Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:18:18.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Access to Healthcare: A Central Question within Brazilian Bioethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2018

VOLNEI GARRAFA ,
THIAGO ROCHA DA CUNHA  and
CAMILO MANCHOLA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article explores the current situation regarding the importance of access to healthcare in relation to the genesis and context of bioethics developed in Brazil, a country in which healthcare is understood through the national constitution to be a universal right of its population. Since the onset of the development of Brazilian bioethics at the beginning of the 1990s, topics relating directly and indirectly to the field of public health have been a priority in the bioethics agenda. The article considers the socioeconomic context within which conflicts occur, an issue that has been addressed in other scientific articles on bioethics in Latin America. It presents the main conceptual bases of intervention bioethics, a critical approach that has been developed as a reference point in this region, with the aim of analyzing (bio)ethical issues and indicating solutions that relate specifically to the different forms of social exclusion that influence the health conditions and lives of people in Brazil, as well as in other peripheral countries in the Southern Hemisphere and of the world in general. The article calls attention to some of the problems and challenges that the Brazilian public health system has been facing. An international agenda of “universal health coverage” is one of the main global threats to implementing the universal right to healthcare as it has been understood in Brazil.

Keywords

Brazilpublic healthright to healthcarebioethicsintervention bioethics
Type
Special Section: Bioethics Beyond Borders
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 431 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Bioética, Garrafa V., saúde e cidadania. Humanidades 1994;9(4):342–51.Google Scholar

2. Garrafa V. Dimensão da ética em saúde pública. São Paulo: Faculdade de Saúde Pública USP/Kellogg Foundation; 1995.

3. Schramm, FR. Bioética – a terceira margem da Saúde. Brasília: Editora UnB; 1996.Google Scholar

4. Fortes PAC. Ética e saúde. São Paulo: EPU; 1998.

5. Kleinert, S, Horton, R. Brazil: towards sustainability and equity in health. Lancet 377(9779):1721–2.Google Scholar

6. Noronha JC, Lima LD, Machado CV. O Sistema Único de Saúde – SUS. In: Giovanella L, Escorel S, Lobato LVC, Noronha JC, Carvalho AI, eds. Políticas e Sistema de Saúde no Brasil, 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz/Cebes; 2014:365–93.

7. Rodríguez Del Pozo, P, Mainetti, JA. Bioética sin Más: the past, present, and future of a Latin American bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthc Ethics 2009;18(3):270–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

8. Breneman T. Brazil’s authoritarian experience: 1964–1985; a study of a conflict [Working Paper #95-1]. Conflict Research Consortium; 1995. https://www.colorado.edu/conflict/full_text_search/AllCRCDocs/95-1.htm (last accessed 6 Apr 2017).

9. Mainetti JA. The discourses of bioethics in Latin America. In: Pessini L, Barchifontaine CP, Stepke FL, eds. Ibero-American Bioethics—History and Perspectives. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer; 2010:21–8, at 25.

10. See note 9, Mainetti 2010, at 26.

11. Berlinguer G. Apresentação. In: Garrafa V, ed. Dimensão da ética em saúde pública. São Paulo: Faculdade de Saúde Pública USP/Kellogg Foundation; 1995:i–iii.

12. Campbell A. The president’s column. IAB News, the Newsletter of the International Association of Bioethics. 1998; Spring:7–12, at 7.

13. Garrafa V, Pessini L. Apresentação. In: Bioética: poder e injustiça. São Paulo: Loyola/Sociedade Brasileira de Bioética; 2003:11–6.

14. UNESCO. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, October 19, 2005; available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/bioethics-and-humanrights/ (last accessed 11 Aug 2017).

15. Barbosa SN. Bioética no Estado Brasileiro. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília; 2010.

16. See note 9, Mainetti 2010.

17. Garrafa, V, Porto, D. Bioética, poder e injustiça: por uma ética de intervenção. O Mundo da Saúde, São Paulo. 2002;26(1):6–15.Google Scholar

18. Garrafa, V, Prado, MM. Intervention bioethics: the best to the majority. News of the Panamerican Health Organization 2002;7(1):100.Google Scholar

19. Garrafa V. Bioética de Intervención [conference]. Presented at the 1er Congreso Boliviano de Bioética, La Paz, Bolívia, June 2001.

20. Garrafa V. Bioética fuerte: una perspectiva periférica a las teorías bioéticas tradicionales [conference]. Presented at the 3er Congreso de la Federación Latino-Americana y del Caribe de Instituciones de Bioética— FELAIBE, Panamá, May 2000.

21. Garrafa V. Ética y salud pública: el tema de la equidad y una propuesta bioética dura para los países periféricos. Presented at Actas de las 5a Jornadas Argentinas y Latinoamericanas de Bioética, Asociación Argentina de Bioética; Mar del Plata, Argentina, November 4–6, 1999.

22. Porto D, Garrafa V. The Brazilian Sanitary Reform’s influence in the construction of a national bioethics. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 2011;16:(Suppl.1):719–29.

23. Feitosa, S, Nascimento, S. The bioethics of intervention in the context of contemporary Latin American thinking. Revista Bioética 2015;23(2):276–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. Garrafa V, Porto D. Intervention bioethics: a proposal for peripheral countries in a context of power and injustice. Bioethics 2003;17(5–6):399–416.

25. Sánchez, TMS. Proposal for dialogue between bioethics and revolutionary thought in Latin America. Revista Brasileira de Bioética 2010;6(1–4):9–28.Google Scholar

26. Cunha T, Garrafa V. Vulnerability: a key principle for global bioethics? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2016;25(2):197–208.

27. van Olmen, J, Marchal, B, Van Damme, W, Kegels, G, Hill, PS. Health systems frameworks in their political context: framing divergent agendas. BMC Public Health 2012;12:774CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

28. World Health Organization, Word Bank. Tracking Universal Health Coverage: First Global Monitoring Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015, at iv.

29. Stuckler D, Basu S, McKee M. Global health philanthropy and institutional relationships: how should conflicts of interest be addressed? PLoS Medicine 2011:8(4):e1001020.

30. Nuruzzaman M. Health policy reforms and the poor in the global South. Canadian Presented at the Political Science Association Annual Conference, London, Ontario, Canada; 2005.

31. Rockefeller Foundation, Word Bank, World Health Organization. 500+ Organizations Launch Global Coalition to Accelerate Access to Universal Health Coverage, December 12, 2014; available at http://www.who.int/universal_health_coverage/universal-health-coverage-access-pr-20141212.pdf?ua=1 (last accessed 4 Apr 2017).

32. Scheffer, M. Foreign capital and the privatization of the Brazilian health system. Cad. Saúde Pública 2015;31(4):1–4.Google ScholarPubMed

33. See note 32, Scheffer 2015.

34. Noronha JC. Universal health coverage: how to mix concepts, confuse objectives, and abandon principles. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2013;29(5):847–9.

35. Yudhoyono SB, Sirleaf EJ, Cameron D, coordinators. High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. A New Global Partnership: Eradicate Poverty and Transform Economies Through Sustainable Development. The Report of the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. New York: United Nations; 2013.

36. See note 29, Stuckler et al. 2011.

37. See note 14, UNESCO 2005.