Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T00:06:44.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethical Issues Concerning Organ Donation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

John J. Paris
John J. Paris*
Affiliation:
SJ is the Michael P. Walsh Professor of Bioethics Emeritus, Theology Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 344 - 347
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Carroll E, Crutchfield P. The duty to protect, abortion, and organ donation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics; forthcoming.

2. Spadoro A. A big heart open to God: An interview with Pope Francis. America Magazine 2013 Sept 30:30–6; available at https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2013/09/30/big-heart-open-to-god (last accessed 15 September 2020).

3. Moreland MP. Amy Coney Barrett and the “dual loyalty” canard. National Review 2020 Sept 25; available at https//www.nationalreview.com/2020/09/amy-corey-barret-supremecourt-dual-loyalty-canard (last accessed 27 September 2020).

4. Bruening E. If Biden wins, will Catholicism win, too? The New York Times 2020 Sept 17:2SR.

5. Winters MS. Hoy Joe: How Catholic is Biden? The Tablet 2020 Sept 12:4–6.

6. Paris, JJ, Moreland, MP, Cummings, BM. The Catholic tradition on the due use of medical remedies: The Charlie Gard case. Theological Studies 2028;79(1):165–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Holmes Jr OW. The Common Law. Boston: Little Brown and Company; 1881.

8. Pierce CP. To be frank. The Boston Globe Magazine 2005 Oct 2:6–9.

9. Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 133 (1973).

10. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey 505 U.S. 833 (1992).

11. MilI JS. On Liberty. London: John W. Parker and Son; 1859:13.

12. Pellegrino, E. The metamorphosis of medical ethics. JAMA 1993;269(9):1158–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

13. Singer, PA, Siegler, M, Whitington, PF, Lantos, JD, Emond, JC, Thistlethwaite, JR, et al. Ethics of liver transplantation with living donors. New England Journal of Medicine 1989;321(9):620–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

14. Moore, F. The desperate case: CARE (costs, applicability, research, ethics). JAMA 1989;261(10):1483–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

15. Annas, GJ, Grodin, M. Historical origins of the Nuremberg code. In: Annas, GJ, Grodin, M, eds. The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992 Google Scholar.

16. Marchac, A, Kuschner, T, Paris, JJ, Picard, A, Vazquez, MP, Lantieri, L. Ethical issues in pediatric face transplantation: Should we perform face transplantation in children? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2016;138(2):449–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.