Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:17:21.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Common Morality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2013

Extract

This CQ department is dedicated to bringing noted bioethicists together in order to debate some of the most perplexing contemporary bioethics issues. Readers are invited to contact editors D. Micah Hester at [email protected] or Alissa H. Swota at [email protected] with their thoughts on this debate or with suggestions for debate topics and interlocutors.

Type
The Great Debates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Gert, B. Morality: A New Justification of the Moral Rules. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988, p. 5.Google Scholar

2. Gert, B. Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004, at v; see also p. 6.Google Scholar

3. Gert’s own account is that his early works, The Moral Rules (1970) and Morality (1988 and 1998) all contain the philosophical justification for his “common morality” theory that he expresses most explicitly in Common Morality (2004).Google Scholar

4. Donagan, A. The Theory of Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar

5. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. The Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994, at 6.Google Scholar

6. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. The Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar

7. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. The Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009, at 3, emphasis added.Google Scholar