Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T01:54:31.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commentary: On The Moral Bindingness of Advance Directives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2019

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section: Open Forum
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Vergallo, G. Advance health care directives: Binding or informational value? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2020;29(1).Google Scholar

2. I use hedging language about what “appears” or “seems” to be true of the December, 2017 Italian law because I am wholly reliant on English-language summaries of it, e.g., Ciliberti, R, Gorini, I, Gazzaniga, F, De Stefano, F, Gulino, M. The Italian law on informed consent and advance directives: New rules of conduct for the autonomy of doctors and patients in end-of-life care. Journal of Critical Care 2018;48:178–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Gunter-Hunt, G, Mahoney, JE, Sieger, CE. A comparison of state advance directive documents. The Gerontologist 2002;42(1):5160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

4. Dworkin, R. Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia and Individual Freedom. New York: Vintage Books; 1994.Google Scholar

5. Dresser, R. Dworkin on dementia: Elegant theory, questionable policy. The Hastings Center Report 1995;25(6):32–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

6. Hawkins, J. Well-being, time, and dementia. Ethics 2014;124(3):507–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar