Common Morality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2013
This CQ department is dedicated to bringing noted bioethicists together in order to debate some of the most perplexing contemporary bioethics issues. Readers are invited to contact editors D. Micah Hester at [email protected] or Alissa H. Swota at [email protected] with their thoughts on this debate or with suggestions for debate topics and interlocutors.
1. Gert, B. Morality: A New Justification of the Moral Rules. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988, p. 5.Google Scholar
2. Gert, B. Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004, at v; see also p. 6.Google Scholar
3. Gert’s own account is that his early works, The Moral Rules (1970) and Morality (1988 and 1998) all contain the philosophical justification for his “common morality” theory that he expresses most explicitly in Common Morality (2004).Google Scholar
4. Donagan, A. The Theory of Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
5. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. The Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994, at 6.Google Scholar
6. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. The Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
7. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. The Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009, at 3, emphasis added.Google Scholar