Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T09:20:04.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Defense of Uncommon Morality

A Response to: Leonard Fleck, “Medical Ethics: A Distinctive Species of Ethics,” Leslie Francis, “Beyond Common or Uncommon Morality” and Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry, “In Search of Medical Ethics and Its Foundation with Rosamond Rhodes” (CQ 29 (3))

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2022

Rosamond Rhodes
Rosamond Rhodes*
Affiliation:
Rosamond Rhodes Bioethics Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Responses and Dialogue
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 144 - 149
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Rhodes, R. Medical ethics: Common or uncommon morality. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2020;29(3):404–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

2. Fleck, LM. Medical ethics: A distinctive species of ethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2020; 29(3):421–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Francis, L. Beyond common or uncommon morality. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2020;29(3):426–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

4. Takala, T, Hӓyry, M. In search of medical ethics and its foundation with Rosamond Rhodes. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2020;29(3):429–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

5. See note 2, Fleck 2020, at 421–5.

6. See note 2, Fleck 2020, at 422.

7. See note 2, Fleck 2020, at 423.

8. See note 2, Fleck 2020, at 423.

9. Baier, A. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 1986;96(2):231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. O’Neill O. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics: The 2001 Gifford Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.

11. O’Neill, O. Linking trust to trustworthiness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2018;26(2):293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. O’Neill O. Justice, Trust and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

13. See note 3, Francis 2020, at 426.

14. See note 3, Francis 2020, at 427.

15. See note 3, Francis 2020, at 427.

16. Rhodes R. The Trusted Doctor: Medical Ethics and Professionalism. New York: Oxford University Press; 2020, at 28–137.

17. See note 16, Rhodes 2020, at 296–9.

18. See note 1, Rhodes 2020, at 413.

19. See note 3, Francis 2020, at 427.

20. See note 4, Takala, Hӓyry 2020, at 432.

21. See note 4, Takala, Hӓyry 2020, at 434.

22. Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. A548/B576.

23. See note 1, Rhodes 2020, at 414.

24. See note 4, Takala, Hӓyry 2020, at 434.