Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:16:43.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors in Resistance of Peas to the Pea Aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harr.) (Homoptera: Aphididae). II. Amino Acids1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. L. Auclair ,
J. B. Maltais  and
J. J. Cartier
J. L. Auclair
Affiliation:
Crop Insect Section, Science Service Laboratory St. Jean, Que.
J. B. Maltais
Affiliation:
Crop Insect Section, Science Service Laboratory St. Jean, Que.
J. J. Cartier
Affiliation:
Crop Insect Section, Science Service Laboratory St. Jean, Que.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In field investigations on the relative resistance of varieties of peas, Pisum sativum L., to the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harr.), the average number of aphids per terminal growth for 13 years (Maltais, 1937, 1950, 1951, and unpublished technical report, 1950-54) for six varieties was as follows: Perfection, 39.6; Daisy, 32.6; Lincoln, 35.6; Laurier (H-103), 9.8; Champion of England, 11.8; and Melting Sugar, 16.8. In a preliminary investigation by Auclair and Maltais (1950), 11 free amino acids were detected in pea plant extracts by paper chromatography. From a visual comparison of chromatograms, the variety Perfection appeared to contain a higher concentration of most free amino acids than the variety Laurier. This is a report on the quantitative estimation of the free and total amino acid contents of the three susceptible varieties (Perfection, Daisy, and Lincoln) and the three resistant varieties (Laurier, Champion of England, and Melting Sugar) by the method of paper chromatography.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 89 , Issue 10 , October 1957 , pp. 457 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auclair, J. L., and Dubreuil, R.. 1952. A simple ultramicromethod for the quantitative estimation of amino acids by paper partition chromatography. Canadian J. Zool. 30: 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auclair, J. L., and Maltais, J. B.. 1950. Studies on the resistance of plants to aphids by the method of paper partition chromatography. Canadian Ent. 82: 175–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auclair, J. L., and Maltais, J. B.. 1952. Occurrence of gamma-aminobutyric acid in extracts of Pisum sativum (L.) and in the honeydew of Myzus cicumflexus (Buck.). Nature 170: 1114–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auclair, J. L., and Maltais, J. B.. 1954. Paper partition chromatography in entomological research. Canadian Ent. 84: 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, R. J., LeStrange, R., and Zweig, G.. 1952. Paper chromatography. A laboratory Anal. Chem. 22: 1327–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, R. J., LaStrange, R., and Zweig, G.. 1952. Paper chromatography. A laboratory manual. Academic Press Inc., New York10, N.Y.Google Scholar
Consden, R., Gordon, A. H., and Martin, A. J. P.. 1944. Qualitative analysis of proteins: a partition Chromatographic method using paper. Biochem. J. 38: 224–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crumpler, H. R., and Dent, C. E.. 1949. Distinctive test for alpha-amino acids in paper chromatography. Nature 164: 441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, G. R. F. 1952. A nutritional investigation of Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.). Ph. D. thesis. McGill University, Montreal, Que.Google Scholar
Dent, C. E. 1948. A study of the behaviour of some sixty amino acids and other ninhydrin reacting substances on phenol-“collidine” filter paper chromatograms, with notes on the occurrence of some of them in biological fluids. Biochem. J. 43: 169–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, L., and DeMeillon, B.. 1948. The nutrition of the larvae of Aedes aegypti L. 4. Protein and amino acid requirements. Biochem. J. (London) 43: 378–387.Google Scholar
Hilchey, J. D. 1953. Studies on the qualitative requirements of Blattella germanica (L.) for amino acids under aseptic conditions. Contrib. Boyce Thompson lnst. 17: 203–219.Google Scholar
Hinton, T., Noyes, D. T., and Ellis, J.. 1951. Amino acids and growth factors in a chemically defined medium for Drosophila. Physiol. Zool. 24: 335–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, H. L. 1949a. Nutritional studies with Blattella germanica (L.) reared under aseptic conditions. II. A chemically defined diet. Canadian Ent. 81: 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, H. L. 1949b. Nutritional studies with Blattella germanica (L.) reared under aseptic conditions. III. Five essential amino acids. Canadian Ent. 81: 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, H. L. 1954. Nutritional studies with Pseudosarcophaga affinis (Fall.), a dipterous parasite of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.). III. Effects of nineteen amino acids on growth. Canadian J. Zool. 32: 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafon, M. 1939. Recherches sur quelques aspects du besoin qualitatif d'azote. Essai sur le besoin qualitatif d'azote chez un insecte: Drosophila melanogaster Meig. Ann. Physiol. physicochim. Biol. 15: 215–260.Google Scholar
Lemonde, A., and Bernard, R.. 1951a. Nutrition des larves de Tribolium confusum Duval. I. Recherche d'un régime synthétique basai satisfaisant leurs besoins nutritifs. Canadian J. Zool. 29: 71–79‥CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemonde, A., and Bernard, R.. 1951b. Nutrition des larves de Tribolium confusum Duval. II. Importance des acides aminés. Canadian J. Zool. 29: 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemonde, A., and Bernard, R.. 1953. Aspects nutritifs des larves de Stegobium paniceum L. (Anobiidae) et d'Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Cucujiidae). Nat. canadien 80: 125–142.Google Scholar
Maltais, J. B. 1937. Resistance of some varieties of peas to the pea aphid, Illinoia pisi Kalt. 67th Ann. Rept. Ent. Soc. Ontario, 1936. pp. 40–45.Google Scholar
Maltais, J. B. 1950. New developments in breeding of peas for resistance to the pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). 80th Ann. Rept. Ent. Soc. Ontario, 1949. pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Maltais, J. B. 1951. The nitrogen content of different varieties of peas as a factor affecting infestations by Macrosiphum pisi (Kltb.) (Homoptera: Aphididae). A preliminary repon. Canadian Em. 83: 29–33.Google Scholar
Maltais, J. B., and Auclair, J. L.. 1957, Fsictors in resistance of peas to the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harr.) (Homoptera: Aphididae). I. The sugar-nitrogen ratio. Canadian Ent. to complete.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miettinen, J. K., Kari, S., Moisio, T., Alfthan, M., and Virtanen, A. I.. 1953. Homoserin als freie Aminosäure in Erbsenpflanzen (Pisum sativum). Suomen Kemistilehti, B, 2: 26–30.Google Scholar
Moore, W. 1946. Nutrition of Attagenus (?) sp. II. (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 39: 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noland, J. L., and Baumann, C. A.. 1951. Protein requirements of Blattella germanica (L.). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 44: 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudkin, G. T., and Schultz, J.. 1947. Evolution of nutritional requirements in animals: amino acids essential for Drosophila melanogaster. Anat Rec. 99: 613.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. F., Zacharius, R. M., and Steward, F. C.. 1951. Investigations on nitrogen compounds and nitrogen metabolism in plants. I. The reaction of nitrogen compounds with ninhydrin on paper: a quantitative procedure. Plant Physiol. 26: 275–297.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. J., and Kirby, H.. 1948. Paper chromatography using capillary ascent. Science 107: 481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed