Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:19:21.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Martha as a Mother

Parents, Parental Choices, and Preimplantation Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2013

HEATHER DRAPER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section: Rationality, Morality, and Disability
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 8 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Styron, W. Sophie’s Choice. New York: Random House; 1976.Google Scholar

2. Rothman, BK. The Tentative Pregnancy. London: W. W. Norton; 1993, at 179.Google ScholarPubMed

3. 1 Kings 3: 16–27.

4. Harris, J. Clones, Genes and Immortality. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.Google Scholar

5. See note 4, Harris 1998, at 109–10.

6. See note 4, Harris 1998, at 90.

7. See note 4, Harris 1998, at 91.

8. For instance, see note 4, Harris 1998, at 88.

9. See note 4, Harris 1998, at 111.

10. See note 4, Harris 1998, e.g., at 111, 116.

11. For instance, Harris, J. Rights and reproductive choice. In: Harris, J, Holm, S, eds. The Future of Human Reproduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. See, for instance, note 4, Harris 1998, at 92–7; Erin CA, Harris J. Surrogacy. In: Walters WAW, ed. Human Reproduction: Current and Future Ethical Issues. Bailliere’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. London: Bailliere Tindall; 1991.

13. Harris, J. The Value of Life. London: Routledge Kegan Paul; 1985, at 152.Google Scholar

14. See note 13, Harris 1985, at 71–2.

15. See note 13, Harris 1985, at 72.

16. See note 13, Harris 1985, at 140.

17. See note 4, Harris 1998, at 89.

18. See note 4, Harris 1998, at 90.

19. See note 4, Harris 1998, at 91.

20. See, for instance, Draper, H. Why there is no right to know one’s genetic origins. In: Athanssoulis, N, ed. Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics. Hamphsire and New York: Palgrave Macmilian; 2005, at 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. See note 4, Harris 1998, at 79–86.

22. See note 4, Harris 1998, at 22, 51–2; see note 13, Harris 1985, at 126. Note that I assume here that artificial parthenogenesis would be successful in the sense that the failure to implant could be overcome.

23. See note 4, Harris 1998, at 75–6.