Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:11:28.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Sense of Consensus: Responses to Engelhardt, Hester, Kuczewski, Trotter, and Zoloth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2002

JONATHAN D. MORENO
JONATHAN D. MORENO
Affiliation:
Center for Biomedical Ethics at the University of Virginia and the National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has been a pleasure to read these papers and to contemplate their importance for what I believe to be a useful and provocative prism though which to view the field of bioethics: the nature of moral consensus. In my own most extended contribution to this literature, Deciding Together, I did not attempt to prescribe so much as to understand the role of moral consensus in the practice of bioethics. At the end of the book, I expressed the hope that it might help trigger an examination of bioethics and moral consensus. Though a few others shared my interest at that time (in particular Tris Engelhardt, for whose early encouragement I remain deeply grateful), with this set of stimulating papers the conversation has finally begun in earnest.

Type
SPECIAL SECTION: CONSENSUS IN BIOETHICS: NEGOTIATING THE CHALLENGE OF MORAL PLURALISM
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2002 , pp. 61 - 64
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)