Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:11:54.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix 3: The Cartulary and the Early Topography and History of London

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Appendices
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mr. Charles Johnson has also stressed the importance of the publication of the Clerkenwell Cartulary in a review of J. G. Jenkins, edition of The Cartulary of Missenden Abbey, Eng. His. Rev., v. 154.

2 No. 288. This is noticed by Harben and is the only one of the early references to London parishes in the Cartulary noticed by scholars.

3 No. 336 (1236/7), as compared with 43 Hen. III in Harben. Nos. 226–7 are c. 1216/23.

4 No. 243.

5 No. 6.

6 No. 255.

7 No. 6.

8 Hassall, W. O., ‘ Two Papal Bulls, for St. Mary Clerkenwell ’, Eng. Hist. Rev., lvii. 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 No. 256 ; probably an alternative dedication of Allhallows Honey lane.

10 No. 277 ; perhaps a loose way of describing St. Leonard Foster Lane.

11 No. 310. This land was legally in the archbishop's soke ; see no. 6. cf. H. W. C. Davis, Essays in Medieval history, pp. 46,55–9 ; W. Page, London, map on p. 133 ; Stow, i. 41, ii. 7 and 358 ; Munimenta Gildhallae, i. 241; Eng. Hist. Rev., xiv. 428.

12 No. 297; perhaps the same area as the ‘ soke of Cripplegate’ which was ‘ granted to St. Martin's in 1067’ (W. Page, op. cit., p. 144; cf. 162).