Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:39:12.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of prey resource fluctuation on predation attributes of two sympatric Coccinellidae (Coleoptera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2015

Desh Deepak Chaudhary ,
Bhupendra Kumar ,
Geetanjali Mishra  and
Omkar
Desh Deepak Chaudhary
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
Bhupendra Kumar
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
Geetanjali Mishra
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
Omkar*
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under natural conditions, prey resources may fluctuate considerably in space and time; and predators are continuously faced with challenges of resource availability and use. In this study, effects of fluctuations (scarce/optimal/abundant) in biomass of pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris); Hemiptera: Aphididae) during rearing and experimental conditions on certain predatory attributes (consumption rate/conversion, efficiency/growth rate) of two sympatric aphidophagous Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) were evaluated. Results revealed significant influence of rearing conditions on conversion efficiency and growth rate; and experimental conditions on all three predation attributes of Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Larvae/adults of M. sexmaculatus had similar consumption rates per rearing condition, but exhibited highest and lowest consumption rates when abruptly shifted to abundant and scarce prey experimental conditions. Further, scarce prey reared larvae/adults of M. sexmaculatus displayed highest conversion efficiency and growth rate on optimal/abundant prey experimental condition(s). However, all three predation attributes of larvae/adults of Propylea dissecta (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) were influenced substantially by both the rearing and experimental conditions; and scarce prey reared larvae/adults exhibited highest predation attributes on optimal/abundant prey experimental condition(s). Moreover, predation attributes of M. sexmaculatus were higher than P. dissecta on the three experimental conditions. Therefore, this study suggests that M. sexmaculatus has a better compensatory ability to overcome prey resource fluctuation than P. dissecta.

Type
Behaviour & Ecology
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 148 , Issue 4 , August 2016 , pp. 443 - 451
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Hervé Colinet

References

Agarwala, B.K., Yasuda, H., and Sato, S. 2008. Life history response of a predatory ladybird, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to food stress. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 43: 183–189.Google Scholar
Atlihan, R. and Guldal, H. 2009. Prey density-dependent feeding activity and life history of Scymnus subvillosus . Phytoparasitica, 37: 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros-Bellanda, H.C.H. and Zucoloto, F.S. 2002. Effects of intraspecific competition and food deprivation on the immature phase of Ascia monuste orseis (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Iheringia Serie Zoologia, 92: 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnazar, T. and Madadi, H. 2015. Functional response of different stages of Hippodamia variegata (Col: Coccinellidae) to Diuraphis noxia (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on two wheat cultivars. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 25: 1180–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieber, C. and Ruf, T. 2005. Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa: ecology, elasticity of growth rate, and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42: 1203–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bista, M. and Omkar., 2014. Consumption, developmental and reproductive attributes of two con-generic ladybird predators under variable prey supply. Biological Control, 74: 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhary, D.D., Kumar, B., Mishra, G., and Omkar., 2015. Resource partitioning in a ladybird, Menochilus sexmaculatus: function of body size and prey density. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 105: 121–128.Google Scholar
Dixon, A.F.G. 2000. Insect predator-prey dynamics: ladybird beetles and biological control, 1st edition. Cambridge University Press, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Dixon, A.F.G. and Guo, Y. 1993. Egg and cluster size in ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): the direct and indirect effects of aphid abundance. European Journal of Entomology, 90: 457–463.Google Scholar
Dmitriew, C., Carroll, J., and Rowe, L. 2009. Effects of early growth conditions on body composition, allometry, and survival in the ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis . Canadian Journal of Zoology, 87: 175–182.Google Scholar
Dmitriew, C. and Rowe, L. 2007. Effects of early resource limitation and compensatory growth on lifetime fitness in the ladybird beetles (Harmonia axyridis). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20: 1298–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, F., Haubruge, E., Defrance, T., and Gaspar, C. 2000. Environmentally based maternal effect on reproduction of Adalia bipunctata: impact of aphid prey species. Mededelingen-Faculteit Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen, Universiteit Gent, 65: 303–310.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, T. and Laakso, J. 2013. The relative importance of competition and predation in environment characterized by resource pulses – an experimental test with a microbial community. BMC Ecology, 13: 29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodek, I. and Honek, A. 1996. Ecology of coccinellidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hodek, I., Van, Emden, H.F., and Honek, A. 2012. Ecology and behaviour of the ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae). John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Holt, R.D. 2008. Theoretical perspective on resource pulses. Ecology, 89: 671–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isikber, A.A. and Copland, M.J.W. 2001. Food consumption and utilization by larvae of two coccinellid predators, Scymnus levaillanti, and Cycloneda sanguinea, on cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii . BioControl, 46: 455–467.Google Scholar
Ives, A.R., Kareiva, P., and Perry, R. 1993. Response of a predator to variation in prey density at three hierarchical scales: lady beetles feeding on aphids. Ecology, 74: 1929–1938.Google Scholar
Karsai, I. and Hunt, J.H. 2002. Food quantity affects traits of offspring in a paper wasp, Polistes metricus . Environmental Entomology, 31: 99–106.Google Scholar
Keshavarz, M., Seiedy, M., and Allahyari, H. 2015. Preference of two populations of Propylea quatuordecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) for Aphis fabae and Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae). European Journal of Entomology, 112: 560–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kӧhler, G., Brodhun, H.P., and Schäller, G. 1987. Ecological energetics of central European grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia, 74: 112–121.Google Scholar
Kumar, B., Bista, M., Mishra, G., and Omkar., 2014a. Stage specific consumption and utilization of aphids, conspecific and heterospecific eggs by two species of Coccinella (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology, 111: 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, B., Mishra, G., and Omkar., 2014b. Functional response and predatory interactions within conspecific and heterospecific guilds of two congeneric species (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology, 111: 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, B., Pandey, G., Mishra, G., and Omkar., 2013. Predatory performance of aphidophagous ladybirds: a measure of prey suitability? International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 33: 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.H. and Kang, T.J. 2004. Functional response of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) in the laboratory. Biological Control, 31: 306–310.Google Scholar
Lucas, E., Demougeot, S., Vincent, C., and Coderre, D. 2004. Predation upon the oblique-banded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by two aphidophagous coccinellids (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the presence and absence of aphids. European Journal of Entomology, 101: 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurice, N. and Ashwani, K. 2011. Effect of quantity and consumption of food on body weight and development of two species of ladybird beetles. Annals of Plant Protection Science, 19: 59–62.Google Scholar
Mishra, G., Kumar, B., Shahid, M., Singh, D., and Omkar., 2011. Evaluation of four co-occurring ladybirds for use as biocontrol agents of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae). Biocontrol Science and Technology, 21: 991–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, G., Omkar, Kumar, B., and Pandey, G. 2012. Stage and age-specific predation in four aphidophagous ladybird beetles. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 22: 463–476.Google Scholar
Moreau, J., Berney, B., and Thiery, D. 2006. Assessing larval food quality for phytophagous insects: are the facts as simple as they appear? Functional Ecology, 20: 592–600.Google Scholar
Omkar, Mishra, G., Kumar, B., Singh, N., and Pandey, G. 2014. Risks associated with tandem release of large and small ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in heterospecific aphidophagous guilds. The Canadian Entomologist, 146: 52–66.Google Scholar
Omkar, Mishra, G., Srivastava, S., Gupta, A.K., and Singh, S.K. 2005. Reproductive performance of four aphidophagous ladybirds on cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch. Journal of Applied Entomology, 129: 217–220.Google Scholar
Omkar, Sahu, J., and Kumar, G. 2010. Effect of prey quantity in a ladybird beetle, Anegleis cardoni (Weise) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 30: 48–56.Google Scholar
Ostfeld, R.S. and Keesing, F. 2000. The function of biodiversity in the ecology of vector-borne zoonotic diseases. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78: 2061–2078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phoofolo, M.W., Giles, K.L., and Elliott, N.C. 2007. Quantitative evaluation of suitability of the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum, and the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi, as prey for Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biological Control, 41: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakhshan, R. and Ahmad, M.E. 2015. Predatory efficiency of Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) against Aphis craccivora Koch on various host plants of family Fabaceae. European Scientific Journal, 11: 154–161.Google Scholar
Ramdev, Y.P. and Rao, P.J. 1979. Consumption and utilization of castor by semilooper Achaea janata . Indian Journal of Entomology, 41: 260–266.Google Scholar
Rhamahalinghan, M. 1987. Feeding behaviour of Coccinella septempunctata L. var. confusa Wiedemann (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in relation to temperature – I. Pre-oviposition period. Journal Entomological Research, 11: 178–183.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Schellhorn, N.A. and Andow, D.A. 1999b. Cannibalism and interspecific predation: role of oviposition behavior. Ecological Applications, 9: 418–428.Google Scholar
Schüder, I., Hommes, M., and Larink, O. 2004. The influence of temperature and food supply on the development of Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology, 101: 379–384.Google Scholar
Seagraves, M.P. 2009. Lady beetle oviposition behavior in response to the trophic environment. Biological Control, 51: 313–322.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, A., Omkar, Paul, S.C., and Mishra, G. 2015. Predatory responses of selected lines of developmental variants of ladybird, Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in relation to increasing prey and predator densities. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 25(9): 992–1010.Google Scholar
Synder, W.E., Joseph, S.B., Preziosi, R.F., and Moore, A.J. 2000. Nutritional benefits of cannibalism for the ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) when quality is poor. Environmental Entomology, 29: 1173–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J.D., Glover, M.D., Moseley, J.B., and Moore, A.J. 1999. Heritability and fitness consequences of cannibalism in Harmonia axyridis . Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1: 375–388.Google Scholar
Waldbauer, G.P. 1968. The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Advances in Insect Physiology, 5: 229–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L.H. 2004. Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in North American forests. Science, 306: 1565–1567.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Chaudhary supplementary material

Table S1

Download Chaudhary supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 113.3 KB