Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:07:29.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ii. The Trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Camden Fourth Series , Volume 20: Heresy Trials in the Diocese of Norwich, 1428–31 , July 1977 , pp. 7 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

38 McFarlane, , Wycliffe, p. 120.Google Scholar

39 Thomson, , Later Lollards, pp. 28–30, 57–61, 120–31, 144–8, 174–7 and 223–4Google Scholar; see below, pp. 29–30.

40 Reg. Chichele, ed. Jacob, i, p. cxxxvii.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., iii, p. 185.

42 Hefele, C. J. and Leclerq, H., Histoire des Conciles (Paris, 1907–1916), vii, pp. 638–9.Google Scholar

43 Fasciculi Zizaniorum, ed. Shirley, W. W. (Rolls Series, London, 1858), pp. 417–32.Google Scholar

44 See p. 45, n. 45.

45 Annales Monasterii Sancii Albani a Johanne Amundesham conscripti, ed. Riley, H. T. (Rolls Series, London, 1870–1871), i, p. 29Google Scholar; The Records of the City of Norwich, ed. Hudson, W. and Tingey, J. (Norwich, 1906–1910), ii, p. 66.Google Scholar

46 REG/5, Book 9, fos. 108r–103v. And see: Gage, J., ‘Letters …. for the Suppression of the Lollards’, Archaeologia, xxiii (1831), 339–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thomson, J. A. F., ‘A Lollard Rising in Kent: 1431 or 1438?’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, xxxvii (1964), 100–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 See Foxe, , ActsGoogle Scholar, Book 6 (ed. Pratt, iii, pp. 584–600). The principal record used by Foxe in his account of the persecution in the diocese is the manuscript here edited. The manuscript shows that there are many errors in his account. So it is difficult to know how reliable is his handling of this additional material. Some of the inaccuracies are discussed in Thomson, , ‘John Foxe’, 251–7.Google Scholar

48 Foxe, , ActsGoogle Scholar, Book 6 (ed. Pratt, iii, p. 587).

49 See pp. 210–16.

50 Earsham, south-east Norfolk.

51 See p. 75.

52 See pp. 75 and 89.

53 Emden, , BRUO, ii, pp. 1343–4.Google Scholar

54 See Thomson, , Later Lollards, pp. 28–30, 57–61, 120–31, 144–8, 174–7 and 223–4.Google Scholar

55 See pp. 51–2.

56 The Statutes of the Realm (London, 1810–1828), ii, pp. 181–4.Google Scholar