Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:51:08.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AN APPRAISAL OF TWO METHODS OF ANALYZING INSECT LIFE TABLES1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert F. Luck
Robert F. Luck
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two methods of analyses, Morris’ key-factor analysis and Varley and Gradwell’s method of analysis, purport to detect density-dependent and density-independent mortality. To test their claims, both methods were used to analyze a life table constructed from a model in which the mode of action of each mortality factor is known. The results show that Morris’ method can detect variation in mortality between generations but it cannot distinguish the density relationships of that mortality. On the other hand, Varley and Gradwell’s method of analysis was found to detect the density relationships of the mortality as it was modeled, when their modified method, the ’proof of density dependence test,’ is used in conjunction with the linear regression of k-value against the density on which it acts.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 103 , Issue 9 , September 1971 , pp. 1261 - 1271
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blank, H. T. et al. 1967. The ecology of the partridge. 1: Outline of population processes with particular reference to chick mortality and nest density. J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 549–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. P. and Huffaker, C. B.. 1969. The appraisal of delayed and direct density-dependences. Can. Ent. 101: 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, Y. 1967. Life tables in the population ecology with special reference to insects. Seibutsu-Kagaku (Biol. Sci., Tokyo), 18: 127–134, 167–175.Google Scholar
Klomp, H. 1966. Dynamics of field populations of pine looper, Bupalus piniarius L. (Lep., Geom.). In Cragg, J. B. (Ed.), Advances in ecological research, Vol. 3. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Li, J. C. R. 1964. Statistical inference, Vol. 1, 658 pp. Edward Bros., Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1959. Single-factor analysis in population dynamics. Ecology 40: 580–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1963. Predictive population equations based on key-factors. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 32, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. and Royama, T.. 1969. Logarithmic regression as an index of responses to population density. Comment on a paper by M. P. Hassell and C. B. Huffaker. Can. Ent. 101: 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, M. M. and Morris, R. F.. 1964. The regulation of European spruce sawfly numbers in the Maritime Provinces of Canada from 1937 to 1963. Can. Ent. 96: 773–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. and Bailey, V. A.. 1935. The balance of animal populations, I. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1935: 551–598.Google Scholar
Reddingius, J. 1968. Gambling for existence. D.Sc. Thesis, Groningen University, 172 pp.Google Scholar
Southern, H. N. 1970. The natural control of a population of Tawny owls (Strix aluco). J. Zool., Lond. 162: 197–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1967. The interpretation of population change. J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varley, G. C. 1947. The natural control of population balance in the knapweed gall-fly (Urophora jaceana). J. Anim. Ecol. 16: 139–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varley, G. C. and Gradwell, G. R.. 1960. Key factors in population studies. J. Anim. Ecol. 29: 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varley, G. C. and Gradwell, G. R.. 1965. Interpreting winter population changes. XII Int. Congr. Ent. (London), pp. 377–378.Google Scholar
Varley, G. C. and Gradwell, G. R.. 1968. Population models for winter moth. In Southwood, T. R. E. (Ed.), Insect abundance. Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond., Vol. 4, pp. 132–142.Google Scholar
Varley, G. C. and Gradwell, G. R.. 1970. Recent advances in insect population dynamics. A. Rev. Ent. 15: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar