Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:52:27.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EVOLUTION OF THE METHODS OF SPERMATOPHORE FORMATION IN PTERYGOTAN INSECTS1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. H. Gerber
G. H. Gerber
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A scheme for the evolution of the methods of spermatophore formation among pterygotan insects is proposed. There appear to be four methods of spermatophore formation, two male-determined and two female-determined. The male-determined methods are characteristic of the less advanced pterygotans that have fairly complex spermatophores, and the female-determined types are typical of more advanced insects in which the spermatophores are often reduced.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 102 , Issue 3 , March 1970 , pp. 358 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, C. P. 1919. The crane-flies of New York. I. Distribution and taxonomy of the adult flies. Cornell Univ. agric. Exp. Stn Mem. 25: 767–993.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. H. 1920 a. Fertilization in the honey bee. I. The male sexual organs: their histological structure and physiological functioning. J. exp. Zool. 31: 225–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, G. H. 1920 b. Fertilization in the honey bee. II. Disposal of the sexual fluids in the organs of the female. J. exp. Zool. 31: 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blunck, H. 1912. Das Geschlechtsleben des Dytiscus marginalis L. I. Teil. Die Begattung. Z. wiss. Zool. 102: 169–248.Google Scholar
Bonhag, P. F., and Wick, J. R.. 1953. The functional anatomy of the male and female reproductive systems of the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Dallas) (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). J. Morph. 93: 177–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopard, L. 1934. Sur la présence d',un spermatophore chez certaines insectes Orthoptères de la famille des Phasmides. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 199: 806–807.Google Scholar
Corbet, P. S. 1962. A biology of dragonflies. Witherby, London.Google Scholar
Davey, K. G. 1959. Spermatophore production in Rhodnius prolixus. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 100: 221–230.Google Scholar
Davey, K. G. 1960. The evolution of spermatophores in insects. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 35: 107–113.Google Scholar
Davey, K. G. 1965. Reproduction in the insects. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Davies, L. 1965. On spermatophores in Simuliidae (Diptera). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 40: 30–34.Google Scholar
Downes, J. A. 1968. Notes on the organs and processes of sperm-transfer in the lower Diptera. Can. Ent. 100: 608–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Rozario, A. M. 1940. On the mechanism of copulation in Nematus ribesii. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 15: 69–77.Google Scholar
Finlayson, L. H. 1949. The life-history and anatomy of Lepinotus patruelis Pearman (Psocoptera-Atropidae). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 119: 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, T. W. 1959. Occurrence of spermatophores in certain species of Chilocorus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 35: 205–208.Google Scholar
Gerber, G. H. 1968. Structure, formation, histochemistry, fate and functions of the spermatophore of the caragana blister beetle, Lytta nuttalli Say (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.Google Scholar
Gerber, G. H., Church, N. S., and Rempel, J. G.. Structure, formation, histochemistry, fate and functions of the spermatophore of Lytta nuttalli Say (Coleoptera: Meloidae). In preparation.Google Scholar
Giglioli, M. E. C., and Mason, G. F.. 1966. The mating plug in anopheline mosquitoes. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 41: 123–129.Google Scholar
Gillies, M. T. 1956. A new character for the recognition of nulliparous females of Anopheles gambiae. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 15: 451–459.Google ScholarPubMed
Gregory, G. E. 1965. The formation and fate of the spermatophore in the African migratory locust, Locusta migratoria migratorioides Reiche and Fairmaire. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 117: 33–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P. D. 1946. On the structure and formation of the spermatophore in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana (Linn.). Indian J. Ent. 8: 79–84.Google Scholar
Hewer, H. R. 1934. Studies in Zygaena (Lepidoptera). II. The mechanism of copulation and the passage of the sperm in the female. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1934: 513–527.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. P. 1911. The structure and systematic importance of the spermatophores of crickets. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 4: 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalifa, A. 1949 a. The mechanism of insemination and the mode of action of the spermatophore in Gryllus domesticus. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 90: 281–292.Google Scholar
Khalifa, A. 1949 b. Spermatophore production in Trichoptera and some other insects. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 100: 449–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalifa, A. 1950 a. Spermatophore production in Blattella germanica. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 25: 53–61.Google Scholar
Khalifa, A. 1950 b. Spermatophore production and egg-laying behaviour in Rhodnius prolixus. Parasitology 40: 283–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalifa, A. 1950 c. Spermatophore production in Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 25: 33–42.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, H. H. 1944. Artificial insemination of the queen bee (Apis mellifera): morphological basis and results. J. Morph. 74: 429–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landa, V. 1960. Origin, development and function of the spermatophore in the cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha L.). Cas. čsl. Spol. ent. 57: 297–316.Google Scholar
LeFeuvre, W. P. 1939. A phasmid with spermatophore. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 14: 24.Google Scholar
Lum, P. T. M. 1961. The reproductive system of some Florida mosquitoes. II. The male accessory glands and their role. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54: 430–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, E. T. 1959. Copulation in Glyptotendipes (Phytotendipes) paripes Edwards. Nature, Lond. 184: 1252–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, M. J. 1932. Contributions towards the study of insect fertility. I. The structure and operation of the reproductive organs of the genera Ephestia and Plodia (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1932: 595–611.Google Scholar
Pomeranzew, B. I. 1932. Beiträge zur Morphologie und Anatomie der Genitalien von Culicoides (Diptera: Nematocera). Mag. Parasit. Leningr. 3: 183–214.Google Scholar
Roth, L. M., and Willis, E. R.. 1954. The reproduction of cockroaches. Smithson. misc. Collns. 122 (12): 1–49.Google Scholar
Srivastava, U. S., and Srivastava, B. P.. 1957. Notes on the spermatophore and transference of sperms in the female reproductive organs of Leucinodes orbonalis Gren. (Lepidoptera: Pyraustidae). Zool. Anz. 158: 258–267.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1917. The biology of dragonflies (Odonata or Paraneuroptera). University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. 1965. The principles of insect physiology. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Williams, J. L. 1939. The occurrence of spermatophores and their measurements in some British Lepidoptera. Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 6: 137–148.Google Scholar
Williams, J. L. 1941. The relations of the spermatophore to the female reproductive ducts in Lepidoptera. Ent. News 52: 61–65.Google Scholar
Withycombe, C. L. 1922. Notes on the biology of some British Neuroptera (Planipennia). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 1922: 501–594.Google Scholar
Withycombe, C. L. 1924. Some aspects of the biology and morphology of the Neuroptera. With special reference to the immature stages and their possible phylogenetic significance. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 1924: 303–311.Google Scholar
Zacharuk, R. Y. 1958. Structure and functions of the reproductive systems of the prairie grain wireworm, Ctenicera aeripennis destructor (Brown) (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Can. J. Zool. 36: 725–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar