Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:13:19.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FACTORS INDUCING DIAPAUSE IN HYPHANTRIA CUNEA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. F. Morris
R. F. Morris
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Department of Forestry and Rural Development, Fredericton, New Brunswick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diapause induction in Hyphantria cunea is under the joint control of photo-period, temperature, humidity, food quality, and possibly other variables, but insufficient data are available to permit a precise evaluation of their actions and interactions. Short daylength and low temperature induce diapause and the critical thresholds for New Brunswick – Nova Scotia populations are in the vicinity of 14.3 hours and 72°F, respectively. Low humidity increases the incidence of diapause, as does also the change in the nutritional quality of foliage late in the season. Both field data and the extrapolation of laboratory data to field conditions indicate that the occurrence of a partial second generation is unlikely in this area, even in warm seasons.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 99 , Issue 5 , May 1967 , pp. 522 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkisson, P. L., Bell, R. A., and Wellso, S. G.. 1963. Environmental factors controlling the induction of diapause in the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders). J. Insect Physiology 9: 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danilevskii, A. S. 1965. Photoperiodism and seasonal development in insects. Oliver & Boyd, London.Google Scholar
Jasic, J., and Macko, V.. 1961. Some results of experimental study of fall webworm (Hyphantria cunea Drury) (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) ecology. Biol. Prace 7 pt. 9 Bratislava.Google Scholar
Jermy, T., and Saringer, G.. 1955. Die Rolle der Photoperiode in der Auslösung der Diapause des Kartoffelkäfers (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) und des amerikanischen weissen Bärenspinners (Hyphantria cunea Drury). Acta agron. Acad. Sci. Hungary 5(3–4): 419–440.Google Scholar
Kovacevic, Z. 1954. Utjecaj hrane na bioticki potencijal dudovca Hyphantria cunea Drury. Biljne proizvodnje 2: 65–78.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1967. Influence of parental food quality on the survival of Hyphantria cunea. Can. Ent. 99: 24–33.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F., and Bennett, C. W.. 1967. Seasonal population trends and extensive census methods for Hyphantria cunea. Can. Ent. 99: 9–17.Google Scholar
Oliver, A. D. 1964. A behavioral study of two races of the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) in Louisiana. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 192–194.Google Scholar