Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:49:11.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biology of the European oak borer in Michigan, United States of America, with comparisons to the native twolined chestnut borer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2013

Toby R. Petrice  and
Robert A. Haack
Toby R. Petrice*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1407 S. Harrison Rd., Rm. 220, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, United States of America
Robert A. Haack
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1407 S. Harrison Rd., Rm. 220, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, United States of America
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2010–2011, we studied the European oak borer (EOB), Agrilus sulcicollis Lacordaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), in Michigan, United States of America, and made comparisons with the native twolined chestnut borer (TLCB), Agrilus bilineatus (Weber). EOB adult flight began and peaked before TLCB. More EOB females were captured on purple and white compared with yellow and green sticky traps. More TLCB females were captured on purple, followed by yellow, green, and white, respectively. Male EOB and TLCB did not show a significant colour preference. EOB completed development primarily from areas of artificially girdled trees where the phloem had died soon after trees were girdled, while TLCB usually developed in areas of girdled trees that had some live phloem present. Both EOB and TLCB successfully attacked and emerged from girdled Quercus alba Linnaeus, Quercus robur Linnaeus, and Quercus rubra Linnaeus (Fagaceae) trees. No live EOB or TLCB were found in two ungirdled and apparently healthy Q. robur trees that were dissected. EOB attacked and emerged from Q. alba, Q. robur, Q. rubra, and Quercus velutina Lamarck trap logs. Differences in the pronotal groove and terminal processes can be used to distinguish EOB from TLCB larvae. Five species of parasitoids were reared from EOB and four from TLCB.

Résumé

Nous avons étudié en 2010–2011 l'agrile européen du chêne (EOB), Agrilus sulcicollis Lacordaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), au Michigan, États-Unis d'Amérique, et l'avons comparé à l'agrile du châtaignier (TLCB), Agrilus bilineatus (Weber), une espèce indigène. La période de vol de EOB débute et atteint son sommet avant celle de TLCB. Plus de femelles EOB ont été capturées sur des pièges collants violets et blancs que sur des pièges jaunes et verts. Le plus grand nombre de femelles TLCB a été capturé sur des pièges violets, puis par ordre sur des jaunes, des verts et des blancs. Les mâles EOB et TLCB ne montrent aucune préférence significative de couleur. Les EOB complètent leur développement principalement dans des zones d'arbres annelés artificiellement chez lesquels le phloème est mort peu après l'annélation des arbres, alors que les TLCB se développement généralement dans des zones d'arbres annelés chez lesquels il reste du phloème vivant. Tant les EOB que les TLCB attaquent avec succès les chênes Quercus alba Linnaeus, Q. robur Linnaeus et Q. rubra Linnaeus (Fagaceae) annelés et en émergent. Aucun EOB ni TLCB vivant n'a été trouvé lors de la dissection de deux chênes Q. robur non annelés et à apparence saine. Les EOB attaquent les billes de chênes Q. alba, Q. robur, Q. rubra et Q. velutina Lamarck utilisées comme pièges (trap logs) et en émergent. Des différences dans le sillon du pronotum et des processus terminaux peuvent servir à distinguer les larves de EOB et de TLCB. Cinq espèces de parasitoïdes ont été obtenues par élevage de EOB et quatre de TLCB.

Type
Behaviour and Ecology
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 146 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 36 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada. This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Jon Sweeney

References

Bauer, L.S., Liu, H.-P., Haack, R.A., Gao, R.-T., Zhao, T.-H., Miller, D.L., et al. 2005. Update on emerald ash borer natural enemies in Michigan and China [online]. In Proceedings of the emerald ash borer research and technology meeting, Romulus, MI. Edited by V. Mastro and R. Reardon. USDA FS FHTET-2004-15. United States Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. Pp. 71–72. Available from http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/9610 [accessed 27 July 2013].Google Scholar
Bílý, S. 1982. The Buprestidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, 10: 1–110.Google Scholar
Bílý, S. 1999. Larvae of buprestid beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) of Central Europe. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, Supplement 9: 1–45.Google Scholar
Bílý, S. 2002. Summary of the bionomy of the buprestid beetles of Central Europe (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, Supplement 10: 1–104.Google Scholar
Cappaert, D. McCullough, D.G. 2009. Occurrence and seasonal abundance of Atanycolus cappaerti (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a native parasitoid of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Great Lakes Entomologist, 42: 16–29.Google Scholar
Cappaert, D., McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., Siegert, N.W. 2005. Emerald ash borer in North America: a research and regulatory challenge. American Entomologist, 51: 152–165.Google Scholar
Chamorro, M.L., Volkovitsh, M.G., Poland, T.M., Haack, R.A., Lingafelter, S.W. 2012. Preimaginal stages of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): an invasive pest on ash trees (Fraxinus). PLoS One, 7: e33185. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033185.Google Scholar
Cote, W.A. III. Allen, D.C. 1980. Biology of two-lined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus, in Pennsylvania and New York. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 73: 409–413.Google Scholar
Crook, D.J., Francese, J.A., Zylsra, K.E., Fraser, I., Sawyer, A.J., Bartels, D.W., et al. 2009. Laboratory and field response of the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), to the selected regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102: 2160–2169.Google Scholar
Duan, J.J., Bauer, L.S., Abell, K.J., van Driesche, R. 2012. Population responses of hymenopteran parasitoids to the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in recently invaded areas in north central United States. Biological Control, 57: 199–209.Google Scholar
Duan, J.J., Fuester, R.W., Wildonger, J., Taylor, P.B., Barth, S., Spichiger, S.E. 2009. Parasitoids attacking the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in western Pennsylvania. Florida Entomologist, 92: 588–592.Google Scholar
Dunn, J.P., Kimmerer, T.W., Nordin, G.L. 1986. The role of host tree condition in attack of white oaks by the twolined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus (Weber) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae. Oecologia, 70: 596–600.Google Scholar
Evans, H.F., Moraal, L.G., Pajares, J.A. 2004. Biology, ecology and economic importance of Buprestidae and Cerambycidae. In Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Edited by F. Lieutier, K.R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire, and H.F. Evans. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 447–474.Google Scholar
Fisher, W.S. 1928. A revision of the North American species of buprestid beetles belonging to the genus Agrilus . United States National Museum Bulletin, 145: 1–347.Google Scholar
Francese, J.A., Crook, D.J., Fraser, I., Lance, D.R., Sawyer, A.J., Mastro, V.C. 2010. Optimization of trap color for emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 103: 1235–1241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francese, J.A., Mastro, V.C., Oliver, J.B., Lance, D.R., Youssef, N., Lavallee, S.G. 2005. Evaluation of colors for trapping Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Entomological Science, 40: 93–95.Google Scholar
Haack, R.A. Benjamin, D.M. 1980. Influence of time of summer felling of infested oak trees on larval development and adult emergence or the twolined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus . University of Wisconsin Forestry Research Note, 236: 1–4.Google Scholar
Haack, R.A. Benjamin, D.M. 1982. The biology and ecology of the twolined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), on oaks, Quercus spp., in Wisconsin. The Canadian Entomologist, 114: 385–396.Google Scholar
Haack, R.A., Jendek, E., Liu, H., Marchant, K.R., Petrice, T.R., Poland, T.M. 2002. The emerald ash borer: a new exotic pest in North America. Newsletter of Michigan Entomological Society, 47: 1–5.Google Scholar
Haack, R.A., Petrice, T.R., Zablotny, J.E. 2009. The first report of the European oak borer, Agrilus sulcicollis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), in the United States. Great Lakes Entomologist, 42: 1–7.Google Scholar
Hansen, J.A., Petrice, T.R., Haack, R.A. 2011. New state distribution and host records of North American Buprestidae. Great Lakes Entomologist, 44: 74–77.Google Scholar
Hedin, J., Isacsson, G., Jonsell, M., Komonen, A. 2008. Forest fuel piles as ecological traps for saproxylic beetles in oak. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23: 348–357.Google Scholar
Hilszczanski, J. Sierpinski, A. 2008. Agrilus spp. the main factor of oak decline in Poland, In IUFRO Working Party 7.03.10, Proceedings of the 7th workshop on methodology of forest insect and disease survey in Central Europe, September 11 of Forest Gmunden, Austria. Edited by U. Hoyer-Tomiczek, M. Knížek, B. Forster, and W. Grodzki. Pp. 121–125. Available from http://bfw.ac.at/400/iufro_workshop/proceedings/121-125_B5_Jacek%20Hilszczanski_Andrzej%20Sierpinski_paper.pdf [accessed 22 August 2013].Google Scholar
Jendek, E. Grebennikov, V.V. 2009. Agrilus sulcicollis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), a new alien species in North America. The Canadian Entomologist, 141: 236–245.Google Scholar
Kovacs, K.F., Haight, R.G., McCullough, D.G., Mercader, R.J., Siegert, N.W., Liebhold, A.M. 2010. Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. communities, 2009-2019. Ecological Economics, 69: 569–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D. Jr., Smith, D.R., Burks, B.D. 1979. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico, Volume 1. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kula, R.R., Knight, K.S., Rebbeck, J., Bauer, L.S., Cappaert, D.L., Gandhi, K.J.K. 2010. Leluthia astigma (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Doryctinae) as a parasitoid of Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae), with an assessment of host associations for Nearctic species of Leluthia Cameron. Proceedings of Entomological Society of Washington, 112: 246–257.Google Scholar
Loerch, C.R. Cameron, E.A. 1983. Determination of larval instars of the bronze birch borer, Agrilus anxius (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 76: 948–952.Google Scholar
MacRae, T.C. 2003. Agrilus (s. str.) betulanigrae MacRae (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini), a new species from North America, with comments on subgeneric placement and a key to the otiosus species group in North America. Zootaxa, 380: 1–9.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., Cappaert, D. 2009. Attraction of the emerald ash borer to ash trees stressed by girdling, herbicide treatments, or wounding. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39: 1331–1345.Google Scholar
Michigan State University Enviro-Weather. 2011. Weather based pest, natural resources, and production management tools [online]. Available from http://enviroweather.msu.edu/homeMap.php [accessed December 2012].Google Scholar
Moraal, L.G. Hilszczanski, J. 2000. The oak buprestid beetle, Agrilus biguttatus (F.) (Col., Buprestidae), a recent factor in oak decline in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 73: 134–138.Google Scholar
National Agriculture Pest Information System. 2013. Survey status of jewel beetle- Agrilus sulcicollis [online]. Available from http://pest.ceris.purdue.edu/map.php?code=INAHBTA [accessed October 2013].Google Scholar
Nelson, G.H., Walters, G.C. Jr., Haines, R.D., Bellamy, C.L. 2008. A catalog and bibliography of the Buprestoidea of America north of Mexico. The Coleopterists Society, Special Publication, 4: 1–274.Google Scholar
Noel, A.R.A. 1970. The girdled tree. Botanical Review, 36: 162–195.Google Scholar
Oliver, J.B., Fare, D.C., Youssef, N., Klingeman, W. 2003. Collection of adult flatheaded borers using multicolored traps. Proceedings of the Southern Nursery Association Research Conference, 48: 193–199.Google Scholar
Oliver, J.B., Mastro, V.C., Lance, D.R., Francese, J.A., Youssef, N., Lavallee, S.G., et al. 2004. Development of traps to survey emerald ash borer. In Emerald ash borer research and technology development meeting, 30 September–1 October 2003, Port Huron, MI. Edited by V. Mastro and R. Reardon. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America. Pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
Palm, T. 1959. Die Holz- und Rinden-Käfer der Süd- und Mittelschwedischen Laubbäume [The wood- and bark-beetles of south and mid-Swedish broadleaves]. Opuscula Entomologica, Supplement, 16: 1–374.Google Scholar
Palm, T. 1962. Zur Kenntnis der früheren Entwicklungsstadien schwedischer Käfer. 2. Buprestiden larven, die in Bäumen leben. Opuscula Entomologica, 27: 65–78.Google Scholar
Petrice, T.R., Haack, R.A., Poland, T.M. 2013. Attraction of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and other buprestids to sticky traps of various colors and shapes. Great Lakes Entomologist, 46: 13–30.Google Scholar
Petrice, T.R., Haack, R.A., Strazanac, J.S., Lelito, J.P. 2009. Biology and larval morphology of Agrilus subcinctus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), with comparisons to the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis . Great Lakes Entomologist, 42: 173–184.Google Scholar
Poland, T.M. McCullough, D.G. 2006. Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America's ash resource. Journal of Forestry, 104: 118–124.Google Scholar
Sakalian, V.P., Dimova, V.I., Damianov, G.C. 1993. Utilization of colour traps for faunistic investigation on beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera). In Second national scientific conference of entomology, 22–27 October, Sofia. Edited by G. Tsankov, V. Beshovski, and A. Popov. Bulgarian Entomological Society, Sofia, Bulgaria. Pp. 47–52.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 2008. SAS/STAT 9.2 user's guide: introduction to analysis of variance procedures. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.B., Duan, J.J., Fuester, R., Hoodle, M.S., van Driesche, R. 2012. Parasitoid guilds of Agrilus woodborers (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): their diversity and potential for use in biological control. Psyche, 2012: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2012/813929..Google Scholar
Tluczek, A.R., McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M. 2011. Influence of host stress on emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) adult density, development, and distribution in Fraxinus pennsylvanica trees. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 40: 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellso, S.G., Manley, G.V., Jackman, J.A. 1976. Keys and notes on the Buprestidae (Coleoptera) of Michigan. Great Lakes Entomologist, 9: 1–22.Google Scholar