No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Wanglie Case from an Uruguayan Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
Extract
My experience concerning cases similar to the Wanglie case indicates that there was virtually no possibility of a solution for the conflict between the different expectations of the Wanglie family and those of the physicians caring for Helga Wanglie. A persistent vegetative state precludes a return to consciousness unless an extraordinary phenomenon takes place. Therefore, the physicians expected to be relieved of the duty of continuing to give Mrs. Wanglie respiratory care. However, her family thought it their duty to provide their loved one with the best possible treatment. The family based their position on the claim that life is God's gift and that only He has the right to terminate it. Such spiritual convictions are perceived as reflective of a higher “truth” and are not predisposed to negotiation or change according to the situation.
- Type
- Special Section: Medical Futility: Demands, Duties, and Dilemmas
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993