Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:10:07.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EVALUATION OF FOLIAR SPRAYS AGAINST THE TUBER FLEA BEETLE, EPITRIX TUBERIS GENTNER (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE), ON POTATO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R.S. Vernon  and
J.R. Mackenzie
R.S. Vernon
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, 6660 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1X2
J.R. Mackenzie
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, 6660 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1X2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The efficacies of registered and unregistered foliar sprays against the tuber flea beetle, Epitrix tuberis Gentner, were compared in 1987, 1988, and 1989 at Abbotsford, B.C. Beetles were released serially in treatment plots and visually counted after each release to determine the effectiveness and longevity of residual control. In 1989, emergence cages placed over previously treated plants measured the effect of sprays on the next generation of beetles. Pyrethroids generally resulted in beetle mortality for longer periods of time than did the nonpyrethroids carbaryl, endosulfan, chlorpyrifos, and methamidophos. Several pyrethroids provided residual beetle control for up to 7 days after application. In 1989, bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, and deltamethrin were as effective in suppressing emergence of the next generation of beetles as was granular phorate applied at seeding. These studies demonstrated that foliar sprays can be a key component of E. tuberis management programs, especially those operating on soil types where the use of granular insecticides is restricted.

Résumé

L’efficacité des substances enregistrés et non-enregistrés pour l’arrosage des feuilles contre l’altise des tubercules, Epitrix tuberis Gentner, a été comparée en 1987, 1988 et 1989 à Abbotsford, C.B. Les altises adultes ont été relâchées en série aux terrains de traitement et ont été comptées visuellement après chaque relâchement pour déterminer l’efficacité et la durée résiduelle du contrôle. En 1989, les cages d’éclosion, mises par-dessus des plantes traitées auparavant, ont laissé déterminer l’effet des substances d’arrosage pour la génération suivante des altises adultes. Les pyréthroïdes ont opéré normalement pour occasionner la mortalité des altises adultes pendant une durée plus étendue que les carbaryles, l’endosulfane, le chlorpyrifos et le méthamidophos. Plusieurs sortes de pyréthroïdes ont fourni un contrôle résiduel des altises adultes jusqu’à 7 jours suivant l’arrosage. En 1989, bifenthrine, cyfluthrine, cyperméthrine et deltométhrine ont été aussi efficaces à supprimer l’éclosion de la génération suivante des altises adultes que la phorate granuleuse arrosée au moment des semailles. Ces études démontrent que les substances arroseurs de feuilles peuvent agir comme constituants-clés aux programmes de contrôle de E. tuberis, surtout sur les sols où l’utilisation d’insecticides granuleux est restreinte.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 123 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 321 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1989. Vegetable Production Guide for Commercial Growers. Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Victoria, B.C.Google Scholar
Campbell, C.J., and Finlayson, D.G.. 1976. Comparative efficacy of insecticides against tuber flea beetle and aphids in potatoes in British Columbia. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56: 869–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusson, M., Vernon, R.S., and Roitberg, B.. 1990. A sequential sampling plan for the tuber flea beetle, Epitrix tuberis, using Taylor's power law: Dealing with edge effects. Can. Ent. 122: 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, D.G., Brown, M.J., Campbell, C.J., Wilkinson, A.T.S., and Williams, I.H.. 1972. Insecticides against tuber flea beetle on potatoes in British Columbia (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera). J. ent. Soc. Brit. Columb. 69: 9–13.Google Scholar
Finlayson, D.G., Wilkinson, A.T.S., and Mackenzie, J.R.. 1979. Efficacy of insecticides against tuber flea beetles, wireworms and aphids in potatoes. J. ent. Soc. Brit. Columb. 76: 6–9.Google Scholar
Fulton, H.G., Banham, F.L., and Neilson, C.L.. 1955. The tuber flea beetle in British Columbia. Can. Dept. Agric. Publ. 938. Ottawa, Ont.Google Scholar
Giles, K.I. 1987. Estimation of an economic threshold for the tuber flea beetle, Epitrix tuberis Gentner (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), on potato in British Columbia. Master of Pest Management Professional Paper, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.Google Scholar
Letendre, G. 1985 a. Evaluation of insecticides for the control of potato foliar insects, 1985. Pesticide Res. Rep. 108. Agric. Can., Ottawa.Google Scholar
Letendre, G. 1985 b. Evaluation of insecticides for the control of potato foliar insects, 1985. Pesticide Res. Rep. 109. Agric. Can., Ottawa.Google Scholar
Letendre, G., and Passerini, J.. 1986. Evaluation of foliar insecticides for the control of insect pests, 1986. Pesticide Res. Rep. 100. Agric. Can., Ottawa.Google Scholar
Neilson, C.L., and Finlayson, D.G.. 1953. Notes on the biology of the tuber flea beetle, Epitrix tuberis Gent. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in the interior of British Columbia. Can. Ent. 85: 31–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, R.S., and Mackenzie, J.R.. 1991. Granular insecticides against overwintered tuber flea beetle, Epitrix tuberis Gentner (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), on potato. Can. Ent. 123: 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, R.S., Mackenzie, J.R., and Bartel, D.L.. 1990. Monitoring tuber flea beetle, Epitrix tuberis Gentner (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), on potato: Parameters affecting the accuracy of visual sampling. Can. Ent. 122: 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar