Article contents
Ethics in the Outpatient Setting: New Challenges and Opportunities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
Extract
It is not the outpatient setting, per se, that is presenting new challenges and opportunities to ethics consultants and ethics committees. Rather, it is the underlying reason for shifting more and more patient care from the inpatient to the outpatient setting-namely, calculations of cost-effectiveness.
- Type
- Special Section: Healthcare Ethics Committees and Consultants: The State of the Art
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997
References
Notes
1. Young, EWD. The power of the nonrational in demands for marginally beneficial or useless treatments. Second Opinion 1994;20(2):95–8.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Young, EWD. Conceptual ethical issues in the shift in emphasis from inpatient to outpatient services. NCCE News 1995;9:1–2.Google Scholar
3. From Bedlam to bedsit: Care in the community is not working, and recent changes are doing nothing to improve it. Things are likely to get worse. The Economist. 2 September 1995:51–2.Google Scholar
4. Morrison, RS, et al. The inaccessibility of advance directives on transfer from ambulatory to acute care settings. JAMA 1995;274(6):478–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs. Good care of the dying patient. JAMA 1996;275(6):474–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 1995;274(20):1591–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Collins, FS. BRCA1—lots of mutations, lots of dilemmas. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;334(3):186–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. See Annas, GJ. The promised end—constitutional aspects of physician-assisted suicide. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;335(9):683–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Callahan, D, White, M. The legalization of physician-assisted suicide: creating a regulatory Potemkin Village. University of Richmond Law Review 1996;30(1):1–83.Google ScholarPubMed
- 4
- Cited by