Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:46:43.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ministry and the Corn Bill1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Appendix II
Information
Camden Third Series , Volume 59 , July 1937 , pp. 290 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 294 note 1 In a letter to the Duke dated 31 May, Lord Colchester, a former Speaker of the House of Commons, pointed out that as the Corn Bill was “A Bill to grant certain duties or customs on Corn,” the House of Lords had no power to amend it, the exclusive claim of the Commons to regulate all matters of supply having uniformly been asserted since their famous Resolution of 3 July 1678 (Colchester Diary, iii. 513).Google Scholar

page 295 note 1 Lord Seaford was a West Indian proprietor.

page 296 note 1 Binning had married Macclesfield's daughter.

page 298 note 1 Frances, daughter of the fourth Earl and first Marquess of Bute, married Lord Harrowby's eldest son. Viscount Sandon.