No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2009
page 233 note 1 See below, App. (13 April), p. 293.
page 233 note 2 MS.: 15; the Speaker was presented 15 April.
page 233 note 3 See below, App., Grimston, p. 296.
page 233 note 4 See below, App., Seymour, p. 297.
page 234 note 1 See below, App., Rudyerd, p. 296.
page 234 note 2 M.P. for Colchester.
page 234 note 3 Harley.
page 234 note 4 Probably his speech of 15 April (below, App. (15 April), p. 294).
page 234 note 5 Laud.
page 234 note 6 See below, App., Pym, p. 299.
page 234 note 7 The speech noted above.
page 235 note 1 M.P. for Winchelsea.
page 235 note 2 Debate of 21 April.
page 236 note 1 Debate of 22 April.
page 236 note 2 See below. Petition, Smart, p. 280.
page 236 note 3 C.J., ii, p. 9.Google Scholar
page 236 note 4 Canterbury.
page 236 note 5 The Lord Keeper spoke to both Lords and Commons at the Banqueting House, 21 April (see below, App. (21 April), p. 303).
page 237 note 1 No formal answer was given to the king (C.J., ii, p. 9).Google Scholar
page 237 note 2 Stephen Marshall, leading preacher for the Long Parliament; Ralph Brownrig, bishop of Exeter, 1641; Sir Thomas Barrington (Essex).
page 237 note 3 We have been unable to identify Shepeheard.
page 237 note 4 Perhaps a reference to his speech at the conference 28 April (below, Harl. MS. 4931, fos 48–48v, p. 239).
page 237 note 5 No conference was held.
page 237 note 6 C.J. gives no evidence of this. For the figures to be accurate virtually all M.P.s would have to have been present.
page 238 note 1 MS.: priviledge.
page 238 note 2 Debate of 20 April.
page 238 note 3 The Lord Keeper spoke for the House of Lords, not for the king (see below, App., L.K. (25 April), p. 310).
page 238 note 4 There is no record of a Mr. Estwicke in the Parliament. The business may be that in orders for committees, 29 April (C.J., ii, p. 15).Google Scholar
page 239 note 1 Perhaps the debate of Jones and Pym, 23 April.
page 239 note 2 28 April.
page 239 note 3 See debates of 24 and 29 April.
page 239 note 4 C.J., ii, p. 15Google Scholar, and below, App., Pym (28 April), p. 312. Rossingham says the motion of thanks came from ‘both the Secretaries’ (B.L., Add. MS. 11045, fo 114r).
page 240 note 1 See below, App., Pym (28 April), p. 312.
page 240 note 2 Jas. Hay, 2nd earl of Carlisle. The bishop of Carlisle was not present.
page 240 note 3 Perhaps on 23 April.
page 241 note 1 Perhaps on 27 April.
page 241 note 2 See below, App., L.K. (1 May), p. 314.
page 242 note 1 See below, B.L. Harl. MS., 4931, fo 49 (Commons), p. 242.
page 242 note 2 Perhaps the debate of 30 April.
page 243 note 1 The message went to the House of Commons.
page 243 note 2 Lords' House. Rossingham and Montereul mention a protestation against shipmoney which was to have been presented to the Commons (CSP 1640, P, 153Google Scholar; P.R.O. 31/3/72, fo 140r); see also Clarendon, , History, II. 76.Google Scholar
page 243 note 3 See below, App. (5 May), p. 316.
page 244 note 1 There is no record of debate 5 May (C.J., ii, p. 19).Google Scholar
page 244 note 2 See below, App. (13 April), p. 293.
page 244 note 3 See below, App. (15 April), p. 299.
page 245 note 1 See below, App., Grimston, p. 296.
page 245 note 2 See below, App., Rudyerd, p. 296.
page 245 note 3 See below, App., Seymour, p. 297.
page 245 note 4 See below, App., Pym, p. 299.
page 246 note 1 See below, App., L.K., p. 303.
page 246 note 2 See below, Petition, Smart, p. 280.
page 246 note 3 The Privy Council (below, S.P. 16/450/113, p. 290).
page 247 note 1 Cf. S.P. 16/451/10, and below.
page 247 note 2 Wrongly dated 27 April in S.P. 16/450/94 and S.P. 16/451/10; CSP 1640, pp. 39–40Google Scholar, is correct.
page 247 note 3 See below, App., L.K. (25 April), p. 310.
page 247 note 4 See below, App., Grievances, , p. 308.Google Scholar
page 247 note 5 See above, 25 April, p. 247, n. 2.