Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:51:37.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sexual Reproduction Is a Survival Lottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2004

JOHN HARRIS
Affiliation:
John Harris, D.Phil., is Sir David Alliance Professor of Bioethics, Institute of Medicine, Law, and Bioethics, School of Law, University of Manchester, United Kingdom

Extract

I have argued that because human sexual reproduction inevitably involves the creation and destruction of embryos, it is a problematic activity for those who believe that the embryo is “one of us.” Or, if it is not a problematic activity, then neither is the creation and destruction of embryos for a purpose of comparable moral seriousness—the development of lifesaving therapy, for example. I assume that, whereas it is possible for the very first act of unprotected intercourse to result in a live human baby, and hence not in a given case cause any embryo loss, this is a rare event and that, statistically, for every live birth from three to five embryos must be created only to die. For dramatic effect, I assume that five is a reasonable figure, giving each embryo a 20% chance of survival; however, nothing in the argument depends on any specific figures being correct.Søren Holm has been an important source of ideas for this paper. Julian Savulescu has also been very generous in commenting in detail on this paper, and I have taken account of the critique that I have received.

Type
THE GREAT DEBATES
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)