Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:20:13.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Professional Ethics and Labor Disputes: Medicine and Nursing in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2000

RUTH CHADWICK  and
ALISON THOMPSON
RUTH CHADWICK
Affiliation:
Centre for Professional Ethics at the University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
ALISON THOMPSON
Affiliation:
University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The term “industrial action” includes any noncooperation with management, such as strict “working to rule,” refusal of certain duties, going slow, and ultimately withdrawal of labor. The latter form of action, striking, has posed particular problems for professional ethics, especially in those professions that provide healthcare, because of the potential impact on patients' well-being. Examination of the issues, however, displays a difference in response between the healthcare professions, in particular between doctors and nurses. In considering the ethics of industrial (especially strike) action there are various aspects of professional ethics to consider: (1) whether there is a tension between industrial action and the very notion of professional ethics; (2) what specific issues arise in the case of healthcare professions; (3) what, if anything, can explain and/or justify different responses from the medical and nursing professions?

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 2000 , pp. 483 - 497
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)