Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:26:23.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DIFFERENTIAL BIOACTIVITY OF CONOPHTHORIN ON FOUR SPECIES OF NORTH AMERICAN BARK BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Dezene P.W. Huber ,
John H. Borden ,
Nicole L. Jeans-Williams  and
Regine Gries
Dezene P.W. Huber*
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
John H. Borden
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Nicole L. Jeans-Williams
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Regine Gries
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
*
1 Author to whom all corresponding should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The angiosperm bark volatile, conophthorin, was tested at release rates of 3.0 and 0.3 mg/24 h against the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, the spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby), the pine engraver, Ips pint (Say), and the western balsam bark beetle, Dryocoetes confusus Swaine (all Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The responses of D. pseudotsugae, I. pini, and (in one of two experiments) female D. confusus to attractant-baited traps were disrupted by conophthorin in a dose-dependent manner. Dendroctonus rufipennis was not disrupted by conophthorin. Our results extend the repellent bioactivity of conophthorin to Ips DeGeer spp. and confirm earlier experiments with D. pseudotsugae. Conophthorin may have some utility in protecting susceptible timber from bark beetle attack.

Résumé

La conophtorine, une substance volatile de l’écorce des angiospermes, a été testée à des taux d’émission de 3,0 et de 0,3 mg/24 h chez quatre espèces de scolytes, le Dendroctone du Douglas, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, le Dendroctone de l’épinette, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby), le Scolyte du pin, Ips pini (Say) et le Scolyte du sapin de l’ouest, Dryocoetes confusus Swaine. Les réactions de D. pseudotsugae et d’I. pini (au cours de l’une de deux expériences) et des femelles de D. confusus à des pièges garnis d’une substance attirante ont été perturbées par la conophthorine et cela en fonction de la dose. Dendroctonus rufipennis ne réagit pas à la conophthorine. Nos résultats démontrent que l’effet repoussant de la conophthorine agit aussi sur Ips DeGeer et confirment les résultats d’expériences antérieures sur D. pseudotsugae. La conophthorine peut s’avérer utile pour protéger le bois coupé des invasions de scolytes.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 132 , Issue 5 , October 2000 , pp. 649 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birgersson, G., Debarr, G.L., de Groot, P., Dalusky, M.J., Pierce, H.D. Jr, Borden, J.H., Meyer, H., Francke, W., Espelie, K.E., Berisford, C.W. 1995. Pheromones in the white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 143–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borden, J.H., Wilson, I.M., Gries, R., Chong, L.J., Pierce, H.D. Jr, Gries, G. 1998. Volatiles from the bark of trembling aspen, Populus tremuloides Michx. (Salicaceae), disrupt secondary attraction by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Chemoecology 8: 69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H., Huber, D.P.W., Gries, R., Pierce, H.D. Jr, Chong, L.J., Gries, G., Wilson, I.M. 2000. Non-host volatiles as repellents for conifer-infesting bark beetles. US Patent No. 6051612Google Scholar
Byers, J.A., Zhang, Q.H., Schlyter, F., Birgersson, G. 1998. Volatiles from nonhost birch trees inhibit pheromone response in spruce bark beetles. Naturwissenschaften 85: 557–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallara, P.L., Seybold, S.J., Francke, W., Wood, D.L. 1995. The chemical ecology of Pityophthorus Eichhoff (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in central coastal California. pp. lxviii–lxix in Adams, D.H., Rios, J.E., Storer, A.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the California Forest Pest Council, Rancho Cordova, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
Day, R.W., Quinn, G.P. 1989. Comparisons of treatments after and analysis of variance in ecology. Ecological Monographs 59: 433–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, D.P.W., Gries, R., Borden, J.H., Pierce, H.D. Jr., 1999. Two pheromones of coniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) found in the bark of nonhost angiosperms. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 805–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, D.P.W., Gries, R., Borden, J.H., Pierce, H.D. Jr., 2000. A survey of antennal responses by five species of coniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees. Chemoecology. In pressGoogle Scholar
Kohnle, U., Densborn, S., Kölsch, P., Meyer, H., Francke, W. 1992. E-7-methyl-1,6-dioxaspiro[4.5]decane in the chemical communication of European Scolytidae and Nitidulidae (Coleoptera). Journal of Applied Entomology 114: 187–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, B.S. 1983. A multiple funnel trap for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera). The Canadian Entomologist 115: 299–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, H.D. Jr, de Groot, P., Borden, J.H., Ramaswamy, S., Oehlschlager, A.C. 1995. Pheromones in red pine cone beetle, Conophthorus resinosae Hopkins, and its synonym, C. bankianae McPherson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 169–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT® users guide, release 6.03 edition. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Wilson, I.M., Borden, J.H., Gries, R., Gries, G. 1996. Green leaf volatiles as antiaggregants for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 22: 1861–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed., pp. 236–42. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar