Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:22:32.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE FLIGHT RANGE OF CULICOIDES VARIIPENNIS (DIPTERA: CERATOPOGONIDAE)123

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Thomas H. Lillie ,
William C. Marquardt  and
Robert H. Jones
Thomas H. Lillie
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Entomology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523
William C. Marquardt
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Entomology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523
Robert H. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Entomology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The flight range of Culicoides variipennis was studied in a bluetongue virus enzootic area during the summer of 1977. Field-collected larvae and pupae were reared to the adult stage in a field laboratory. Approximately 82,200 flies were marked with micronized fluorescent dusts and released and 403 were recaptured in CO2-baited baffle traps. The maximum distance traveled was 0.8 km by a male and 4.0 km by a female. One female was recovered on the release night 2.8 km from the release point. The mean distance traveled (MDT) was 0.8 km on the release night, 2.02 km on one night postrelease, and 2.11 km on two nights postrelease. The MDT for all flies recovered up to eight nights postrelease was 1.89 km.

Based on the overall MDT of 1.89 km, the transmission of a disease agent by C. variipennis becomes theoretically possible if the host population density is greater than one per 3.57 km2. The probability of transmission can be significantly reduced if a 3.57 km2 area surrounding a single C. variipennis breeding site is treated with an effective insecticide.

Résumé

Le rayon d’action de Culicoides variipennis en vol a été étudié dans un secteur enzootique du virus de la fièvre catarrhale du mouton durant l’été 1977. Des larves et pupes collectionnées sur le terrain ont été élevées jusqu’au stade adulte dans un laboratoire de terrain. Environ 82,000 brûlots ont été marqués à l’aide de poussière fluorescente micronisée, et relâchés, et 403 ont été recapturés à l’aide de pièges à impact appâtés au CO2. La distance maximum parcourue a été de 0.8 km par un mâle, et 4.0 km par une femelle. Une femelle a été retrouvée à 2.8 km du site de relâchage, la nuit même du relâchage. La distance moyenne parcourue (DMP) a été de 0.8 km la nuit du relâchage, 2.02 km la première nuit postérieure au relâchage, et de 2.11 km la deuxième nuit. La DMP pour tous les brûlots recapturés jusqu’à 8 nuits postérieures au relâchage a été de 1.89 km.

Sur la base de la DMP globale de 1.89 km, la transmission du pathogène par C. variipennis est théoriquement possible, si la densité de population de l’hôte est supérieure à un par 3.57 km2. La probabilité de transmission peut être significativement réduite par le traitement des 3.57 km2 de surface couvrant le site de reproduction d’un seul C. variipennis à l’aide d’un insecticide efficace.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 113 , Issue 5 , May 1981 , pp. 419 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, S. F., Eliason, D. A., and Hoffmann, B. L.. 1965. Flight and dispersal of the mosquito Culex tarsalis Coquillett in the Sacramento Valley of California. Hilgardia 37: 73–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidlingmayer, W. L. 1957. Studies of Culicoides furens (Poey) at Vero Beach. Mosquito News 17: 292–294.Google Scholar
Bowne, J. G., Luedke, A. J., and Jochim, M. M.. 1967. Bluetongue of sheep and cattle: past, present and future. J. Am. Vet. med. Ass. 151: 1801–1803.Google Scholar
Brust, R. A. 1980. Dispersal behavior of adult Aedes sticticus and Aedes vexans (Diptera: Culicidae) in Manitoba. Can. Ent. 112: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalmat, H. T. 1950. Studies on the flight range of certain Simuliidae with the use of aniline dye marker. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 43: 537–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyce, A. L. 1969. The recognition of nulliparous and parous Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) without dissection. J. Aust. ent. Soc. 8: 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, N. M., Jones, R. H., and McCrory, B. R.. 1963. Preliminary investigations on insect transmission of bluetongue virus in sheep. Am. J. vet. Res. 24: 1195–1200.Google ScholarPubMed
Gillies, M. T. 1961. Studies on the dispersion and survival of Anopheles gambiae Giles in East Africa, by means of marking and release experiments. Bull. ent. Res. 52: 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. L. 1970. Arboviruses known to occur in California and their relationship to different vectors and vertebrate hosts. Proc. Pap. 38th A. Conf. Calif. Mosquito Control Ass. 38: 31–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, J. H., Lowe, R. E., and Schreck, C. E.. 1974. Studies of flight range and survival of Anopheles albimanus Wiedemann in El Salvador. I. Dispersal and survival during the dry season. Mosquito News 34: 389–393.Google Scholar
Hocking, B. 1953. The intrinsic range and speed of flight of insects. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 104: 223–345.Google Scholar
Hoff, G. L., Trainer, D. O., and Jochim, M. M.. 1974. Bluetongue virus and white-tailed deer in an enzootic area of Texas. J. wildl. Dis. 10: 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. 1969. Migration and Dispersal of Insects by Flight. Mutheun, London. 763 pp.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. 1965. Epidemiological notes: incidence of Culicoides variipennis in an outbreak of bluetongue disease. Mosquito News 25: 217–218.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. and Akey, D. H.. 1977. Biting flies attacking holstein cattle in a bluetongue enzootic area in Colorado, 1976. Mosquito News 37: 372–375.Google Scholar
Kettle, D. S. 1951. Some factors affecting the population density and flight range of insects. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 26: 59–63.Google Scholar
Lillie, T. H. et al. 1979. A lightweight, portable, and inexpensive baffle trap for collecting Culicoides variipennis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Mosquito News 39: 675–677.Google Scholar
Luedke, A. J. and Anakwenze, E. I.. 1972. Bluetongue virus in goats. Am. J. vet. Res. 33: 1739–1745.Google ScholarPubMed
McKercher, D. G., McGowan, B., and McCrory, B. R.. 1957. Studies on bluetongue. V. Distribution of bluetongue in the United States as confirmed by diagnostic tests. J. Am. Vet. med. Ass. 130: 86–89.Google ScholarPubMed
Moth, J. J. and Barker, J. S. F.. 1975. Micronized fluorescent dusts for marking Drosophila adults. J. nat. Hist. 9: 393–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. L. and Scrivani, R. P.. 1972. Isolation of arboviruses from parous midges of the Culicoides variipennis complex, and parous rates in biting populations. J. med. Ent. 9: 277–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, D. A. and Hardy, W. T.. 1954. Isolation of the bluetongue virus from Texas sheep-Culicoides shown to be a vector. J. Am. Vet. med. Ass. 124: 255–258.Google ScholarPubMed
Reeves, W. C. et al. 1970. Buttonwillow virus, a new arbovirus isolated from mammals and Culicoides midges in Kern County, California. Am. J. trop. med. Hyg. 19: 544–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trainer, D. O. and Jochim, M. M.. 1969. Serologic evidence of bluetongue in wild ruminants of North America. Am. J. vet. Res. 30: 2007–2011.Google ScholarPubMed
United States Radium Corporation. 1976. Luminescent pigments. Bulletin 40. 80.Google Scholar
Whitehead, F. E. 1935. Damage to livestock by blood sucking midges. Rep. Okla. Exp. Stn. 1932–1934: 264.Google Scholar
Wirth, W. W. and Jones, R. H.. 1957, The North American subspecies of Culicoides variipennis (Diptera: Heleidae). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1170. 35 pp.Google Scholar