service Publication 1329Google Scholar