Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:56:54.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ELECTROPHORETIC EVIDENCE THAT LASIOGLOSSUM (EVYLAEUS) MEDITERRANEUM (BLÜTHGEN) IS A SPECIES DISTINCT FROM L. (E.) LATICEPS (SCHENCK) (HYMENOPTERA, HALICTIDAE), WITH NOTES ON ITS PHYLOGENETIC POSITION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L. Packer ,
C. Plateaux-Quénu  and
R.E. Owen
L. Packer
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, North York, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3
C. Plateaux-Quénu
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie du Comportement, Université de Nancy I, B.P. 239, 54506 Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy Cedex, France
R.E. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Mount Royal College, 4825 Richmond Road SW, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaT3E 6K6and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that Lasioglossum mediterraneum (Blüthgen) (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) is a species distinct from L. laticeps (Schenck) based upon electrophoretic analysis of 39 allozyme loci for sympatric populations collected from the Dordogne region of France. The genetic identity between the two is below average for sibling species of insects: no fewer than 10 fixed allelic differences were found. In contrast, allopatric L. laticeps populations (from the Dordogne and Paris) are genetically almost identical (I = 0.998). Heterozygosity estimates for both species are low, as is often the case with Hymenoptera. Diagnostic characteristics that can be used to separate the two species are described. A phylogeny for nine species of the subgenus Evylaeus is constructed from allozyme data.

Résumé

Nous démontrons ici que Lasioglossum mediterraneum (Blüthgen) (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) est une espèce distincte de L. laticeps (Schenck) en nous basant sur les résultats de l’électrophorèse de 39 allozymes de populations sympatriques échantillonnées dans la région de la Dordogne, France. L’identité génétique des deux espèces est au-dessous de la moyenne pour des espèces soeurs; pas moins de 10 différences d’allèles fixes ont été trouvées. Par ailleurs, des populations allopatriques de L. laticeps (de la Dordogne et de la région de Paris) se sont avérées presque identiques génétiquement (I = 0,998). L’estimation de l’hétérozygotie chez les deux espèces a donné des valeurs faibles, comme c’est souvent le cas chez des Hyménoptères. Les caractéristiques diagnostiques qui permettent de reconnaître les deux espèces sont décrites. Une phylogénie de neuf espèces du sous-genre Evylaeus a été reconstituée d’après les données sur les allozymes.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 124 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 371 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blüthgen, P. 1924. Contribution al conocimiento de las especies espanolas de “Halictus” (Hym. Apidae). Mem. Soc. Espanola Hist. Nat. 11: 331–544.Google Scholar
Blüthgen, P. 1926. Beitrage zur Synonymie der Bienengattung Halictus Latr. IV. Dtsch. ent. Ztschr. 1925: 385–419.Google Scholar
Brussard, P.F., Ehrlich, P.R., Murphy, D.D., Wilcox, B.A., and Wright, J.. 1985. Genetic distances and the taxonomy of checkerspot butterflies (Nymphalidae: Nymphalinae). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 58: 403–412.Google Scholar
Buth, D.G. 1984. The application of electrophoretic data in systematic studies. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bytinski-Salz, H., and Ebmer, A.W.. 1974. The Halictidae of Israel (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). II. Genus Lasioglossum. Isr. J. ent. 9: 175–217.Google Scholar
Crespi, B.J. 1991. Heterozygosity in the haplodiploid Thysanoptera. Evolution 45: 458–464.Google ScholarPubMed
Do-Pham, T.T., Plateaux-Quénu, C., and Plateaux, L.. 1984. Étude comparative des genitalia males de quelques Halictinae (Hymenoptera) repercussion eventuelle sur la classification. Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. 20: 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebmer, A.W. 1978. Halictus, Lasioglossum, Rophites und Systropha aus dem Iran. Linzer biol. Beitr. 10: 1–109.Google Scholar
Ebmer, A.W. 1981. Halictus und Lasioglossum aus Kreta. Linzer biol. Beitr. 13: 101–127.Google Scholar
Eickwort, G.C., and Eickwort, K.R.. 1971. Aspects of the biology of Costa Rican halictine bees, II Dialictus umbripennis and adaptations of its caste structure to different climates. J. Kans. ent. Soc. 44: 343–373.Google Scholar
Farris, J.S. 1988. Hennig: Hennig86 reference, version 1.5.Published by the author.Google Scholar
Farris, J.S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michener, C.D. 1990. Reproduction and castes in social halictine bees. pp. 75–119 in Engels, W. (Ed.), Social Insects: An Evolutionary Approach to Castes and Reproduction. Springer, Berlin. 264 pp.Google Scholar
Mickevich, M.F., and Mitter, C.. 1981. Treating polymorphic characters in systematics: A phylogenetic treatment of electrophoretic data. pp. 45–58in Funk, V.A., and Brooks, D.R. (Eds.), Advances in Cladistics, Vol. 1. New York Botanic Gardens, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Murphy, R.W., Sites, J.W., Buth, D.G., and Haufler, C.H.. 1990. Proteins I: Isozyme electrophoresis. pp. 45–126 in Hillis, D.M., and Moritz, C. (Eds.), Molecular Systematics. Sinauer, Sunderland. 588 pp.Google Scholar
Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Packer, L. 1986. The social organisation of Halictus ligatus in southern Ontario. Can. J. Zool. 64: 2317–2324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, L. 1990. Solitary and eusocial nests in a population of Augochlorella striata (Provancher) (Hymenoptera; Halictidae) at the northern edge of its range. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27: 339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, L. 1991. The evolution of social behavior and nest architecture in sweat bees of the subgenus Evylaeus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae): A phylogenetic approach. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, L., and Knerer, G.. 1986. The biology of a subtropical population of Halictus ligatus Say (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). I. Phenology and social organisation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18: 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, L., and Owen, R.E.. 1989. Allozyme variation in Halictus rubicundus (Christ): A primitively social halictine bee (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Can. Ent. 121: 1049–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, L., and Owen, R.E.. 1990. Allozyme variation, linkage disequilibrium and diploid male production in a primitively social bee Augochlorella striata (Hymenoptera; Halictidae). Heredity 65: 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, L., and Owen, R.E.. 1992. Variable enzyme systems in the Hymenoptera. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 20: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakagami, S.F., and Munakata, M.. 1972. Distribution and bionomics of a transpalaearctic eusocial halictine bee, Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) calceatum, in northern Japan, with reference to its solitary life cycle at high altitude. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. Ser. 6: Zool. 18: 411–439.Google Scholar
Sanderson, M.J., and Donoghue, M.J.. 1989. Patterns and variation in homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1781–1795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholl, A., Obrecht, E., and Owen, R.E.. 1990. The genetic relationship between Bombus moderatus Cresson and the Bombus lucorum auct. species complex (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can. J. Zool. 68: 2264–2268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R.S., and Rhomberg, L.R.. 1987. A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Estimates of heterozygosity and patterns of geographic differentiation. Genetics 117: 255–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swofford, D.L., and Selander, R.B.. 1989. Biosys-1: A computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in population genetics and biochemical systematics. Illinois Natural History Survey. 43 pp.Google Scholar
Warncke, K. 1981. Beitrag zur Bienenfauna des Iran 14. Die Gattung Halictus Latr., mit Bemerkungen uber Bekannte und neue Halictus-arten in der Westpalaarktis und Zentralasien. Boll. Mus. Civ. Venezia 32: 67–166.Google Scholar
Webb, E.C. 1984. Enzyme Nomenclature: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry on the Nomenclature and Classification of Enzyme-catalysed Reactions. Academic Press, Orlando, FL. 646 pp.Google Scholar