Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T09:59:55.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commentary: Cultural Issues in Decisionmaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Extract

This case presents several fundamental ethical issues. The first issue is the patient’s refusal of treatment (a nasogastric tube [NGT] insertion). Second, the patient’s refusal of a seemingly beneficial treatment, combined with her medical history, ultimately necessitates an assessment of her decisionmaking capacity. Third, the sister’s reluctance to participate in decisionmaking requires a discussion of appropriate surrogate decisionmakers. Finally, the main ethical component to this case is a cultural one, which should be addressed appropriately.

Type
Departments and Columns
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Appelbaum, P. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;357(18):1834–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Murphy, L, Lipman, T. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy does not prolong survival in patients with dementia. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003;163:1351–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar