No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
1 Mr. Charles Johnson has also stressed the importance of the publication of the Clerkenwell Cartulary in a review of J. G. Jenkins, edition of The Cartulary of Missenden Abbey, Eng. His. Rev., v. 154.
2 No. 288. This is noticed by Harben and is the only one of the early references to London parishes in the Cartulary noticed by scholars.
3 No. 336 (1236/7), as compared with 43 Hen. III in Harben. Nos. 226–7 are c. 1216/23.
4 No. 243.
5 No. 6.
6 No. 255.
7 No. 6.
8 Hassall, W. O., ‘ Two Papal Bulls, for St. Mary Clerkenwell ’, Eng. Hist. Rev., lvii. 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 No. 256 ; probably an alternative dedication of Allhallows Honey lane.
10 No. 277 ; perhaps a loose way of describing St. Leonard Foster Lane.
11 No. 310. This land was legally in the archbishop's soke ; see no. 6. cf. H. W. C. Davis, Essays in Medieval history, pp. 46,55–9 ; W. Page, London, map on p. 133 ; Stow, i. 41, ii. 7 and 358 ; Munimenta Gildhallae, i. 241; Eng. Hist. Rev., xiv. 428.
12 No. 297; perhaps the same area as the ‘ soke of Cripplegate’ which was ‘ granted to St. Martin's in 1067’ (W. Page, op. cit., p. 144; cf. 162).