Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:15:04.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the Sources: Lords

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
I. General Introduction
Information
Camden Fourth Series , Volume 19: Proceedings of the Short Parliament of 1640 , July 1977 , pp. 16 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 16 note 1 B.L., E.157(11).

page 16 note 2 Hurley Letters, p. 94.Google Scholar

page 18 note 1 B.L., Add. MS. 11045, fo 116r.

page 18 note 2 B.L., Harl. MS. 165, fo 4r.

page 18 note 3 Concerning the Harley Papers, see below, pp. 24–25; Oxinden Letters; The Memoirs of Sir Hugh Cholmley, Knt. and Bart. Addressed to his Two Sons (printed for private use, 1787); The Diary of Sir Henry Slingsby of Scriven, Bart., ed. Rev. Daniel Parsons (London, 1836); The Diary of John Rous, ed. Green, Mary Anne Everett (Camden Society, lxvi, London, 1856).Google Scholar

page 19 note 1 The Braye MSS, now at the House of Lords Record Office and in the Osborn Collection, Yale University Library, are described in Bond, Records, pp. 269–72Google Scholar; also Hist. MSS Comm., xv, Tenth Report, App. vi: Braye MSS (London, 1887).Google Scholar

page 19 note 2 For example, Braye 16, fos 3–6V, pp. 53–57.

page 19 note 3 L.J., iv, pp. 67, 73.Google Scholar

page 19 note 1 The Braye MSS, now at the House of Lords Record Office and in the Osborn Collection, Yale University Library, are described in Bond, Records, pp. 269–72Google Scholar; also Hist. MSS Comm., xv, Tenth Report, App. vi: Braye MSS (London, 1887).Google Scholar

page 19 note 2 For example, Braye 16, fos 3–6V, pp. 53–57.

page 19 note 3 L.J., iv, pp. 67, 73.Google Scholar

page 20 note 1 For example, Braye 16, fo 9, n. 1, fos 10v, 8r below, pp. 57, 59, 60. For a general assessment of Browne's work as clerk, see Bond, M. F., The Formation of the Archives of Parliament, 1497–1691,’ Journal of the Society of Archivists, i (1957). PP. 156–57.Google Scholar

page 20 note 2 Although Robert Bowyer, clerk in the early part of the century, put the votes in groups of five, Browne's method was used as late as 1713 (Bond, Records, plate 2).

page 20 note 3 For example, below, pp. 66, 92, Braye 16, fos 17, 44v.

page 20 note 4 The Draft Journal is preserved at the House of Lords Record Office.

page 20 note 5 The lords signed the Journal on 18 April and 2 May. Their names are in Browne's hand 25 April.

page 20 note 6 Cf. D.J., pp. 4, 13–15Google Scholar and Braye 16, fos 3–4, 9v–10 below, pp. 53–54, 59.

page 20 note 7 For example that of the Lord Keeper, 13 April (D.J., p. 4); report of conference, 29 April (D.J., p. 44).

page 20 note 8 Bond, , Records, p. 272.Google Scholar

page 21 note 1 See Braye 16 (24 April); Speeches, D.J. Charles I (24 April), below, pp. 69–70, 264–65.

page 21 note 2 E.g., fos 87r, 89r.

page 21 note 3 E.g., fos 119r, 122v, 124r.

page 21 note 4 E.g., fos 90r, 151r.

page 21 note 5 E.g., fos 87r, 90r; also Braye 2, fos 64v, 68v.

page 21 note 6 See App., L.K. (25 April, 1 May), Pym (28 April), below, pp. 310, 312, 314.

page 21 note 7 The Manuscript Journal is preserved at the House of Lords Record Office.

page 21 note 8 When writing about the selection of receavours and triers of petitions, Browne began in English, but he wrote above the line ‘in French’ and crossed out his English (D.J., p. 5). In the printed Journal (iv, p. 48), the phrase is interpreted as part of the text rather than as an editorial note. See also Braye 16 (24 April); Speeches, D.J., Charles I (24 April) below, pp. 70, 264.

page 21 note 9 E.g., App., Speeches, Charles I (13 April), below, p. 293.

page 22 note 1 See Cope, Esther S., ‘Lord Montagu and his Journal of the Short Parliament’, B.I.H.R., xlvi (1973)Google Scholar. The journal is not mentioned in Hist. MSS Comm., xlv, Report on the MSS of the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry, Montagu Papers, i (London, 1899)Google Scholar, iii (1926), which describes Lord Montagu's collections and prints his journals for some earlier Parliaments.

page 22 note 2 We owe many thanks to Professor Mary Frear Keeler, through whom this diary came to our attention. See D.N.B., ‘Warner’Google Scholar; Lee-Warner, Edward, The Life of John Warner, Bishop of Rochester, 1637–1666 (London, 1901).Google Scholar

page 23 note 1 The hand is similar to but not clearly identical with that in Warner's diary of the Long Parliament (B.L., Harl. MS. 6424); see Russell, Conrad, ‘The Authorship of the Bishop's Diary of the House of Lords in 1641’, B.I.H.R., xli (1968), pp. 229–36Google Scholar. See also B.L., Add. MS. 32096, fos 182r–83v; Bodl. MS. Tanner 49, fo 23.

page 23 note 2 See below, Braye 16 (24 April), p. 72, n. 3, Lee Warner, pp. 2, 3, 4 (18, 24, 27 April), pp. 108, 109, 110.

page 23 note 3 Glanville (below, Lee Warner, p. 1; Dr Steiron Cheston (below, p. 106).

page 23 note 4 E.g. Lee Warner, p. 4 (27 April) Comm. of Privileges; p. 5 (28 April), Comm. of Grievances, below, pp. 111, 113.

page 23 note 5 Warner, Lee, p. 3, p. 110.Google Scholar

page 23 note 6 E.g. below, Lee Warner, p. 2 (16 April) Orders, p. 4 (25 April) Convocation, pp. 107, 111.